Worst Role Mafia - GAME OVER!

BBmolla · Post Post #700 (ISO) » Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:10 am

This Phil wagon sucks testicles.

saulres · Post Post #701 (ISO) » Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:17 am

In post 698, Phillammon wrote:Looks like I'm toast.

Four votes out of 11 does not a lynch make.

In post 700, BBmolla wrote:This Phil wagon sucks testicles.

Why? I see two things which make it a good choice:

1) Scummy behavior
2) If claim is true, detrimental to town.

BBmolla · Post Post #702 (ISO) » Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:24 am

In post 701, saulres wrote:1) Scummy behavior

I don't think he's acted scummy at all.

As a note, I expect the mafia to start killing all the active players, leaving us in LYLO with a bunch of lurkers. Tierce is going to yell at me for this(she thinks me wanting to lynch lurkers is a scumtell), but we really should be lynching scum lurkers in the next few days.

Captain Haddock · Post Post #703 (ISO) » Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:29 am

In post 699, BBmolla wrote:Haddock I've already addressed that your "case" is awful.

I wanted to quicklynch because:
A. Modconfirmed scum
B. Didn't want my recruit to have to read eleventeen hundred pages to catch up.

I wasn't rolefishing, I was trying to determine if:
A. The masons were worst because one of them is scum.
B. The masons were worst because they have some side ability that makes them worst.

That's kind of fucking important.

No you ignored it. (Skim from post 600 everyone else)

That's hardly half of my case and doesn't answer what first appeared in it but I will respond.

A. There's no benefit to quicklynching compared to lynching later, and you argued the pros if 2birds was town.
B. Is the most ridiculous excuse I've ever read. Why not quicklynch every game to be nice to replacements

A and B. They should be read individually and a townie wouldn't want that information till a mass claim.

Fuck it, VOTE: BBmolla

saulres · Post Post #704 (ISO) » Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:29 am

Nothing in here to convince you? He's active lurking.

I disagree with Tierce on that comment, BTW. In my experience I've caught several scum lurking. It depends what they're doing elsewhere on site. If they're not doing anything, let them live. If they're posting up a storm elsewhere but not here -- that's always been, for me, a scumtell.

Oversoul · Post Post #705 (ISO) » Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:19 am

Actually... I have a question.

Tierce were you given a worst role PM or a just a generic PM?

BBmolla, you aren't exactly trying to push for another lynch (despite being on my wagon) or at least none that I can see in the last two pages.

ManiacalLemon · Post Post #706 (ISO) » Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:06 am

VOTE: Phil
Self explanatory.

Phillammon · Post Post #707 (ISO) » Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:31 am

In post 706, ManiacalLemon wrote:VOTE: Phil
Self explanatory.

No, no it isn't. Don't just sheep or parrot out the party line, what are

your

reasons?

BBmolla · Post Post #708 (ISO) » Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:56 am

In post 703, Captain Haddock wrote:A. There's no benefit to quicklynching compared to lynching later, and you argued the pros if 2birds was town.
B. Is the most ridiculous excuse I've ever read. Why not quicklynch every game to be nice to replacements

A proved that roles are possibly bastard. This is really fucking important.
B, replacements voluntarily join a game, I recruited Tierce, meaning she just got thrown a PM(according to her she wasn't even asked if she wanted to play). Wouldn't you be upset if you got a role PM for a game you didn't sign up for and had to read 30 pages to catch up?

Your arguments are shit Haddock.

Oversoul wanna lynch Haddock with me?

BBmolla · Post Post #709 (ISO) » Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:56 am

VOTE: ManiacalLemon

Amrun · Post Post #710 (ISO) » Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:56 am

.... why would you do that

BBmolla · Post Post #711 (ISO) » Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:57 am

In post 704, saulres wrote:I disagree with Tierce on that comment, BTW. In my experience I've caught several scum lurking. It depends what they're doing elsewhere on site. If they're not doing anything, let them live. If they're posting up a storm elsewhere but not here -- that's always been, for me, a scumtell.

