crypto (5) -
Stringer Bell (2) -
Sinestro (2) -
Toogeloo (1) -
nopointinactingup (1) -
Bunnylover (1) -
Furcolow (1) -
Workdawg (1) -
Junpei (1) -
Not Voting (4) -
In post 160, Junpei wrote:Okay sly... uh.. so my mentioning MoI is what made me worthy of a vote?
I'd rather keep my cards close to my chest at this point.projectmatt wrote:Crypto, can you give me three town reads and the reasons for them quickly?
I'm fine with that. Partly because I don't care. Mostly because I'm not dignifying your demands that I waste my time justifying an early-game gut scum read like that.Junpei wrote:You would do good to actually respond, as it is very important, otherwise your entire foundation for your vote is compromised and you will look very bad.
In post 181, Junpei wrote:You would do good to actually respond, as it is very important, otherwise your entire foundation for your vote is compromised and you will look very bad.
projectmatt: explain your vote.
In post 183, crypto wrote:I'd rather keep my cards close to my chest at this point.projectmatt wrote:Crypto, can you give me three town reads and the reasons for them quickly?
In post 57, crypto wrote:
it's amazing, the way dropping capitalization and minimizing punctuation can change the tone of your posts
In post 72, crypto wrote:that was one of the weaker attempts at dodging questions i've seen in my time here.In post 69, Magister Ludi wrote:so you've established that i move quickly and unpredictably. why are you voting me? do you actually think i am mafia or is this a policy-type vote? if you think i am mafia, then what do you think is the secret scum agenda driving my play?
I like to know why you voted Magna, for starts.
In post 173, crypto wrote:http://mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 9#p3542099
http://mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 7#p3542117
There are my reasons for voting warriormode.
In post 196, FourseenCircumstance wrote:hmmm..... Ponder.....
Crypto is a pretty active player and that is very helpful for the town early on to generate discussion and what not so I'd like to see him stick around.....unvote
In post 75, Magister Ludi wrote:I like this StringerBell guy!
Yeah, warriormode's initial post was very worthy of a vote. I would say that crypto sprinting away from a warrior vote looks suspicious if warrior ever flips scum. (Its also possible crypto is trying to go with the idea that a lot of posts equal town, and is just posting high volumes to this end.)
In post 78, crypto wrote:okay, okay, magister ludi, you've cowed me into busing my scum mate. it's only page 3, so i'm confident enough that by the end of day one he'll have wormed his way out of getting lynched like all early-game obvious scum do, thanks to his own recovery as well as to the town's wondrous ability to overlook plain scummy behavior and instead obsess over ridiculous conspiracy theories.
unvote
vote: warriormode
what i have on magna is very thin, so this satisfies me.
preview edit:
i want to get a feel for your thought process. that's a cornerstone of effective scumhunting.magister ludi wrote:Crypto, why would you want me to explain why someone should be voted, if you agree that they should be voted?
enlighten me.magna wrote:You've presented what at this early stage is the scummiest post I have seen so far.