Micro 21: Bird 7P GAME OVER

saulres · Post Post #125 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2012 6:04 am

In post 120, Zachrulez wrote:Don't really like iso 61 looking back where he says he's convinced Carbon is town but is willing to lynch him nontheless. Seems like trying to have it both ways.

I thought I heard something like that before.

In post 62, zabriel wrote:Emp, if you think he's town, the wisest thing, I should think would be to place your vote on somebody you feel we'll hit scum on and attempt to avoid LyLo in the first place. This seems like an attempt to push the lynch forward but still being able to throw your hands up and say you thought it was best for the town.

Lots of duplicate ideas in this game. Not sure what to make of that.

saulres · Post Post #126 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2012 6:33 am

@Mod: Requesting prod of FuDuzn

(over 48 hours since last post here)

Cobblerfone · Post Post #127 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2012 7:35 am

FuDuzn has been prodded.

With 5 alive, it takes 3 to lynch

Votecount 2.3

Empking
FuDuzn
Zachrulez
scooby
Saulres

Not Voting -5- Empking, FuDuzn, Zachrulez, scooby, Saulres

Day Two Deadline(expired on 2012-09-20 09:55:00)

saulres · Post Post #128 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2012 7:41 am

Empking, when you came to the conclusion that I was scum, you did it based on:

In post 115, Empking wrote:Claim delaying.

Please explain how I delayed claiming.

Empking · Post Post #129 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2012 7:44 am

In post 128, saulres wrote:Empking, when you came to the conclusion that I was scum, you did it based on:

In post 115, Empking wrote:Claim delaying.

Please explain how I delayed claiming.

It took you over 24 hours. Presuming you come on the site at least once a day then you didn't claim ASAP AKA Claim delaying.

FuDuzn · Post Post #130 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2012 7:46 am

Oops sorry, busy weekend of volleyball, drinking, and football. Thought I had posted more recent then that, but I guess time flies. Anywho....

Saul, why is me agreeing with your viewpoint about mass claiming considered rehashing ideas? IIRC, someone had posted asking what everyones thoughts where about claiming or not claiming, so I gave my two cents. And the second post of mine you quoted was just after empking was asking me to state how can win without outing the cop, so I answered his question(albeit did realize after the fact I misunderstood his question a bit).

saulres · Post Post #131 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2012 7:48 am

In post 129, Empking wrote:Presuming you come on the site at least once a day

Reasonable presumption, but (despite appearances) not also accurate.

But okay, let's say I was delaying. What scum motivation do you think I would have had for doing so?

pedit: It's not agreeing, it's taking what I said and essentially repeating it. Much easier to quote me, or link to it, rather than reword it.

Empking · Post Post #132 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2012 7:52 am

In post 131, saulres wrote:But okay, let's say I was delaying. What scum motivation do you think I would have had for doing so?

"Motive" is the wrong way of looking at it. Scum have a choice between what role to claim, making a descision takes time and scum may not have fully made up their mind when asked to claim, they then take an extra day to think about it to make up their mind.

saulres · Post Post #133 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2012 9:27 am

Given that claiming and talking about claiming is all we've done today, do you really think scum would have needed any more time to think about it?

scooby · Post Post #134 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2012 1:43 pm

Vote: Empking

willing to go 1-1 on this bitch

Empking · Post Post #135 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2012 1:51 pm

In post 133, saulres wrote:Given that claiming and talking about claiming is all we've done today, do you really think scum would have needed any more time to think about it?

When ever you have a choice you always make a better choice as you have longer to think about it.

saulres · Post Post #136 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2012 3:50 pm

In post 134, scooby wrote:willing to go 1-1

What does that mean?

Empking · Post Post #137 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2012 4:04 pm

In post 136, saulres wrote:
In post 134, scooby wrote:willing to go 1-1

What does that mean?

