Open 432: Robo's PYP (Game Over)

[Sawyer]

You must care little. That offense was what most of this whole back and forth was about.

[Shamrock]

UNVOTE: Purrfect Panda
VOTE: Sawyer

[Brandi]

was that even english

[Brandi]

EBWOP
^ was @sawyer

[Brandi]

Oh I understand what he was trying to say now.

Sawyer, I care enough for the basis of scum-hunting, but I don't care to convince you of anything- because I don't think you are town and I don't think you are worth the effort.
If someone I think is town asks me reasonable questions or poses such concerns I shall respond to them in kind.

My back in forth with you serves the purpose to further confirm or deny my suspicions of you. I have no issue with explaining my thought process at this point because I've already gotten the answers I need and am happy with my vote.

[DeasVail]

UNVOTE: Purrfect Panda
VOTE: Sawyer

What changed your mind?

[absta101]

@Starbuck

&

@DV

What do you think of this?

Sawyer, I care enough for the basis of scum-hunting, but I don't care to convince you of anything- because I don't think you are town and I don't think you are worth the effort.

----

@Sawyer

My alternate theory about you was wrong therefore you're back to being an option for me.
Btw, I still want an answer to why you were okay with killing Panda without a claim.
----

@Everyone

- If anything, Brandi looks worse coming out of that exchange.
I'm very interested in what Starbuck will say.

[Brandi]

Absta you have a very weird view as to what constitutes looking "bad" or "good";

[DeasVail]

I think Brandi's posting could be considered scummy, but I think she's town at the moment.

[Purrfect Panda]

umm Absta? Could you explain that post a tad I am kinda lost with it?

I am of course not 100% sure and still have a small bit of suspicion that I would have on someone who is not conf town, but I feel pretty good about Brandi being in our town pile.

I am not getting the push on DV though? Could someone explain the case you have on him? I kinda see him as more town.

Sawyer could you explain yourself a tad there? You changed your vote without any reasons or case listed.

[absta101]

@Brandi

IMO everyone that was on the Nat wagon -was- town. Not confirmed, no, but certainly town-ish.

This doesn't seem like it's coming from town. There's also post #691 which seems forced.
Considering how awkward your reaction to the JK claim was and how you initially voted Nat with no apparent reason makes you a suspect.
The Nat lynch was happening, your effort to try to rule out bussing is terrible and suspicious.

Correct me if i'm wrong.
- You gave Nat a VI read for tunnelling you.
- BK calls Nat scum for tunnelling.
- You sheep BK, a JK claim that's "unbelievable", in lynching Nat for tunnelling.
----

@Panda

Both you and Brandi mentioned a JK before one claimed. Of course you have a "town read" on her.

[Brandi]

Absta you literally are bringing up something I already responded to.
Like literally every issue you've had with me I've explained and you just blatantly ignored it.

[DeasVail]

His expectation that an explanation would make my scumread disappear is maybe a slight towntell though.

Absta you literally are bringing up something I already responded to.
Like literally every issue you've had with me I've explained and you just blatantly ignored it.

[Brandi]

I will admit that I have not played enough mafia to know for sure what is VI or what is scum.
I had never had an instance of scum tunneling hard on me before this one because I never play this game. I didn't think scum would be that dumb/bad to just sit on my slot the whole game.
Turns out I was wrong. So yes I had a VI read on her.

No- I didn't lynch Nat for tunneling.
Her posts during the time of BK's claim are what made me suspect her.


And yes a JK is unbelievable- because scum wouldn't pick that unless scum is stupid- which apparently- they are.


But I'm sure that you are going to ignore this post and bring up your same "issues" again later despite me explaining it several times.
Stop making me question my town read on you absta- there are too many scummy people in this game as it is.

and FTR I have not had a town read on Panda all game.

But if you are scum then my read on Panda would change.

[Brandi]

EBWOP: Ninja'd by Deas


@Deas: What is wrong with your faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaace?

[DeasVail]

@Deas: What is wrong with your faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaace?

Um.. I don't know?

[Brandi]

I meant the smiley, I don't understand the point of your post. I might just be dumb in not understanding it because of lack of sleep though

[DeasVail]

You did something kind of similar to what I earlier said I found townish.

I found it interesting.

[Shamrock]

UNVOTE: Purrfect Panda
VOTE: Sawyer

What changed your mind?

Nothing, I agreed with the Sawyer arguments being made at the end of D1, I just figured that since nobody was willing to join me on Panda I might as well do something more useful with my vote.

Want to take another look at absta given Slandaar's adamance on his being scum... will do that later.

[Robocopter87]

__________

:

|

Vote Count

|

:

• xRECKONERx [0]
  
• Starbuck [0]
  
• Shamrock [0]
  
• DeasVail [1] Sawyer
  
• absta101 [0]
  
• Brandi [0]
  
• BK201 [0]
  
• Purrfect Panda [0]
  
• Code_X [0]
  
• Sawyer [3] DeasVail, Brandi, Shamrock

:

|

Not Voting

|

:

• xRECKONERx, Starbuck, absta101, BK201, Purrfect Panda, Code_X,

:

|

Amount to Lynch

|

:

• With 10 Alive it is 6 to Lynch.

:

|

Deadline

|

:

• September 19^th, EST.

__________

[Robocopter87]

BK201 has been prodded.

[xRECKONERx]

I'm in way too many goddamned games right now, seriously. I made a slight error in judgment when I signed up for so many at once.

I guess I don't really have any strong opinions one way or another, so I can just

vote: Sawyer

.

[absta101]

I'm in way too many goddamned games right now, seriously. I made a slight error in judgment when I signed up for so many at once.

I guess I don't really have any strong opinions one way or another, so I can just

vote: Sawyer

.

Both you and Shamrock are looking great. /sarcasm
----

@Brandi

- Your explanation is backed up with a pathetic excuse.
- You threaten to change your town read on me.
Keep going. You're doing great at convincing me you're town.

Please point me to where you explained yourself.

[Robocopter87]

Prodding Code_X and Starbuck will need a prod in a couple hours.

[BK201]

My suspicion is based on your lack of attempt to better read the other lynch candidates and/or try to have some say in who gets lynched. Apart from your vote, you didn't seem to care too much about who was lynched. My theory is fear of any attempt to get Brandi lynched looking like an attempt to save Nat.

My feelings toward Brandi, Nat and Panda should've been obvious since they hardly changed through the day. I wanted Panda vigged and I didn't think Nat should've been lynched at all. I still think her wagon picked up speed way to fast and out of nowhere and I said as much yesterday. That should've made it clear I didn't support the Nat wagon at all. BK says she could be scum tunneling to avoid scum hunting and she goes from no votes all the way to L-1 within 3 pages.

That one reason isn't good enough for me.

I'm baffled as to how her wagon took off as fast as it did. Absta only voted her because BK said he was confident in his read, though absta ultimately realized that wasn't a good reason to vote her and unvoted. Even you were unconvinced of Nat-scum, but ended up putting her at L-1 with no indication that you had been swayed into thinking she was scum (to avoid suspicion, me thinks).

Did you miss Slaandar's reason? Which I'm sure netted a vote or two.

She is scum because of the way she hopped on BK after saying literally nothing about him all game.

Tunnel Tunnel Tunnel while not trying to convince people to lynch your tunnel target + compromise vote on someone you have shown no interest in/not posted one opinion on = scum