Whose Tit is Tat? (Mirco 24) : Game Over

N · Post Post #25 (ISO) » Fri Sep 14, 2012 6:15 pm

In post 23, Maestro wrote:Fancy-Pants...N...numberQ...periodNQ...?!?

A Game of
Thrones
Alts

Wait, whose alt am I?

In post 24, Guy_Named_Riggs wrote:
In post 22, periodNQ wrote:Am I one of the people who have not confirmed?

~Yes. And also one replaced. Sorry for the inconvience~

Awkward.

Maestro · Post Post #26 (ISO) » Fri Sep 14, 2012 6:16 pm

It was a joke: the little trifecta of you, numberQ, and periodNQ just includes some interesting name coincidences.
Plus people were calling Fancy-Pants an alt so.

pieceofpecanpie · Post Post #27 (ISO) » Fri Sep 14, 2012 6:31 pm

What? Names are confusing enough to try and learn without mixing them all up.

VOTE: Maestro

Maestro · Post Post #28 (ISO) » Fri Sep 14, 2012 6:44 pm

Haha how was I mixing them up? I was observing a fact!

frog · Post Post #29 (ISO) » Fri Sep 14, 2012 8:09 pm

In post 13, Maestro wrote:frog! I miss 1228!

Also Fancy-Pants, voting N is my line. Don't steal it.

N · Post Post #30 (ISO) » Fri Sep 14, 2012 8:11 pm

It's okay; there's plenty of me to go around.

Maestro · Post Post #31 (ISO) » Fri Sep 14, 2012 8:12 pm

^ Ew.

Fancy-Pants · Post Post #32 (ISO) » Fri Sep 14, 2012 11:00 pm

In post 29, frog wrote:

Also Fancy-Pants, voting N is my line. Don't steal it.[/quote]

Are you saying that you don't want other people to vote for N?

frog · Post Post #33 (ISO) » Fri Sep 14, 2012 11:54 pm

What I was saying was, in fact, a half and half mixture of accusing you of early bandwagonning and a joke about the theme of this game.

N · Post Post #34 (ISO) » Sat Sep 15, 2012 12:02 am

There are wagons on Mestro and FancyPants too. What do you think of them?

frog · Post Post #35 (ISO) » Sat Sep 15, 2012 12:45 am

Not much, to be honest. NumberQ's vote is pure RVS. Pieceofpecan's vote looks pro-town to me. Fancy-Pants' brushes me up the wrong way.

N · Post Post #36 (ISO) » Sat Sep 15, 2012 12:49 am

Wait, are you actually serious about not liking someone voting the same as you?

frog · Post Post #37 (ISO) » Sat Sep 15, 2012 1:45 am

In post 36, N wrote:Wait, are you actually serious about not liking someone voting the same as you?

No, of course not, I'm fine with others voting the same person as me. But as I said, I think his vote post was a bit suspect.

N · Post Post #38 (ISO) » Sat Sep 15, 2012 2:17 am

FancyPants's vote on me seems like a legitimate RV to me. I don't see anything opportunistic about it any more than numberQ's vote on fancypants or peacanpie's vote on Maestro.

VOTE: ShadedMelee
Wakey wakey!

frog · Post Post #39 (ISO) » Sat Sep 15, 2012 2:50 am

In post 38, N wrote:FancyPants's vote on me seems like a legitimate RV to me. I don't see anything opportunistic about it any more than numberQ's vote on fancypants or peacanpie's vote on Maestro.

VOTE: ShadedMelee
Wakey wakey!

Do you think numberQ's vote on fancy-pants was opportunistic? How about Pieceofpecanpie's vote on Maestro? If yes/no, why?

Maestro · Post Post #40 (ISO) » Sat Sep 15, 2012 3:13 am

I feel like I just read a game with ShadedMelee in it. Weird.

@frog: I don't know if that's what he's inferring exactly...but I'll let him clarify because I'm not N.

Also @periodNQ: why you post and no RV?

Fancy-Pants · Post Post #41 (ISO) » Sat Sep 15, 2012 3:15 am

How do you distinguish pro-town/suspect votes from RVS ones this early in the game? I don't think anyone's vote has been particularly suspicious. Calling votes "opportunistic votes" this early in the game also seems a bit ambitious to me. At the same time, this is a small game, and it only takes 5 to lynch. I don't think 2 votes on someone in RVS is any cause for concern though.

frog · Post Post #42 (ISO) » Sat Sep 15, 2012 3:16 am

In post 40, Maestro wrote:
I feel like I just read a game with ShadedMelee in it. Weird.

@frog: I don't know if that's what he's inferring exactly...but I'll let him clarify because I'm not N.
Also @periodNQ: why you post and no RV?

Possibly because he's not in the game?

P-edit: will respond to fancy-pants later, have to go for now.

Maestro · Post Post #43 (ISO) » Sat Sep 15, 2012 3:20 am

In post 42, frog wrote:Possibly because he's not in the game?

Holy- I knew there was something up with the playerlist. Why did he post in-thread if he was replaced...?

Also, @F-P: was that directed at me? Because it was N calling them opportunistic.

Maestro · Post Post #44 (ISO) » Sat Sep 15, 2012 3:20 am

In post 42, frog wrote:Possibly because he's not in the game?

Holy- I knew there was something up with the playerlist. Why did he post in-thread if he was replaced...?

Also, @F-P: was that directed at me? Because it was N calling them opportunistic.

Maestro · Post Post #45 (ISO) » Sat Sep 15, 2012 3:21 am

Ack, sorry GNR.

Delete DP, por favor?

Tochica · Post Post #46 (ISO) » Sat Sep 15, 2012 3:31 am

@Maestro I am periodNQ's replacement I believe. I think he just wasn't aware he was replaced and came to confirm or something.

As for the ongoing discussion, there isn't anything particular in the votes cast so far that pinged me in any way. I think its a bit strange Fancy didn't comment on Number's vote though.

Frog if you find Fancy a bit suspicious why not throw your vote that way?

Maestro · Post Post #47 (ISO) » Sat Sep 15, 2012 3:41 am

In post 46, Tochica wrote:@Maestro I am periodNQ's replacement I believe. I think he just wasn't aware he was replaced and came to confirm or something.

Yeah I understood that much right after I said something. Aw well...

Yeah we're still in RVS. Who here likes RQ's?

Fancy-Pants · Post Post #48 (ISO) » Sat Sep 15, 2012 3:46 am

Nobody really brought up opportunistic as such. N was implying that the votes weren't opportunistic. Frog then asked whether he thought other votes were. I guess my statement about opportunistic votes was said to everyone in general, but I picked it up from Frog.

@Tochica: I don't really feel it's necessary to comment on it. I'm not an alt, and judging from the "obviously" in his post, he believes me or doesn't care either way. Pretty standard RVS to me.

N · Post Post #49 (ISO) » Sat Sep 15, 2012 4:01 am

In post 39, frog wrote:Do you think numberQ's vote on fancy-pants was opportunistic? How about Pieceofpecanpie's vote on Maestro? If yes/no, why?

Nope, because they are RVS. What I was saying (I think fancy-pants understood me) was that I don't think any of them are opportunistic.

In post 47, Maestro wrote:Who here likes RQ's?

No one does. Ever. We don't need to do that shit; we're pretty much out of RVS now (although there's no serious votes yet) and there's actual discussion going on.