In post 3021, Tyene Sand wrote:Stop getting in the way of my pretty VC work, scum.
Why should I? It's not like I need your permission to post. Besides, you seem to get in your own way just fine without any help from me.
23 posts left.
In post 3021, Tyene Sand wrote:Stop getting in the way of my pretty VC work, scum.
Even when you're not rping you still often write non-generic phrases, thats what I meant by flavorful phrases. The point isn't that using non-generic phrases is an alignment tell, pretty sure you would do that as either alignment; the point is in a setup with a traitor, using the term 'traitorous' would be a scumtell for some people. I don't think it is in your case.Tyene wrote:4nxi3ty -I had a townread on mockingjaye. 4nxi3ty, while we are at it, the thing is... I did not RP in either Abarat (where I was scum and didn't know the flavor) or in hiplop's Mini Normal. So my question is how do you gather that I enjoy making flavorful posts and that this is a townish/null-at- most trait from me?
I agree with Zdenek here, the bolded part has no logical connection to the previous statements, and is an obvious message to those who are looking for traitors, especially since this is his first post.In post 39, Feysal wrote:Everything we say will influence the choice made by whoever we eventually send, and right or wrong,what we say will be used to determine where our own loyalties lie.
I bolded two parts, not one, since "to be alone" describes Traitor position exactly (ie adds a second meaning to the otherwise normal phrase), and the second part makes sure that anybody with Traitor role will catch it, and reread the post.In post 93, Tyene Sand wrote:Whatissuspect about this multiball thing (by all means, pappums--go read a few Feysal posts elsewhere) is the offhanded way Feysal addressed it, as anyone who has read or played with him will realize. Feysal has a tendency to wax prose over every single point that is not an established fact, and here there was an 'assumption' that he simply took and ran with without developing it. It feels awkward, out of place--as if it is already fact for him because he knows his scumteam is too small to be alone.
And if, by chance, he is not atraitorous servantof the enemy, this is most certainly a man I trust with killing that bastard on the Wall.
In post 3045, kortul wrote:And i totally don't see Aegons killing a mason, with Shadow promising to torture bvoigt. Even if Shadow was telling a lie, imagine them killing a mason, and Shadow asking in the morning "so, bvoigt, whom did you shoot?".
Well, knowing your role, we can rely only on answers that have some links behind.In post 3020, Feysal wrote:Or has it not occured to you to just, you know, ask? I may even answer if I deem it harmless, or if I believe it to be more useful in hunting the other team.
For example, this one, can you give a link to this game?In post 3020, Feysal wrote:I have not seen him use traitors, but there is a game we both played in relevant to what you want to know.
Regfan, after i saw Feysal "flip" i had paranoid thoughts: what if Aegons are not split, just also have a traitor, and BBmola is either looking for him, or telling the faction "recruit me"? But i doubt scum would be so openly looking for each other. And Starbuck is more likely Aegon anyway.In post 3027, Regfan wrote:Mulled this game over in my head on the way home today (And finally home so should be able to get back to full activity tonight in 4-5 hours) and I don't think Molla fits as scum at all. Him lying about getting the message during the day to avoid being night-killed makes sense regardless of his alignment however the way that he came out and stated as much is genuine. Very genuine. All in all his role and play meta-wise point highly towards him being town.
Tierce, I'll ask you this: Do you think Stannis-Scum would be told that Aegon-Scum is split up? I don't. That removes him being Stannis-Scum.Do you think as Aegon-Scum he'd come out and state the make up of his faction? I don't.So overall just from that alone he's town.
Bolded part is true only if Starbuck really wanted to be choosen. At that time MoI already expressed desire to be choosen, and there wasn't a crowd waiting to choose him. So yes, Starbuck could be genuine VT asking to be choosen, or could be scum aiming to get rid of pressure once and for all with an early VT claim with town looking explanation. I cannot distinguish her motivation, this is null tell for me. But if this is town tell for you because of the bolded part, this is wrong - at that time it was obvious that nobody would seriously consider choosing those who asked for it, so this wasn't a dangerous gambit if she is scum.In post 3034, Tyene Sand wrote:Timeater - Yeah this ain't Stannis. He could be a regular Goon trying to get in a nightkill for his team via the Choose mechanic, but mind you,this is incredibly dangerous for an uninformed Aegon: because shooting someone may mean they hit one of their (unkn)own, if they really are divided.