Finally i had time at work to do analysis, make relevant ISOs and reassess my reads.
Lastsurvivor
- town. Most of the time i agree with his logic, i really like the activity i see, and so far i have same scum reads. I don't agree with some of his town reads, but that is natural.
Fishythefish
- leaning town. I have similar view on almost all of his scum reads, and i admire his valiant attempt to make a deep analysis of Rhinox vs hiplop, i don't see scum doing it on day 1.
Sleepless Assassin
- neutral, leaning town. My read on him actually changed to a better side. It is more like overall impression, not that much to analyse yet, but i like those ISOs he did.
Rhinox
- neutral, leaning town. I really like his emotions and thoughts in #54, he had good questions and comments in some of his farther posts, but then he went into a clinch with hiplop, for "the vote switch for the reasons given, and reads that aren't explained or supported by his iso". I actually see that vote switch as not a big deal, and reads changes are not extreme.
hiplop
- neutral, slightly leaning town. He is a bit erratic, but feels natural. He is listening, adjusted his reads on SA, DDD, Nacho, yet is heavy locked on Rhinox for gut feeling and "trying pretty hard to paint me as scum". Some of the changes are instant, some gradual, like his read change on DDD:
218: "DDD feels independently scummy, some for his lurking, some for his actual posts."
272: "I used "maybe even DDD"...because my only thought on him is hes kinda lurky."
280: "DDD is based off of lurking. Its not a very strong tell. Very weak, infact."
320: "It was more of a case that i realized DDD was just lurking, so he moved up to null."
Nachomamma8
- neutral. Not much of a presence, some posts i like, some points i agree with, some disagree.
Vincent2128
- neutral, slightly leaning scum. Not much of a presence, too much of egocentricity, and i don't really understand his post 330 and unvote.
DDD
- neutral, slightly leaning scum. Before ISO all i could remember on him was "sitting on Nacho", after ISO i can add "Amished-tell". Not much to analyse. I remember him being more all over the place, but he was an IC in that game.
4nxi3ty
- slightly leaning scum. I don't agree with his thoughts, logic, and don't like votes without explanations, yet i know i cannot rely on his whole behavior (meta research, done in another game).
theomoaner
- leaning scum. My read on this slot was the same, and i am not impressed with theomoaner so far to change it.
funkybike1
- leaning scum. Said everything before, nothing changed.
Alicewondering
- scum. There is no need to repeat the points of Lastsurvivor and Fishythefish, after going through ISO several times i come to conclusion that they are valid. I don't like inconsistencies in what she is saying and what is is doing:
In post 329, Alicewondering wrote:At the moment, I'm more interested in DDD. He's showed very little effort in scumhunting,
which is not necessarily a scumtell
, but it is weird to me how he tunneled Nacho for so long, especially considering his case wasn't that great. He hasn't posted much more about his scumreads, even when asked.
VOTE: DDD
Your scumread (theomoaner) does 180 on you, and instead of questioning him you switch to someone, you are not even sure is scummy?
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Alicewondering
theomoaner
, can you explain your thought process behind your 180 on Alice? In one day you went from
"Her posts feel like "the voice of reason". She seems to be analysing what others are posting and to try to help others think through their ideas (for example post 148). I can't see scum doing this."
to a vote on her. I agree with the result, but don't understand the process yet.
I ignored
Rhinox vs hiplop
for a time, because i was pretty sure this will die soon. Since this isn't the case, i think that
both of you should take a break for a time
, look around for other suspects, and reassess the reads on each other.
