In post 506, knox wrote:Why do you think Andy needs to be looked at?
His actions look like posturing.
Although I think something is going on between a few players and I'm keeping an eye open...
NS)TST>AS
^ for future reference
In post 506, knox wrote:Why do you think Andy needs to be looked at?
In post 649, knox wrote:
Could you tell us why you think Andy is a miller? Where were you at the end of day 2?
In post 641, projectmatt wrote:Give me an hour or two.
kondi wrote:Could you please explain the BL and Andy town?
In post 615, kondi2424 wrote:@mastin: No, you are not confirmed by that. Sly was a Traitor, so he might not have known the scumteam.
kondi wrote:First thing's first; why do you feel BB-town?
kondi wrote:Third, that is assuming that I, as Mafia, knew Sly was a Traitor and tried to save him when I had been pushing on him earlier. We don't know if the Mafia knew about Sly. Are Traitors usually outed to their Mafia group?
Bunnylover wrote:If we are playing the game of PoE, I would rather go with Chk then BBM. BBM I haven't seen or been convinced that he is scum.
In post 651, Twistedspoon wrote:In post 649, knox wrote:
Could you tell us why you think Andy is a miller? Where were you at the end of day 2?
I don't want to talk about it until my question to him is first answered.
End of D2? I was busy over Easter. I apologise greatly and recognise it has hurt my read but there is little I can do about it now and accept it as fair.
(more later tonight)
In post 610, kondi2424 wrote:
First point: My annoyance was specifically with the third question. You asked him to consider that Damon might be town, but youdidn'task of Sly the same.
Second point: Okay
Third point: As I had said at the top of the post, I was pointing out what I saw as I read through the game.
In post 617, Twistedspoon wrote:Okay. One thing first. This needs getting off of my chest.
Andy, are you a Miller?
TS wrote:so there's absolutely no reason why you'd investigate to get a guilty?
In post 656, knox wrote:Also why did you ask andy if he was a miller?
In post 654, Twistedspoon wrote:
I didn't ask fro a fullclaim >_>
so there's absolutely no reason why you'd investigate to get a guilty?
In post 658, Twistedspoon wrote:So I asked Andy if he was a Miller. Why? I recalled the tactic from a a game which I played last May about a year ago when Faraday tried a similar gambit here and here
Of course in that game Faraday wasn't a cop and nor am I in this game (which should be obvious from the DG flip). However that's the appeal of the gambit I wanted to try. Basically if a scum gets a guilty claimed on them then they have little they can do; they can either get lynched or claim miller and at least hope to delay their lynch. If I ask someone directly if they're a miller then as scum they would be quite cautious as they'd know they'd investigate as a guilty from a cop investigation so would have to claim miller were a guilty found on them. Of course it's a bluff though. If you can get a scum to claim miller without actually knowing he's a miller then the bluff is followed through and it's quite likely that a mafiosi is caught.
However the gambit is weak in this game because a cop already flipped. it'd have been easy to see through the bluff. Still, I wanted to try it as it's something which I fondly recalled from that prior game and never had the chance to do it and catch a scum yet.
Of course that doesn't mean I find Andy suspect . Far from it
@mod: OP needs updating
In post 661, knox wrote:In post 658, Twistedspoon wrote:So I asked Andy if he was a Miller. Why? I recalled the tactic from a a game which I played last May about a year ago when Faraday tried a similar gambit here and here
Of course in that game Faraday wasn't a cop and nor am I in this game (which should be obvious from the DG flip). However that's the appeal of the gambit I wanted to try. Basically if a scum gets a guilty claimed on them then they have little they can do; they can either get lynched or claim miller and at least hope to delay their lynch. If I ask someone directly if they're a miller then as scum they would be quite cautious as they'd know they'd investigate as a guilty from a cop investigation so would have to claim miller were a guilty found on them. Of course it's a bluff though. If you can get a scum to claim miller without actually knowing he's a miller then the bluff is followed through and it's quite likely that a mafiosi is caught.
However the gambit is weak in this game because a cop already flipped. it'd have been easy to see through the bluff. Still, I wanted to try it as it's something which I fondly recalled from that prior game and never had the chance to do it and catch a scum yet.
Of course that doesn't mean I find Andy suspect . Far from it
@mod: OP needs updating
Why andy?
In post 393, BBmolla wrote:BL seems townier than Pine imo. I don't understand why people think Pine is town because "BL is scum" when BL seems town to me.
In post 417, BBmolla wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Pine
I prefer this over BL lynch.
We have four days folks, we need to figure out who we're lynching so we can deal with claiming.
In post 659, Oversoul wrote:In lieu of Twisted's revelation, Nacho, why did you come to Andy's defense so quickly?