#395 doesn't count - Stefan's choose wasn't bolded. Not trying to be a dick, but etc.
(Also the red and green votecounts look cool together, and being cool is important. That is all!)
In post 398, StefanB wrote:That not but the defence of "I am so scummy, I can't be scum" is still worst.
So beeing unhelpful und checky is now a towntell?
Shadow try another explanation?
In post 378, Regfan wrote:CES, I don't find anything in your posts even slightly town, convince me I'm wrong?
In post 393, Salamence20 wrote:And again, the point is, that CES and I haven't even played a full game together, just Lylo, so I don't think that is enough for CES to get suspicious.
Am I wrong?
In post 394, hasdgfas wrote:The meta argument does absolutely nothing for me without you elaborating. I could say "My meta on people posting the way Edd does makes me think he's scum" and it means absolutely nothing. I can't give weight to you saying that his meta resembles his town play because of that.
In post 403, StefanB wrote:Preview: I am trying to deal with you, Shadow. But I am afraid that isn't what you wanted.
So your defence is you are usless because it is so early in the game, so you have to be usless? When do you start to play?
In post 397, Shadow1psc wrote:Because scum deliberately act scummy
In post 404, Minimum wrote:In post 394, hasdgfas wrote:The meta argument does absolutely nothing for me without you elaborating. I could say "My meta on people posting the way Edd does makes me think he's scum" and it means absolutely nothing. I can't give weight to you saying that his meta resembles his town play because of that.
You should learn to sheep. It's a very useful skill.
In post 410, Tyene Sand wrote:Very much disagree with Shadow1psc that "too little has happened" on 17 pages that are very non-spammy, and not entirely sure why he's pushing that notion.
In post 412, Pandora wrote:It's all well and good to say that but if some of us didn't take it seriously the game would never progress to the point where people can get reads and have 'for serious' cases. (as far as I'm concerned it's been long enough, a few days and 17 pages should be more then enough to find scum)
Faraday this is your fault.In post 411, Shadow1psc wrote:Call me jaded maybe
In post 414, Tyene Sand wrote:Faraday this is your fault.In post 411, Shadow1psc wrote:Call me jaded maybe
@Shadow1psc:
Why are you arguing for the defusing of discussion and wagons in general?
Gun to the head, snap decision: who would you vig if you were chosen?
I can point you to Weather Mafia II where I got BBmolla-scum lynched D1 with decent pieces of evidence (why do you care if the evidence is 'right' when lynching scum, anyway? People make too much noise out of cases, and there's little point in giving your scumread ammunition against you). It happens, and it's not that rare.
There are several players who are focusing quite a bit on townreads over scumreads. See Regfan. See myself. You're making general arguments instead of pointing concrete fingers and it's quite slippery. Who is doing this messy D1 thing that you so abhor?
In post 417, Tyene Sand wrote:You should stop assuming stupid = scum, btw. The way your Salamence read progressed was a clear sign of that. (And yet, it was a clear BBtown, so that was nice.)
In post 361, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
Lyanna wrote: Good! ^^^ And for anyone wondering a continued reason for why I'm getting a town read on Edd. Good luck moving into college Arthur!!!
Why don’t you explain how what you quoted in Post 333 should explain your Town-read on Dol Edd because I don’t see much in the way of alignment relevant information in the quoted post.
In post 386, Tyene Sand wrote:Individual scumhunting from Arthur/Alek. They're likely wrong in their top scumspects, but the way their reads differ don't really speak of someone who's bothering to check with their buddy to make sure they don't mess up their reads or accidentally write themselves into a corner. I'd like them to patch it up, as with Pandora, but initially? Alek came in and threw down reads with major disregard for what Arthur had already said. Yes, this is a towntell from them.In post 385, Plessiezarus wrote:In post 374, Tyene Sand wrote:Aaand the major hydra dissonance just showed that Edd is (are?) town (again).
Can't say I agree with this. The hydra dissonance displayed by Pandora earlier seemed very natural; that's a town-tell, sure. But the Alek/Arthur dissonance? Meh.
In post 356, StefanB wrote:
Tammy, Tierce: Roleplaying is okay, your fighting against each other, your jabs and all, do they have a purpose, or are they just a nice reminder that you dislike each other? If they are pointless can they stopp, they become a distrection I think.
In post 360, SnowStorm wrote:In post 333, Lyanna Stark wrote:
SnowStorm it must suck to come to MS and have your first role pm be scum. So, Benmage looks town to you does he? *glances up at vote count* Can you explain why you're still voting him then?
Is everyone pretty much null to you SnowStorm? Not one person you want to vote for and pressbesides the one you just called town? None?
Yup, I think he's town. Yup, my vote stayed on him. Obviously, when I called him town, that vote lost it's power, so it was basically the same as unvoting. But, unvoting is boring, since it doesn't allow for this kind of situation...
I'm kind of surprised that you, of all people, picked on this. You've seen me do it before, more than once, this is something I usually do when I have no suspects. Also, you usually pay attention to this kind of stuff and I never expected this reaction from you.