No, I mean for me personally as a scumtell, not a scumtell in general. Sorry that I didn't make that clear.

In Warlocks and Werewolves I just pushed for a lurker lynch the entire time, and her scumtell on me has spawned from there.

Phillammon · Post Post #712 (ISO) » Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:57 am

In post 708, BBmolla wrote:
In post 703, Captain Haddock wrote:A. There's no benefit to quicklynching compared to lynching later, and you argued the pros if 2birds was town.
B. Is the most ridiculous excuse I've ever read. Why not quicklynch every game to be nice to replacements

A proved that roles are possibly bastard. This is really fucking important.
B, replacements voluntarily join a game, I recruited Tierce, meaning she just got thrown a PM(according to her she wasn't even asked if she wanted to play). Wouldn't you be upset if you got a role PM for a game you didn't sign up for and had to read 30 pages to catch up?

Your arguments are shit Haddock.

Oversoul wanna lynch Haddock with me?

In post 709, BBmolla wrote:VOTE: ManiacalLemon

Wait, what?

BBmolla · Post Post #713 (ISO) » Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:58 am

In post 706, ManiacalLemon wrote:VOTE: Phil
Self explanatory.

@Amrun

Amrun · Post Post #714 (ISO) » Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:58 am

Why would you vote for ML?

YOU JUST WASTED YOUR VOTE FOR THE WHOLE DAY.

BBmolla · Post Post #715 (ISO) » Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:58 am

Oh balls he's the vote magnet.

BBmolla · Post Post #716 (ISO) » Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:58 am

I forgot ML was even in this game, let alone his role.

Phillammon · Post Post #717 (ISO) » Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:59 am

Ah, right. Yeah. You could have mentioned, mind...

PEdit: Whew, thanks for catching that- I nearly did the same... also, vote magnetism as listed in the original thread is *permanent*, not just for the day...

BBmolla · Post Post #718 (ISO) » Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:00 am

In post 30, ManiacalLemon wrote:Votes will stay on me just for the day.

At least it's not that bastard.

But yeah I fucked up.

BBmolla · Post Post #719 (ISO) » Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:01 am

Phil your thoughts on Haddock's case?

BBmolla · Post Post #720 (ISO) » Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:02 am

Hey ML can you be more active so scum will actually night kill you

IceGuy · Post Post #721 (ISO) » Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:04 am

In post 715, BBmolla wrote:Oh balls he's the vote magnet.

In post 716, BBmolla wrote:I forgot ML was even in this game, let alone his role.

What?

Amrun · Post Post #722 (ISO) » Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:05 am

In post 720, BBmolla wrote:Hey ML can you be more active so scum will actually night kill you

Why would scum ever do that?

Phillammon · Post Post #723 (ISO) » Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:08 am

On Haddock's case:

Point 1 seems actually pretty good. Pushing a quicklynch is not really justifiable unless it's instant night and the scum appear to be lurking, regardless of how weird the game may be.
Point 2 I've already made my position clear on. He's disregarding what was actually said in favour of subtext. Subtext, I hasten to add, utterly contradicted by said actual wording. I'm willing to take it on face value.
Points 3 and 4 I'm not seeing the real scum implications of. I'm aware that faking a PR is nearly on par for LaL, and I know that your role was hard to crumb, but haddock's case there seems like a bit of an overreaction. I personally still think that Molla is town, but all the same haddock doesn't jump out as me as scum either.

BBmolla · Post Post #724 (ISO) » Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:09 am

In post 721, IceGuy wrote:
In post 715, BBmolla wrote:Oh balls he's the vote magnet.

In post 716, BBmolla wrote:I forgot ML was even in this game, let alone his role.

What?

...I don't know how much better I can explain this. I forgot ML was in the game so I forgot he claimed vote magnet.

@Haddock

: What is your read on Oversoul?