Open 347: White Flag Mafia (Game Over)

Fruit Basket · Post Post #150 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:20 pm

In post 141, Quilford wrote:VOTE: fatlikepig

language tell: 'reek'

are you just voting him for the use of the word reek or is it the overall language in the post? (because the latter is fairly valid, the former is borderline retarded)

Fruit Basket · Post Post #151 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:21 pm

Also amrum what did you mean by 'For your sake'?

Fruit Basket · Post Post #152 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:27 pm

In post 151, Fruit Basket wrote:Also amrum what did you mean by 'For your sake'?

Actually never mind this, you just didn't understand it. Derp.

Equinox · Post Post #153 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:38 pm

Unvote

I'll try to check in later tonight and see what's up here, but I've got some urgent business to take care of both on- and off-site, and this game is my last priority right now. Sorry. You'll hear from me tomorrow at the latest, though.

Amrun · Post Post #154 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:11 pm

In post 149, Fruit Basket wrote:My fucking point was I don't see why you as town would be thinking in terms of him being 'neutral at best', why the fuck would you think that? If you're voting someone who you presumably think is scum it doesn't make a lot of sense to me to think like that. I don't think the people I vote are 'neutral at best' I think their scumbags, I think your vote lacked conviction.

You misunderstand.

I

have a scumread on C_P. I meant that I don't understand anyone having anything more than a null read on him - in other words, I do not at all understand your townread on him.

And NS wagon is crap because not one person voting him is doing it for any valid reason.

fatlikepig · Post Post #155 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:12 pm

FB, why so defensive of Cross_Pollination? Also loving the casual push of the wagon on me without actually committing to it.

Analysis tonight when I get time.

Fruit Basket · Post Post #156 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:14 pm

I don't see what you don't understand - read his posts or something if you're confused.

And NS is scum, so yes that's a valid reason.

Fruit Basket · Post Post #157 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:16 pm

In post 155, fatlikepig wrote:FB, why so defensive of Cross_Pollination? Also loving the casual push of the wagon on me without actually committing to it.

I'm 'defensive' because I think he's town, and think the votes on him are without exception, garbage. Why are you asking me such a dumb question?

Amrun · Post Post #158 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:18 pm

Why are you being so confrontational, Fruit Basket?

Are you not revealing your heads because you decided you were going to be a complete asshole all game and didn't want your real accounts' reputations damaged?

Fruit Basket · Post Post #159 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:19 pm

Also give me the early posts that reek of scum, I doubt you missed the question. I can wait on 'analysis'.

fatlikepig · Post Post #160 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:19 pm

Why do you think he's town?

EBWOP: I'm on a phone. Hold your horses.

Nobody Special · Post Post #161 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:21 pm

FB, why am I scum?

Fruit Basket · Post Post #162 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:23 pm

In post 158, Amrun wrote:Why are you being so confrontational, Fruit Basket?

Are you not revealing your heads because you decided you were going to be a complete asshole all game and didn't want your real accounts' reputations damaged?

I don't care about my site rep - don't worry, it's good enough that being a prick in one game won't damage it anyway. I'd also take issue with the fact I'm being an asshole, go speak to the guys calling each other cunts or something, save me the spiel.

Fruit Basket · Post Post #163 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:24 pm

In post 160, fatlikepig wrote:Why do you think he's town?

His early posts fit with what I see more often in newbie town than newbie scum, he's inquisitive about the early wagon (which is actually fairly null), he then comes in and says he has no scum reads - remarkably honest, I don't think he'd be quite as blunt about that as scum. He's clearly not used to the meta on this site but given his actions and whatever I think he's town. What about my interpretation do you disagree with? I don't really need you to explain the posts you find scummy, I mostly just want ISO numbers as it sounded a hell of a lot like you were making stuff up.

Fruit Basket · Post Post #164 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:28 pm

In post 161, Nobody Special wrote:FB, why am I scum?

Your second, third and fifth(sorta) posts. I'm not explaining why you're scum, if people strongly disagree I can put forward my reasoning then - cases are inherently anti-town in general though.

fatlikepig · Post Post #165 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:28 pm

ISO posts 0-2 are scummy. Being wary of voting and saying and you don't have reads on anyone is dodgy.

He also apparently has experience on another forum. Means he's not a "newbie" per se, so I'm not incline to take that as an excuse.

Fruit Basket · Post Post #166 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:29 pm

In post 158, Amrun wrote:Why are you being so confrontational, Fruit Basket?

Oh missed this. Mostly because it's fun as fuck.

Fruit Basket · Post Post #167 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:32 pm

In post 165, fatlikepig wrote:ISO posts 0-2 are scummy. Being wary of voting and saying and you don't have reads on anyone is dodgy.

He also apparently has experience on another forum. Means he's not a "newbie" per se, so I'm not incline to take that as an excuse.

You can't compare the site to mafiascum without seeing it. Most sites play the game extremely differently, so he's a newbie to here.

Why do you think scum are more likely to be wary of voting? I actually don't think that's true, in general. it's also not very often scum out and admit they've no reads, it's certainly something I'd never do as scum - precisely because people

find

it scummy, when it's actually more likely to come from town (imo)

Fruit Basket · Post Post #168 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:32 pm

Eh, where did he say he had offsite experience?

Nobody Special · Post Post #169 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:32 pm

In post 164, Fruit Basket wrote:
In post 161, Nobody Special wrote:FB, why am I scum?

Your second, third and fifth(sorta) posts. I'm not explaining why you're scum, if people strongly disagree I can put forward my reasoning then -
cases are inherently anti-town in general though.

What the fuck is this bullshit??

Confirm Vote: Fruit Basket

Fruit Basket · Post Post #170 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:34 pm

Actually, Pig. Have you been posting from your phone often in this game so far?

Fruit Basket · Post Post #171 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:35 pm

In post 169, Nobody Special wrote:
In post 164, Fruit Basket wrote:
In post 161, Nobody Special wrote:FB, why am I scum?

Your second, third and fifth(sorta) posts. I'm not explaining why you're scum, if people strongly disagree I can put forward my reasoning then -
cases are inherently anti-town in general though.

What the fuck is this bullshit??

Confirm Vote: Fruit Basket

It's true, cases are anti-town. The best way to scumhunt is if town can come to a consensus through their own reasoning.

Amrun · Post Post #172 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:42 pm

In post 171, Fruit Basket wrote:It's true, cases are anti-town. The best way to scumhunt is if town can come to a consensus through their own reasoning.

a) dumb

b) NS disagreeing with you on failtheory is not at all scummy

Fruit Basket · Post Post #173 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:45 pm

I don't care about your opinions on mafia theory.

I'm not voting him based on theory anyway.. He's the one who confirmed his vote on me based on that. How did you so woefully misunderstand that?

Amrun · Post Post #174 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:50 pm

Because you didn't explain, and there are two possible explanations there.

I don't think NS' vote on you is valid, but I don't think it makes NS scummy, either.