In post 2499, Staeg wrote:In post 2498, Zdenek wrote:and post hammer vote on Fritz is a concern.
Why is the post-hammer vote on fritz bad?
It's a concern because he was watching the wagon, it seemed like he was planning to hammer, he didn't hammer, but then felt the need to vote after. I think this sequence of events is weird. There are basically two possibilities he miscounted the votes or he was hoping the wagon wouldn't go to completion, but wanted to make sure that it was clear that he was willing to vote Fritz. I can't know which is the case.
In post 2500, TeChNoWC wrote:In post 2498, Zdenek wrote:On the current people being pushed:
The only point about the bbmolla wagon that I think holds water is that that Rhinox was suspicious of him. The points against him dont't really separate him from anyone else.
I think Techno is scum, mostly because of his play since we've had two scum lynches and that fact that Rhinox was suspicious of him is a good poiint.
I am less certain about Spyrex. The fact that he's decided to only post hammers is annoying, and post hammer vote on Fritz is a concern.
Vote: Techno
And you think as scum I would kill off two people who were supposedly chasing me? (even though they clearly weren't).
My play has been sus lately I agree, but only because I am less confident in my ability to read this game. I have been wrong about every lynch so far.
I would have thought I would be more useful in the final fourteen but I doubt I'll make it or have trust either way now. If you want to lynch me that's fine, because I have no strong tells anymore. Lurker lynch or those connected to the two scum is all I have to go on. I will say though that lynching from connections to the NK's is dumb, as its all WIFOM and scum would rather set townies up than leave a trail of dead bodies that point to them.
Your first question is WIFOM. As to your second point:
In post 879, imaginality wrote:Next reads:
++ redff - not a fan of the one-liner posting style but I get the sense from his posts that he's genuinely thinking and questioning, so that gives me a town feel...
+ SleepyKrew - unvoting due to absence gave me a good vibe, I feel like as scum he wouldn't necessarily have bothered to unvote...
+ Rhinox - lots of strategy, and policy votes, but good reasons for both, and I like that the reads he gave in 668 weren't just sheeping other people's suspects...
+ BBMolla - in a game with 50 players and 10 to lynch, I don't think scum would be so bold to throw out the "meh I don't care if I get lynched" line
=+ Zdenek - I agree with his reads particularly elmo, T-bone and Muffin...
= UberNinja - having fun isn't a scum tell; sure Uber could be doing more scumhunting, but since this is a 50-player game, I'm happy to give players who make me laugh leeway at this point, and focus on hunting the non-funny scum instead...
= SpyreX - his playstyle always gives me a baseline pro-town sense. This game he comes off as slightly less engaged than other games I've been in with him but on the other hand the rate of posting this game is crazy so I think that's pretty null right now. Definitely want to wait til the dust settles and see how he plays when we're not posting 25 pages a day
=- Captain Corporal - more please...
- MoS - one post, no content. Dislike the "I'm not going to read anything" approach: @MoS you don't need to read the whole game, just read the last page or so and look for scummy posts there...
- Robotnick2 - first post suggests he is or at least was paying slight attention to the game, so why didn't he give us anything more than that?
Yeah, not keen on this UberNinja wagon.
Of the above players, and yesterday's, I'd be fine with a Robotnick2 wagon if we want to lynch someone low-contributing.
But right now I want to
VOTE: TeChNoWC
for his fence-sitting and buddying. He seems like he's trying to get on everyone's good side, and his posts don't ring sincere to me. I'm interested to hear what others think.
In post 1745, Rhinox wrote:In post 1710, TeChNoWC wrote:Not sure lynching lurkers will get us anywhere.
In post 1710, TeChNoWC wrote:I don't mind thinning him and seeing what we get; good chance he is one of the scummy lurkers.
Unvote
Vote: Lowman
This looks like a big contradiction. Like, you just said you didn't think it would get us anywhere but you did it anyways.
In post 1715, Rhinox wrote:In post 1710, TeChNoWC wrote:
Not sure lynching lurkers will get us anywhere. You feel it is hard to find scum in this setup, yet you think lynching lurkers will help us hit scum?
Still, lowman is a PL loving, wagon jumping, happy to kill town lurker scummy.
I don't mind thinning him and seeing what we get; good chance he is one of the scummy lurkers.
Unvote
Vote: Lowman
This is a bad post.
Do think there was any reason for the NK choices?
I'd be okay with lynching Zoraster, but I don't really want to go back to lynching the lurkers yet.
