![Image](http://i.imgur.com/7ETdl.jpg)
This is not the Thor you are looking for.
In post 40, Thor665 wrote:
Why aren't you voting right now - do you consider yourself as being overly conservative?
In post 51, Thor665 wrote: But last I checked, the point was to lynch scum, not attack my town reads...oh, wait, unless you're scum, so...yeah.
In post 49, Thor665 wrote:
@Robo - yeah, but I need some more sheep to finish you off. You do need to die for this gambit because it's a pretty 'meh' gambit to begin with, you're already past the point of it being useful, andit will amuse me to kill you regardless of your alignment.
In post 56, RXK wrote:In post 40, Thor665 wrote:
Why aren't you voting right now - do you consider yourself as being overly conservative?
I consider myself to be like 3 pages into the game. If you're gonna call me out for not voting right now then apparently six other players are being overly conservative too.
In post 60, RXK wrote:Are you more of a guy who would rather use them liberally or no? I guess this may be a stupid question because you do have a vote already, but I guess I'm asking what your policy is about it.
In post 68, 194 wrote:Not that much. I'm still impressed at Robo's ability to not give a S*rf about the votes of others over him.
In post 68, 194 wrote:Also, [Thor's] reasoning about Hoss being townie seems consistant.
In post 68, 194 wrote:And yeah, we need actions from zabriel and Iknal. I considered myself inactive but those two together have posted less than me.
In post 65, 194 wrote:Please do, before someone decides to speedlynch Robo.
In post 69, Thor665 wrote:
In post 68, 194 wrote:Not that much. I'm still impressed at Robo's ability to not give a S*rf about the votes of others over him.
Pssh - we haven't even remotely got tat fire burning yet. You should vote him and see if he stays cool as a cucumber.
Could work. I will give it some thoughts
In post 68, 194 wrote:Also, [Thor's] reasoning about Hoss being townie seems consistant.
Consistent with what?
Probably badly worded from me. I was trying to say that reasoning didn't look flawed to me.
In post 68, 194 wrote:And yeah, we need actions from zabriel and Iknal. I considered myself inactive but those two together have posted less than me.
Do you find that scummy of them?
Do you find anything scummy yet?
zabriel hasn't posted anything and that can't be qualified in any way. Iknal could be lurking, however, as he has effectively posted but not really contributed. That could be considered scum activity. I will wait for his next post, assuming it happens anytime soon.
In post 65, 194 wrote:Please do, before someone decides to speedlynch Robo.
![]()
That would bother you? He's even voting himself, so he agrees with the case on him as well.
As I was saying before, I still think Robo is townie. However, yeah, he doesn't seem to care about his own life. I won't vote him yet, but once again, I could end up giving that a try.
In post 65, 194 wrote:Please do, before someone decides to speedlynch Robo.
194 wrote:Not that much. I'm still impressed at Robo's ability to not give a f*ck about the votes of others over him. However, his gambit is basically useless now as it was already pointed out as that: a gambit (and a gambit needs to keep occult in order to work). I still think he's not scum, however.
So, Thor is qualified as experienced? Sorry, I still need some time to grow accustomed to this site's nomenclatures. Also, his reasoning about Hoss being townie seems consistant.
And yeah, we need actions from zabriel and Iknal. I considered myself inactive but those two together have posted less than me.
194 wrote:In post 69, Thor665 wrote:
In post 68, 194 wrote:Not that much. I'm still impressed at Robo's ability to not give a S*rf about the votes of others over him.
Pssh - we haven't even remotely got tat fire burning yet. You should vote him and see if he stays cool as a cucumber.
Could work. I will give it some thoughts
In post 68, 194 wrote:Also, [Thor's] reasoning about Hoss being townie seems consistant.
Consistent with what?
Probably badly worded from me. I was trying to say that reasoning didn't look flawed to me.
In post 68, 194 wrote:And yeah, we need actions from zabriel and Iknal. I considered myself inactive but those two together have posted less than me.
Do you find that scummy of them?
Do you find anything scummy yet?
zabriel hasn't posted anything and that can't be qualified in any way. Iknal could be lurking, however, as he has effectively posted but not really contributed. That could be considered scum activity. I will wait for his next post, assuming it happens anytime soon.
In post 65, 194 wrote:Please do, before someone decides to speedlynch Robo.
![]()
That would bother you? He's even voting himself, so he agrees with the case on him as well.
As I was saying before, I still think Robo is townie. However, yeah, he doesn't seem to care about his own life. I won't vote him yet, but once again, I could end up giving that a try.