Mini 1370: Possessed Pastors in a Paranoid Parish: Who Won?!

[AngryPidgeon]

VOTE: Amrun

Because this is my first game with you and I read a bunch of yours.

[seilkops]

VOTE: Amrun

Because this is my first game with you and I read a bunch of yours.

VOTE: AngryPidgeon


STALKER.


*Disclaimer*
I am RVSing AP

[IceGuy]

*Disclaimer*
I am RVSing AP

I don't like that.

VOTE: seilkops

[Eidolon]

Unvote. Vote: Seilkops.

I agree with Iceguy. Why the need for justification?

[MagnaofIllusion]

VOTE: Seilkops

This wagon is made of win!

[seilkops]

Unvote. Vote: Seilkops.

I agree with Iceguy. Why the need for justification?

So what's happening now, wouldn't happen!
I did that little disclaimer so I wouldn't have people accusing me of "not really RVS'ing"
I know it sounds stupid, but that actually just happened to me in a game, and took up a ton of time and effort to clear myself!
Since I voted for AP right after his post, I could already see the accusations of "You RVS'ed AP right after his post? What are you

real

reasons?"
And the answer will have to be:
I don't have any damn reasons, it's an RVS

[IceGuy]

Why were you so weary of that?

[MagnaofIllusion]

I don't have any damn reasons, it's an RVS

That's the point ... the fact that you had to go out of your way to say it was is suspect.

There were exactly 9 non-Mod posts made before you voted AngryP. Are you honestly suggesting that anyone would have suggested your vote wasn't an RVS style vote when you were the 10th player post after Day opened?

If possible (by which I mean it being complete) link us to the game you say got you flack for RVS voting.

[seilkops]

Why were you so weary of that?

Assuming you mean wary, but regardless the answer is the same.
It's not fun, and it's time consuming and usually does not accomplish a whole lot.

[seilkops]

I don't have any damn reasons, it's an RVS

That's the point ... the fact that you had to go out of your way to say it was is suspect.

There were exactly 9 non-Mod posts made before you voted AngryP. Are you honestly suggesting that anyone would have suggested your vote wasn't an RVS style vote when you were the 10th player post after Day opened?

If possible (by which I mean it being complete) link us to the game you say got you flack for RVS voting.

I've had someone accuse me of it, yeah. I cannot as of now link the game, sorry. Ahh, this sucks.

[Tierce]

UNVOTE: MagnaofIllusion
VOTE: Eidolon

[AngryPidgeon]

UNVOTE: KittyHat (Amrun)
VOTE: IceGuy

Gut scum read is go.

[rapidcanyon]

VOTE: Eidolon She knows why

[MagnaofIllusion]

I've had someone accuse me of it, yeah. I cannot as of now link the game, sorry. Ahh, this sucks.

I find this response not worthy of an unvote.

[Zyrconium]

@IceGuy: "weary" meant to be "wary"? cause if not, your question seems.... self-answering.

UNVOTE: MagnaofIllusion
VOTE: Eidolon

I don't get this post.
At all.
And it's annoying me.

@APigeon(I'm gonna try not to make puns on your name, but it may be a struggle): Why do you feel the word "gut" needs to be made that explicit that soon?
And since I can't see that getting a detailed enough answer:
Do you really think the extra transparency is worth the lower pressure?
Do you really think a single vote with only that reasoning is gonna get a response from either, people who agree, or the person you're attacking?
Was my response the intended response?

[Zyrconium]

Oh yeah, and VOTE: Amrun(Hey, you!) cause I don't want to be seen to be discouraging RVS

[AngryPidgeon]

God I despise rqs.

I said gut because it is a gut read and I want to be clear my vote is no longer random.

No, I didn't expect your response, I want people to wagon iceguy though

[Eidolon]

Unvote. Vote: Seilkops.

I agree with Iceguy. Why the need for justification?

So what's happening now, wouldn't happen!
I did that little disclaimer so I wouldn't have people accusing me of "not really RVS'ing"
I know it sounds stupid, but that actually just happened to me in a game, and took up a ton of time and effort to clear myself!
Since I voted for AP right after his post, I could already see the accusations of "You RVS'ed AP right after his post? What are you

real

reasons?"
And the answer will have to be:
I don't have any damn reasons, it's an RVS

If it was rvs, and you wanted to make a vote but were worried about voting for someone who had just posted, why not just RVS someone else rather than rvs with a justification? seems like an excuse made after the thought.

@ RC: should have voted you for being an atheist

@ AngryPidgeon: why should people wagon

your

gut read? Which post of his gave you this gut feeling?

[AngryPidgeon]

@ AngryPidgeon:

why should people wagon your gut read?

Which post of his gave you this gut feeling?

That first question is just pointless. Like. I really don't know if you're scum and trying to look like you are generating discussion or if you really are that incapable of asking relevant questions, but I'm leaning scum on you.

Its a gut read. By definition, I trust my gut read. I guess I could do a shameless self plug and talk about how I carried the town in Space Mafia, if you'd really like me to explain why other people should sheep me.

And he made all of two posts between my RVS and my vote for him. Which do YOU think made me get the read? Hint: both. Super bonus question: why does it matter to you? Did you have a reason for asking that?

UNVOTE: Iceguy
VOTE: Eidolon

Eidolon wagon, gogogogo.

[Eidolon]

You said you wanted people to wagon iceguy but your only reason is your gut. Everyone has gut reads so i see no reason to wagon on yours in particular. For instance, my gut is on zyrconium (possibly for the subtle buddying due to tierces vote.) I was trying to decipher if there was some sort of reasoning behind the gut, such as something particular that he said that seemed off to you, or if you just pulled it out of your ass expecting people to blindly follow you.

[Tierce]

I don't get this post.
At all.
And it's annoying me.

Unnecessary jumping on seilkops. There are a few people in this game that I see as likely D1 lynches, and seilkops is one of them. The frustrated way he reacted to three people voting him feels like town who is tired of defending himself from this kind of thing, even though the RVS disclaimer was silly.

I expected IceGuy's vote due to what I know from his play. MoI was trying to figure out why seilkops would do something like that as town/scum. Eidolon is the wildcard here.

Plus, why would you lynch an adorable baby seal?

[Hiraki]

I can vouch for seik's paranoia.

I won't say anymore though because it's ongoing.

and I want to be clear my vote is no longer random.

your gut has no reasoning

so it's really just a smudge off random

why does it matter to you? Did you have a reason for asking that?

perhaps he wanted to see where you were coming from and not think you were throwing random darts in order to try and find a target

or if you just pulled it out of your ass expecting people to blindly follow you.

see

this person thinks

unlike you

but good job on jumping on one super small(which now you're trying to make to be a huge point of his post--which it wasn't) point

here's a question for you angry:

why did that comment matter enough for a vote? what did he do that was scummy there?

[Eidolon]

Tierce, you admit that Seilkop's RVS disclaimer was silly, and then say my vote was unnecessary. Why?

The justification you gave didn't happen until after i placed my vote. (i'd have no idea whether he was a likely lynch target or not)

I can see why you say his frustration seems townish but i'd still like to get a response from him in regards to my question because really, the line of reasoning he used in order to justify his action doesn't compute.

[Amrun]

Eidolon, does silly = scum?

[Tierce]

Silly != scum. Town doesn't look for behaviors, it looks for motivations.


PEdit: ...hello.