When I flip town, he'll celebrate his victory. (he's being disingenuous and using languange that means "Lynch X, if they town lynch me next".)

scooby · Post Post #138 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2012 4:41 pm

In post 136, saulres wrote:
In post 134, scooby wrote:willing to go 1-1

What does that mean?

This means that Im fucking sure Empking is scum here.

Since he attacked me day 1 for weak reasons (I know I am town, so one of the three people that attacked me day 1 must be scum and Emp is the only one alive now) and now that he attacks you for "claim delaying".

CLAIM.DELAYING.

Seriously.

saulres · Post Post #139 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2012 5:02 pm

In post 137, Empking wrote:When I flip town, he'll celebrate his victory. (he's being disingenuous and using languange that means "Lynch X, if they town lynch me next".)

That's what I thought he meant, but it didn't make any sense given we're in LyLo, so if he's wrong, we lose ("We" being town, which doesn't necessarily include you.)

I'm guessing that you think he's town, though, because you're not voting him back?

Empking · Post Post #140 (ISO) » Tue Sep 11, 2012 1:37 am

In post 139, saulres wrote:
In post 137, Empking wrote:When I flip town, he'll celebrate his victory. (he's being disingenuous and using languange that means "Lynch X, if they town lynch me next".)

That's what I thought he meant, but it didn't make any sense given we're in LyLo, so if he's wrong, we lose ("We" being town, which doesn't necessarily include you.)

I'm guessing that you think he's town, though, because you're not voting him back?

No I think he's scum; and of course with his being scum scum can't quick hammer me. He's just not my top read and I'm not going to make a descision under pressure.

Zachrulez · Post Post #141 (ISO) » Tue Sep 11, 2012 8:18 am

Leaning toward an empking vote but re-reading to make sure I haven't missed anything.

saulres · Post Post #142 (ISO) » Tue Sep 11, 2012 11:04 am

It's six pages, just wondering how long it's going to take you to re-read.

FuDuzn · Post Post #143 (ISO) » Tue Sep 11, 2012 3:18 pm

In post 141, Zachrulez wrote:Leaning toward an empking vote but re-reading to make sure I haven't missed anything.

Saul already said it(my bad, repeating people again), but this hasn't exactly been a tough read of a game. Don't be so wishy washy, not sure I am in love with Zach tbh. I really hope you come back with something concrete on your next post.

But I am really not loving scooby, if we are going to start voting then I much prefer him over empking. I am starting to think a scooby/zach scum team.
VOTE: scooby

scooby · Post Post #144 (ISO) » Tue Sep 11, 2012 3:22 pm

well, Im town

so if Fudzn is town, then its gg

scooby · Post Post #145 (ISO) » Tue Sep 11, 2012 3:24 pm

ok, so all players have posted after my vote

this likely means that one of me and empking is scum, so yeah, I was right

Empking · Post Post #146 (ISO) » Tue Sep 11, 2012 3:49 pm

In post 143, FuDuzn wrote:But I am really not loving scooby, if we are going to start voting then I much prefer him over empking. I am starting to think a scooby/zach scum team.

Ha, same. I was planning on voting Zach but I think in the current circumstance it would be better to

Vote: Scooby

scooby · Post Post #147 (ISO) » Tue Sep 11, 2012 4:33 pm

Fudzn, if you are town, unvote now because yeah we are loke about to lose

Cobblerfone · Post Post #148 (ISO) » Tue Sep 11, 2012 5:56 pm

With 5 alive, it takes 3 to lynch

Votecount 2.4

Empking -1- scooby
FuDuzn
Zachrulez

scooby -2- FuDuzn, Empking

Saulres

Not Voting -5- Zachrulez, Saulres

Day Two Deadline(expired on 2012-09-20 09:55:00)

Zachrulez · Post Post #149 (ISO) » Wed Sep 12, 2012 1:48 am

PRIORITY OVERRIDE: INCINERATE! EXTERMINATE!

Vote: scooby