NY 159: RUST game over

[PeregrineV]

Taz, I see what your saying, and you're saying it better than you think.

However, millers don't live to lylo even if they are real. Still going to base it more off play until more info says to do otherwise.

[drmyshotgun]

Tazaro is scum.

[drmyshotgun]

With Malpa of course.

[scooby]

Antiprod because.

[drmyshotgun]

At first I thought Tazaro was just VI but turns out, he's part of scumteam.

[drmyshotgun]

I shall elaborate if needed, but its quite obvious.

[AngryPidgeon]

^ Yes please.

[drmyshotgun]

Yes as in its obvious right?

[drmyshotgun]

In fact, IF malpascp is scum, the only attempted benefit of his miller claim that is see is -> neutralizing the negative stigma of BLOODCOVENANT's claim, which makes sense if malpascp wants to protect a scum buddy in BloodCovenant.

And if this IS a reason for scum malpascp to rationalize a claim of miller, I don't think it's terribly likely.

@drmyshotty, If we lynch one of them first, though, it should be malpascp, for the information that malpascp's flip would give to incriminate BC, in my view.

I mean information that a malpascp scum flip would give. If malpascp is scum, BC should get heat, in my view, but if BC flips scum, that doesn't tell us anything about malpascp.

Finally someone got it. Thanks Taz.

This needs like way more votes

Been kinda distracted, so I don't get it.

It's elementary, my dear AngryPidgey

[AngryPidgeon]

You think he is scum with Malp for defending Malp's miller claim? And by defending I mean I dunno. They are barely making sense to me.

Tazaro's point seems to be that Scum would not CC a town miller in this situation, but would potentially CC a scum buddy. So a scum flip from Malp means that BC is scum?

Actually it does kind of sound like he is saying that BC is scum regardless of what Malp flips and is then pushing Malp.

[Rob14]

Plus he's yet to acknowledge my point that mal didn't see the first miller claim before claiming, because he knows his theory doesn't stand up to that.

[roflcopter]

y'all can stop spamming pages every day now please and thank you i'd like to be able to keep up with this game

[Darthe]

This needs like way more votes

Remind me again what was pingy in there? Perhaps I am mistaken but all of your plays at me so far have essentially been a reply to my asking about your scummy arse slip earlier. Still not seein' what you're trying to get at here.

Btw, weaksauce sheep vote from BC (etc) is why he can't sell his credibility for a nickle to his own family.

[Rob14]

This needs like way more votes

Remind me again what was pingy in there? Perhaps I am mistaken but all of your plays at me so far have essentially been a reply to my asking about your scummy arse slip earlier. Still not seein' what you're trying to get at here.

Btw, weaksauce sheep vote from BC (etc) is why he can't sell his credibility for a nickle to his own family.

It wasn't a slip. It was undeniably a typo. The fact that you jumped on it was scummy. I mean seriously - look at what you're saying. You're trying to claim that someone made a scumslip by literally typing out that they were scum. Isn't is 10000000000 times more likely that he forgot a word?

If you're arguing that he subconsciously forgot the word because he's scum, well, I don't think I need to argue against that. The silliness stands for itself.

[Rob14]

EBWOP: is --> it in my rhetorical question

Oh no! I made a typo! Must be scum!

[Cheery Dog]

I'm not seeing why Darthe needs more votes, calling someone out for flailing means they are scummy how?

[Rob14]

I'm not seeing why Darthe needs more votes, calling someone out for flailing means they are scummy how?

It's not so much the flailing as it was the post before it. He tried to claim AP admitted to being scum when it was a clear typo.

I think it's suspect, but there are better places to put a vote today. DemonCore needs more votes for sure. Look at his ISO and tell me that's not ObvScum.

[Cheery Dog]

I've fairly sure I did the exact same thing when I voted malp, although malp never fixed what he had said, so I'm just wondering, does that also make me suspect?

[4nxi3ty]

AngryPidgeon

(2) - zabriel, curiouskarmadog

zabriel

(3)

- ProHawk, roflcopter, Dathe

Rob13

(1) - PeregrineV

DemonCore

(1) - Rob13

malpascp

(2) - Cheery Dog, drmyshotgun

Darthe

(2) - AngryPidgeon, BloodCovenant

Not Voting

(6) - malpascp, Josh Lyman, PMysterious, scooby, Tazaro, DemonCore

With 17 alive it takes 9 to lynch.
Deadline: (expired on 2012-10-23 15:08:03)

[Tazaro]

Plus he's yet to acknowledge my point that mal didn't see the first miller claim before claiming, because he knows his theory doesn't stand up to that.

How the hell do you get TWO miller claims RIGHT OFF THE BAT without the second person seeing the first one?

[Cheery Dog]

Read the second miller claim again. If he had read the first miller claim before posting, wouldn't there be an acknowledgement to it in the post?
Looks to me like he just opened to a reply box to say he existed.

Spoiler: if you're too lazy to find it yourself

Hi there. Hungover.
Claim: miller.
will read later today, and I guess RVS is already over.

[Tazaro]

Either malpascp saw BC's claim or two people independently decided to claim miller. How would two people independently claim miller in the same game and there not actually likely be two millers?

[Cheery Dog]

The same chance as a game without a miller where a scum claims miller.

[Rob14]

I've fairly sure I did the exact same thing when I voted malp, although malp never fixed what he had said, so I'm just wondering, does that also make me suspect?

Can you quote the posts? If you did, I don't see it from your ISO.

[Tazaro]

I suppose the coincidence does make malpascp more likely to be a scum who is fakeclaiming miller after BloodCovenant's claim.