Random Mafia 2 Game Over

[three word name]

fine it isnt like there are enough active people to lynch me

unvote: three word name

[Mariyta]

fine it isnt like there are enough active people to lynch me

unvote: three word name

What an attitude.

[mathcam]

I think I might be leaning back toward WOLG. His first post just strikes me as so insincere...It really gave more of a feel of "Heh heh, the town should be

really

confused now" than a "Wow, that was unexpected." I'll switch back if it means a lynch, but for now I'll

Unvote, Vote: WOLG.

Cam

[three word name]

mod can we get some prods?

[Coron]

Players: can we get some votes on WOLG

[Mariyta]

What's the vote count?

[armlx]

Vote Count
WoLG- 2 (Coron, Mathcam)
m00c0w- 3 (Lloyd, Maritya, Ibaesha)
TWN- 2 (Hez, Turbo)

Not Voting: m00c0w, Viper, Coron, GreenLiquid, WoLG

12 alive, 7 to lynch

The following people are being prodded:

WoLG
Viper
m00
GL

Edit: Turbo is voting TWN and TWN isn't voting. I swapped the two on accident.

[Coron]

VC:
Votes on WOLG: not enough
Votes on other people: not important.

That is all important info.

[Mariyta]

Hmm... Nope. Have to say I'm ok w/ my vote as it stands.

[Coron]

I'm not.

[Turbovolver]

I'm voting three word name, aren't I? Did I forget to unvote?

[viper0933]

I'm here.

[GreenLiquid]

Sorry about being absent... totally forgot about replacing.

[WellofLostGnomes]

I'm sorry, I thought I had asked for a replacement about 2 weeks or more ago. I'll need one, I'm taking a break from mafia for a while.

[Coron]

Let's just lynch him and save the mod the trouble.

[WellofLostGnomes]

Ok, nevermind on the replacement. It seems like the only reason there is any pressure on me at all is because 1 player has voiced suspicion about the sincerity of one of my posts. I'll admit, looking back that seems very scummy if you don't know my alignment, but considering that I was actually suprised by that, it was unexpected.

There is no reason to lynch me based on that when other players have been under suspicion, it seems like some of the players are jumping around for ANY lynch regardless of who it is.

[Coron]

There are only 2 votes on you so far.

[Mariyta]

I don't think we should let Coron sidetrack everyone from the suspicion on Moo.

[Coron]

fine, don't forget WOLG or replacement for lynch tomorrow

unvote vote: moo

[WellofLostGnomes]

Ok, after re-reading the thread (a brief read) I noticed that I didn't really post an adaquate defense for the first post, and that seems to be the only reason people have repeatedly brought it up (These people being Coron, Mathcam, and Lloyd).

Being from MTG salvation, and only playing in about 7-ish games at that point, I had never seen a daykiller. I thought he was joking about the first daykill, and when he tried a second, I could NOT believe that a role like that could exist. After both kills went through, the only thing I could be was flabbergasted.

My first post was me saying that it was unfortunate that the first nightkill was not a double kill making a 1-for-1 trade. Because as I previously stated "Stating the obvious is as good as any for a first post."

[WellofLostGnomes]

Now, there is actually a decent case made on moocow, so I suggest we get back to "bandwagoning" as everyone wants to do, on someone who deserves it

I'll do a PBPA on llyoyd because I've gotten a really bad vibe with him wanting to jump on a lot of people, posting a confusing manner, to me anyway, and not really brining up any new, helpful, thoughts.

[three word name]

good idea

moo

[Turbovolver]

I still think three word name is a better target, but I have to do a re-read on Moo. All I remember is when I read the game through when replacing he wasn't one of the ones who stuck out to me as scummy.

[viper0933]

Where is flyingm00cow?

[three word name]

good idea

moo

forgot to put vote in there for some reason

vote: moocow