In post 148, Llamarble wrote:Actually yeah scum can fake 120 okay I guess.
120 is the only post agar has made that comes off as even remotely scummy to me. What about it needs to be 'faked' in your mind?
P.S. This agar wagon sucks.
In post 148, Llamarble wrote:Actually yeah scum can fake 120 okay I guess.
In post 86, Shinori wrote:
So MoI is town, chesskid is most likely scum, bella is most likely town, unless there is the possibility of multiple scum being amongst MoI's info. Finally, there is most likely more scum amongst the reasonless, postless players voting me, or quite possibly just amongst the people voting me. @Staeg @Nuwen both who have said nothing except for the words "Vote:" and their "Player of Choice" in any of their posts. Why are these being allowed to fly?
In post 131, AGar wrote:Lol @ ReckDB
Minimum: I think it's pretty clear why my vote is still parked, maybe you should just read the posts I make. It's really really helpful, I promise.
In post 88, Shinori wrote:You voted me because I corrected someone on saying I was defending someone when I wasn't? Also the fact that I said what I thought seraphim did was scummy is the reason you are voting me, so let me get this straight, I shouldn't correct wrongly placed assumptions, and I shouldn't post my thoughts. Got it.
In post 140, Shinori wrote:I DID NOT DEFEND HIM. WHEN DID I DEFEND HIM?
I put a vote on him and then asked if that was something he did or didn't do and asked for clarification on that. Please explain to me how that is me defending him?
Please find the exact line where I thought he was town or defended him. Because I did not. I asked if what he was doing was something he normally did or not.
In post 147, Shinori wrote:No I asked if it was something he did normally, that's completely true. Because I wanted an answer to that question first and felt no need to imply that I figured it was something he tended to do more as scum than town. Where I come from votes with no reason is scummie, and I would normally think that would be something that was normal elsewhere, but apparently that isn't so here.
In post 123, OnceAndForEver wrote:But this early? Really? This happened before post one hundred, No one is stupid enough to have bible level belief in their reads without at least a couple hundred posts. (Given that there have been no slips). I just don't see this happening, I'm sorry.
In post 51, OnceAndForEver wrote:
Can you get more obvious, I mean, honestly, if you were to stand up and yell "I'm scum" do you think that would do it? Choo-Choo Lynch please.
nuwen literally hadn't posted any content at the point where you made that post. why include her?In post 148, Llamarble wrote:Nuwen or Chesskid are the most likely scums on that wagon.
practice, mostly. how town express their frustration usually give off a different vibe from scumfrustration.In post 156, Staeg wrote:Anx, how do you tell the difference between town and scum frustration?
Minimum wrote:BELLA, READ THIS! BELOW HERE!
Since you didn't fully read the post that you voted MagnaofIllusion for, I'm assuming you'll skim this otherwise.
In post 77, Bella wrote:That sounds par for the course. I'll be sure to remember this when you're proven wrong.
(Fwiw, I didn't even read that part of your post on account of noticing the insult you aimed at me. Nice try, though.)
i. Why did you vote for MagnaofIllusion in your first post?
ii. You said before that you voted him without even seeing MoI's claim. Have you read it yet? What do you think?
iii. Are you voting MagnaofIllusion because you don't like him, or do you actually believe that he's scum? The part where you taunt him for being wrong seems to imply you think he's misguided town.
iv. Do you have any thoughts on people in the game whoaren'tMagnaofIllusion?
In post 102, AGar wrote:In post 35, Magister Ludi wrote:erm.... so what? I wasn't asking for their flavor knowledge of their pm, but rather of the arabat book/this game in general. What I want to know, exactly, is who the probable scum team is from an informed flavor standpoint, and who the good guys are.
And you don't think there would be fakeclaims provided?
Also really not big on the 1-of-3 deal with MoI, feels way too gambity on my part considering all 3 are players he'd openly prefer to policy lynch on an account of simply not liking them.
In post 158, 4nxi3ty wrote:practice, mostly. how town express their frustration usually give off a different vibe from scumfrustration.
and shinori's posts have that vibe of town who doesn't understand why a wagon grew so quickly on him and is frustrated cause he thinks he didn't do anything wrong. with scum, I would expect to see more "oh shit they caught me" vibes.
Once wrote:MOI, are you saying that you were in fact gambiting, if so, I hate you forever......
Petapan wrote: Reg - i'm pretty sure MoI retracted his claim, implicitly
RedCoyote wrote:I don't know if that necessarily means we should halt the entire day and choose between the three though.
RedCoyote wrote: :/
Reg wrote:Mina, if you know that Hito dislikes millers is there any particular reason your vote isn't on OAFE right now? Also how confident (A percentage will suffice) are you in there being no miller in this game due to that knowledge?
Llama wrote:
If this isn't a 'the sooner you kill the scums the better for everything' game then it is a weird game indeed.
Nuwen wrote: In the meantime, let me tell you what I see.
In post 164, Nuwen wrote:You've said you don't have a ton of flavor background on this game. I do. The Abarat series is quite dear to me and I've read through it dozens of times. When you mention "three" and "the wisdom of the spire," some very specific denizens of the 25th hour come to mind, and none of them are in a matrix of 1-1-1 or 2-1 or whatever. We're all well-aware that flavor doesn't dictate wincons, but I get the feeling that the things you're thinking don't mean what you think they do.
In post 163, Fate wrote:Oh also this read change has come forth because of my stance on AGar. I'm coming around to him being just badtown and not actually thinking before he votes and it being RVS bullshit, so with that read change makes Shinori by far the scummiest vote on my AGar wagon.
In post 136, MagnaofIllusion wrote:And certainly there’s no possible reason for people to seek out that information …
In post 168, Shinori wrote:Frankly I don't see why your vote is still on magister Ludi and it seems like you are just spouting random nonsense here.
In post 171, AGar wrote:What good does it do to seek out "Hey who would theoretically be scum?" if there's a high chance of mod-provided fakeclaims? Hito isn't a shit-mod, he's not going to put an entire scumteam into position to be lynched because their rolenames were obviously scum. If that were the case, the easiest way to go about this would be mass-name-claiming. This is the problem I've had with his posting thus far - it seems highly pointless to be doing what he's doing rather than paying attention to the game. A vote does not always mean I am 100% set in the ways of him being scum, it never has. Vote is the town's most powerful tool, and if you aren't voting someone for some reason, you're wasting what you have.