Needs emphasis.
mcqueen wrote:He needs death - today, before any more trouble is caused.
In post 424, Bunnylover wrote:Sorry for my absent, a little hectic in my life atm.
In post 396, projectmatt wrote:Pine -I forgot to ask, is it possible to paraphrase or quote things from the QT or is that against the guidelines? I can't find anything regarding it in the game rules. I think it would be a gigantic help if you could paraphrase some of the things Bunny said, but yeah
This is what I said summary (in case I'm not allowed to copy+paste):
I claimed I was not scum.
Wonder why Pine was so jumpy to start calling someone scum
I explained what would happen if we assume one of us is scum, saying that the QT will be pointless
Then said that I would like to have someone to reflect ideas off, then decided on his alignment.
Thats all I said.
In post 429, Oversoul wrote:Knox, who did you replace?
BL, why did you decide on his alignment/what was your reasoning for deciding on his alignment?
In post 429, Oversoul wrote:Knox, who did you replace?
BL, why did you decide on his alignment/what was your reasoning for deciding on his alignment?
In post 428, knox wrote:In post 424, Bunnylover wrote:Sorry for my absent, a little hectic in my life atm.
In post 396, projectmatt wrote:Pine -I forgot to ask, is it possible to paraphrase or quote things from the QT or is that against the guidelines? I can't find anything regarding it in the game rules. I think it would be a gigantic help if you could paraphrase some of the things Bunny said, but yeah
This is what I said summary (in case I'm not allowed to copy+paste):
I claimed I was not scum.
Wonder why Pine was so jumpy to start calling someone scum
I explained what would happen if we assume one of us is scum, saying that the QT will be pointless
Then said that I would like to have someone to reflect ideas off, then decided on his alignment.
Thats all I said.
Pine do you agree with this? ^
In post 432, Pine wrote:Apologies for my recent absence, I've had very limited access to the site in the last few days. It's been site-wide, confirm here if need be.
In post 428, knox wrote:In post 424, Bunnylover wrote:Sorry for my absent, a little hectic in my life atm.
In post 396, projectmatt wrote:Pine -I forgot to ask, is it possible to paraphrase or quote things from the QT or is that against the guidelines? I can't find anything regarding it in the game rules. I think it would be a gigantic help if you could paraphrase some of the things Bunny said, but yeah
This is what I said summary (in case I'm not allowed to copy+paste):
I claimed I was not scum.
Wonder why Pine was so jumpy to start calling someone scum
I explained what would happen if we assume one of us is scum, saying that the QT will be pointless
Then said that I would like to have someone to reflect ideas off, then decided on his alignment.
Thats all I said.
Pine do you agree with this? ^
More or less. BL has of course portrayed it in the perspective that gives the benefit of the doubt to him, but those are the basic facts. I began with saying that I suspected him, he pled "why can't we just get along" and that confirmed my suspicions that he wanted to use the thread to manipulate me. Town has no use for a Town-Scum Neighborhood, only scum does.
Still good on a BB lynch, Sly or BL are also acceptable.
In post 425, mcqueen wrote:RE-VOTE: Pine.
Needs emphasis.
mcqueen wrote:He needs death - today, before any more trouble is caused.
In post 437, Pine wrote:McQueen, what "trouble" have I caused? And why is "trouble" a bad thing?
In post 439, Pine wrote:I'm still comfortable being lynched, as long as Bunny is auto-lynched upon my Town flip. You willing to promise this?
In post 441, Pine wrote:Arright, so your argument then is to lynch me because I've annoyed and mocked you. I could forgive it if you thought there was a Town/Scum Neighbor dichotomy and had concluded that I was the Scum Neighbor, but you're just a butthurt ten-year-old.
McQueen has absolutely no credibility in my eyes anymore, and I will be making every effort not to engage in his ego-stroking until he grows the fuck up.
In post 427, knox wrote:
I wonder why bunny never mentioned/confirmed the pairing in day 1, thinking maybe she was trying to distance herself from her partner.
In post 427, knox wrote:
I don’t like how Sly is tunnelling on NM over the possible mason soft claim. It is unhelpful for everyone, especially the players who have replaced in and weren’t there for the event. I would understand one or two posts to make sure everyone knew about your suspicions and would take it under consideration but it would also help if you gave your opinion on the events happening in this thread.
Pretty much all of your posts are about the mason claim, apart from voting DG after he claimed and the questions about why you voted him. Why not give opinions about anything else? You are following the thread, popping into answer questions whenever they come so why the lurking?
In post 442, mcqueen wrote:In post 441, Pine wrote:Arright, so your argument then is to lynch me because I've annoyed and mocked you. I could forgive it if you thought there was a Town/Scum Neighbor dichotomy and had concluded that I was the Scum Neighbor, but you're just a butthurt ten-year-old.
McQueen has absolutely no credibility in my eyes anymore, and I will be making every effort not to engage in his ego-stroking until he grows the fuck up.
I am not 10. I am not butthurt. I am not looking to ego-stroke. I will not give up.
You are scum. You can leave. You can get lynched. You can lose.
In post 445, BBmolla wrote:In post 442, mcqueen wrote:In post 441, Pine wrote:Arright, so your argument then is to lynch me because I've annoyed and mocked you. I could forgive it if you thought there was a Town/Scum Neighbor dichotomy and had concluded that I was the Scum Neighbor, but you're just a butthurt ten-year-old.
McQueen has absolutely no credibility in my eyes anymore, and I will be making every effort not to engage in his ego-stroking until he grows the fuck up.
I am not 10. I am not butthurt. I am not looking to ego-stroke. I will not give up.
You are scum. You can leave. You can get lynched. You can lose.
This is probably the only time I actually agree with Mcqueen. Insulting Mcqueen only makesmy penime vote you harder.
In post 441, Pine wrote:Arright, so your argument then is to lynch me because I've annoyed and mocked you. I could forgive it if you thought there was a Town/Scum Neighbor dichotomy and had concluded that I was the Scum Neighbor, but you're just a butthurt ten-year-old.
McQueen has absolutely no credibility in my eyes anymore, and I will be making every effort not to engage in his ego-stroking until he grows the fuck up.
In post 447, Bunnylover wrote:In post 441, Pine wrote:Arright, so your argument then is to lynch me because I've annoyed and mocked you. I could forgive it if you thought there was a Town/Scum Neighbor dichotomy and had concluded that I was the Scum Neighbor, but you're just a butthurt ten-year-old.
McQueen has absolutely no credibility in my eyes anymore, and I will be making every effort not to engage in his ego-stroking until he grows the fuck up.
This is the problem right here.
You got it so stuck in your head that someone has to be scum in the neighbor that you refuse to consider anything else.
Holding onto site meta is going to get you lynched, and if your town you need to stop.