In post 747, BBmolla wrote:In post 745, Amrun wrote:Why should I have to tell you that?
I want to know what you think it is. Because clearly we have to different ideas about what it is in mind.
That balance makes you town. It clearly doesn't.
In post 747, BBmolla wrote:In post 745, Amrun wrote:Why should I have to tell you that?
I want to know what you think it is. Because clearly we have to different ideas about what it is in mind.
In post 750, Amrun wrote:In post 747, BBmolla wrote:In post 745, Amrun wrote:Why should I have to tell you that?
I want to know what you think it is. Because clearly we have to different ideas about what it is in mind.
That balance makes you town. It clearly doesn't.
In post 639, BBmolla wrote:-If I was scum, then odds are she wouldn't be once I recruited her. A fucking scum recruiter would be so game breaking it's not even funny.
-If I was scum, I wouldn't recruit the player who can read me perfectly, that's like asking to get lynched.
-If I was scum, why the hell would I bring in a player who can actually scumhunt? I mean, look at the players in this game, more than half the game is inactive pretty much. How would that benefit me?
-If I was scum, why the hell would I go against what I said I was going to do and bring attention to me?
-If I was scum, why would I fake a post restriction lazily to the point where it was obviously fake?
In post 751, Amrun wrote:Also that your first recruit was more likely to be town. that's just bullshit.
In post 748, BBmolla wrote:In post 738, PokerFace wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong but you said this before you ever acted worried about recruiting scum. yay I'm not buying this. Gonna keep reading and writing though in case I find a better case. Might have a beer while I do it too.
WHAT YOU QUOTED HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH RECRUITING SCUM
WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT
In post 752, BBmolla wrote:In post 750, Amrun wrote:In post 747, BBmolla wrote:In post 745, Amrun wrote:Why should I have to tell you that?
I want to know what you think it is. Because clearly we have to different ideas about what it is in mind.
That balance makes you town. It clearly doesn't.
Balance isn't what makes me town, this is:
In post 639, BBmolla wrote:-If I was scum, then odds are she wouldn't be once I recruited her. A fucking scum recruiter would be so game breaking it's not even funny.
-If I was scum, I wouldn't recruit the player who can read me perfectly, that's like asking to get lynched.
-If I was scum, why the hell would I bring in a player who can actually scumhunt? I mean, look at the players in this game, more than half the game is inactive pretty much. How would that benefit me?
-If I was scum, why the hell would I go against what I said I was going to do and bring attention to me?
-If I was scum, why would I fake a post restriction lazily to the point where it was obviously fake?
^Only the first bullet has to do with balance.
In post 753, BBmolla wrote:In post 751, Amrun wrote:Also that your first recruit was more likely to be town. that's just bullshit.
Do you think Tierce is scum?
In post 754, BBmolla wrote:Amrun why do you think I'm scum?
In post 741, BBmolla wrote:In post 732, Captain Haddock wrote:This is the first time he called me scum, coincidently after I was put under a little pressure. I expect he was hoping I would go off him when he first responded to me, because before then he didn't give an opinion at all. This blatent opportunism was also ignored.
Your case is such complete shit and ignored players who were doing scummier things, which is why I voted you. I have a hard time telling between dumb and scum.
In post 732, Captain Haddock wrote:If BBmolla was trying to draw the nighkill, why has he posted 0 reasons for lynching anyone? Whenever he's voted since the guilty child his "reasoning" was some variation of:"his posts suck", even though his own posts were rolefishing, fluff and going on about his role.
If you're not a god damned PR you shouldALWAYSbe trying to draw the nightkill. What does my reasons for voting have to do with drawing the nightkill?
In post 760, Captain Haddock wrote:
Scratch that! Oversoul's question escaped my attention because I looked at BB's posts to reply to then went to bed,null/null-scum because I have no other reasons to suspect him.
In post 726, Amrun wrote:Oh, by the way, maniacal lemon is the only role so far that I can't see scum ever getting EVER - it's terrible for town, but absolutely game-breaking for scum.
That being said, I wish he'd be useful.
p-edit: Yes, that role sounds much more reasonable, balance-wise.
In post 726, Amrun wrote:Oh, by the way, maniacal lemon is the only role so far that I can't see scum ever getting EVER - it's terrible for town, but absolutely game-breaking for scum.
In post 763, Tierce wrote:In post 726, Amrun wrote:Oh, by the way, maniacal lemon is the only role so far that I can't see scum ever getting EVER - it's terrible for town, but absolutely game-breaking for scum.
Why? He's a vote magnet, but he's not unlynchable.
In post 734, Oversoul wrote:Tierce, I wouldn't have asked you to, slumlord.
In post 739, Gimmicky Alt wrote:/prod recieved
In post 762, Agent_Ireland wrote:So I'm just gonna VOTE: NumberQ
In post 762, Agent_Ireland wrote:Normally, I'd agree with this, but isn't this a bastard game and wasn't the mod confirmed scum at the beginning town? Just saying.
In post 762, Agent_Ireland wrote:In post 726, Amrun wrote:Oh, by the way, maniacal lemon is the only role so far that I can't see scum ever getting EVER - it's terrible for town, but absolutely game-breaking for scum.
That being said, I wish he'd be useful.
p-edit: Yes, that role sounds much more reasonable, balance-wise.
Normally, I'd agree with this, but isn't this a bastard game and wasn't the mod confirmed scum at the beginning town? Just saying.
As to everything else that happened, I have no clue. So I'm just gonna VOTE: NumberQ or his replacement because I'm not sure what to do right now.
In post 765, saulres wrote:@BB: I'm backing off my scumread on your because I'm being swayed by some of your arguments (in particular, those in 639). I still don't think it was pro-town to have brought insomeone like Tiercebased completely on speculation that she'd be town-aligned, though. Better to bring in someone who when they're scum, they're obvscum, in my opinion.
In post 765, saulres wrote:@Tierce: Convince me about Oversoul. (Although don't, really, because this is close to my last post, excluding short ones, in this game before V/LA, especially with the extended deadline.)