Modern Family Mafia - Game Over, Man.

Katsuki · Post Post #775 (ISO) » Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:42 am

unvote

Spyspy and LLD are scum.

Katsuki · Post Post #776 (ISO) » Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:42 am

VOTE: LLD

xRECKONERx · Post Post #777 (ISO) » Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:45 am

glowball (2): tclawren, gandalf5166
gandalf5166 (1): RisingPhoenix
kuribo (5): glowball, Farrun, Nobody Special, SpyreX, Lady Lambdadelta
SpyreX (1): Quilford
Lady Lambdadelta (1): Katsuki

Not voting: DeltaWave, kuribo

With

12

alive, it takes

7

to lynch!
Prodding tclawren.
Deadline for Day 1 is in (expired on 2011-10-02 15:00:00).

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #778 (ISO) » Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:48 am

Yeah, Kats. I'm scum because I voted into the claimed 1v1.

If this isn't a 1v1, I'm moving back to glowball.

kuribo · Post Post #779 (ISO) » Fri Sep 23, 2011 10:15 am

Townside Inventor

Night 1, I tried to pass on a cop investigation to Nexus. I'm betting that Kats saw me and is a scumside Tracker (since he probably forgot that we had a Watcher that died)

in short, get fucked

DeltaWave · Post Post #780 (ISO) » Fri Sep 23, 2011 11:48 am

Sigh, kuribo. You sound so scummy. I want to believe that you are a power-role but the way you have been conducting yourself really screams desperate scum to me, especially your posts on Page 31.

VOTE: Kuribo

kuribo · Post Post #781 (ISO) » Fri Sep 23, 2011 11:50 am

dont worry, dummy, there's plenty of room on my ass for more lips

kuribo · Post Post #782 (ISO) » Fri Sep 23, 2011 11:51 am

also, you forgot the bold tag, if you want to fuck up that bad, at least make it count. shit.

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #783 (ISO) » Fri Sep 23, 2011 11:54 am

KATSUKI, ARE YOU CLAIMING A GUILTY ON KURIBO. YES OR NO, NEXT POST.

Unvote

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #784 (ISO) » Fri Sep 23, 2011 11:55 am

EBWOP: Unvote to avoid a derp hammer

DeltaWave · Post Post #785 (ISO) » Fri Sep 23, 2011 11:57 am

In that case,

Vote: kuribo

kuribo · Post Post #786 (ISO) » Fri Sep 23, 2011 11:58 am

In post 400, kuribo wrote:w
tell me, what do you two add to this town? I know what gifts I give us: an inquisitive nature, a watchful eye, and a fierce aggression. To the players I feel are town, any of my traits could be a game changer.

and learn to read breadcrumbs you assfaces

Farrun · Post Post #787 (ISO) » Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:20 pm

Hahahahaha

unvote:
vote: LLD

@Kurbio: I think Kats was drawing attention to see whom responded and how. LLD and SpyreX both stated it was 1 vs 1 meaning they were willing to vote you and when you flipped town vote for Kats claiming he was scum making fake claims. They didn't think about another other possible things that could happen like if Kats was cop and you were to flip town that possible paranoid cop. Just 1 vs 1.

On a side not completely agree that Spy is scum too.

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #788 (ISO) » Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:30 pm

In post 787, Farrun wrote:Hahahahaha

unvote:
vote: LLD

@Kurbio: I think Kats was drawing attention to see whom responded and how. LLD and SpyreX both stated it was 1 vs 1 meaning they were willing to vote you and when you flipped town vote for Kats claiming he was scum making fake claims. They didn't think about another other possible things that could happen like if Kats was cop and you were to flip town that possible paranoid cop. Just 1 vs 1.

On a side not completely agree that Spy is scum too.

Cool, so Amrun is scum.

Amrun, don't try to tell you you don't treat guilties as 1v1 situations. It would be bastard for Reck to give a player a investigative role, and then not warn them their results are not reliable.

Basically, I was willing to lynch Kuribo if Kats had a guilty on him, because

it guarantees we lynch 1 scum.

The fact that you DIDN'T see it as a 1v1 means something. If this is a gambit by Katsuki, (which would look really town of him right now) then it's my belief Kuribo is town.

You NOT calling it a 1v1 reeks of inside information and wanting to stay clean off two potential town lynches.

Of course, this all depends on Kats actually pulling a gambit.

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #789 (ISO) » Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:37 pm

Oh, I forgot to add.

Vote: Amrun

This is 100% a perspective slip if both Kuribo and Katsuki are town.

Farrun · Post Post #790 (ISO) » Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:57 pm

In post 789, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Oh, I forgot to add.

Vote: Amrun

This is 100% a perspective slip if both Kuribo and Katsuki are town.

Hello OMGUS in progress.

Also not inside info I have a tendancy to look at what people do and have an idea what may or may not be correct.

Say 1 vs 1 hella scummy. Would you have considered had Kurbio flipped town and Kats claimed cop he was paranoid? You never mention it, you don't consider it and your willing to vote Kurbio for it.

Also trying to say oh is someone
BREADCRUMB A FUCKING ROLE AND MISSING IT AND HAVING MORE COMMON SENSE THEN NS MAKES YOU SCUMMY AS SHIT.

Farrun · Post Post #791 (ISO) » Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:59 pm

Nice that scum total misses the bold too.

In post 787, Farrun wrote:
@Kurbio:
I think
Kats was drawing attention to see whom responded and how. LLD and SpyreX both stated it was 1 vs 1 meaning they were willing to vote you and when you flipped town vote for Kats claiming he was scum making fake claims. They didn't think about another other possible things that could happen like if Kats was cop and you were to flip town that possible paranoid cop. Just 1 vs 1.

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #792 (ISO) » Fri Sep 23, 2011 3:00 pm

LOL @ AMRUN SCUM TRYING TO ARGUE THAT AN OUTSIDE ROLE MECHANIC POSSIBILITY MAKES MY THOUGHT PROCESS SCUMMY.

Farrun · Post Post #793 (ISO) » Fri Sep 23, 2011 3:06 pm

In post 792, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:LOL @ AMRUN SCUM TRYING TO ARGUE THAT AN OUTSIDE ROLE MECHANIC POSSIBILITY MAKES MY THOUGHT PROCESS SCUMMY.

LOL AT SCUM THINKING THEY KNOW WHO IS POSTING!

LOL AT SCUM NOT ANSWERING MY QUESTIONS EITHER!

LOOOOOKKKKK FAKE CAPS ATTACK FROM SCUM!

Farrun · Post Post #794 (ISO) » Fri Sep 23, 2011 3:08 pm

I also had a bunch of questions you ignored LL. Do you have a tendency to ignore questions asked from you or do you have no answer to them?

Farrun · Post Post #795 (ISO) » Fri Sep 23, 2011 3:11 pm

Still waiting for answers from these 2 questions you never answered from day 1.

farrun wrote:Glow wagon is over. Grim wagon is over. You want to get to a point if you have one or why you feel the need to not analysis the wagon you were on for reason's you have yet to say why.

You already have the I want to lynch CSL and Gand so what else is there.

You want to explain or keep saying hey I have a reason you just have to believe me?

In post 319, Farrun wrote:
In post 314, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Mothrax, why are you strawmanning my posts?

Do you not have anything more concrete to go on?

Please explain how Mothrax strawmaned your post.

All I see is you sitting your vote on Glow without making any cases on anyone and claiming your trying to guage people on reaction? their vote? Reasoning for their vote?
You voting for a scum suspect. Also I'm calling bs to you saying that your vote on Glow is still reaction considering after your vote on her you made 2 post pushing the case.

Tell me where I'm wrong.

@Glow: Sorry about posting from farside. Now that the hubby fixed the monitor I won't be in a hurry to just get a post for the day before leaving for work.

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #796 (ISO) » Fri Sep 23, 2011 3:13 pm

Mothrax strawmanned my posts by taking a false representation of them and attempting to make it the truth.

The CSL/Gand reads are basically based on reactions and voting patterns by the reaction tests I made. Further, a bit of GUT >=D here and there doesn't hurt.

SpyreX · Post Post #797 (ISO) » Fri Sep 23, 2011 3:31 pm

Kats comes in, derails glowball, calls Kurbo scum for a mystery, its obviously crap and then I'm scum for it?

YEP.

When glowball flips scum you're dead to rights Kat.

Unvote, Vote: glowball

On a different actual note - why Nexus?

glowball · Post Post #798 (ISO) » Fri Sep 23, 2011 3:39 pm

I STILL WANT MY ONE VERSUS ONE!

kuribo · Post Post #799 (ISO) » Fri Sep 23, 2011 4:47 pm

In post 788, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
Amrun, don't try to tell you you don't treat guilties as 1v1 situations. It would be bastard for Reck to give a player a investigative role, and then not warn them their results are not reliable.

oh please, there's no point to cop sanity if you actually tell the player that their results aren't 100% reliable

that's not bastard modding. that's the point of sanity.

and anyway, this is the most OMGUSy town i've ever seen