That's a clear question. If you asked that in the beginning, this little debacle would've been over with.
So far this is what you have asked:
N wrote:Hang on, what are the two things that are different in this situation?
N wrote:So you're saying Om is answering everything sarcastically and you're flaunting a sarcastic answer in my face? And that this is hugely different and therefore Om is scummy?
N wrote:What I'm trying to figure out is what "there's a difference between answering something sarcastically every time and flaunting in someone's face when there's 5 people in the game" means.
Wait a minute! That looks like the same question as asking what the post, which is just about quoted there means! I must've totally been at fault here!
Hmm.In post 74, Zoroaster wrote:You saw that I quoted something with that right?
That just MIGHT have something to do with it.
Let's put our thinking caps on.
If I didn't, which I didn't, put quotes in 65, do you think it'd be smart to realize I was addressing you at...I dunno....
Post 64?
Post 65 is a clarification of Post 63 since you brought up the point, in Post 64, that you're asking what questions in the game required a serious answer.
Let's try to use those thinking caps again!
Why do you think that means?
!
It means that not all questions required a serious answer but some questions did and Om gave a sarcastic answer to those ones.
Now here's the fun part:
Shit! The logic matches up to what he said before Post 65! What a coincidence!Zoroaster wrote:There's a difference between "not taking the game seriously" and answering every question so far sarcastically.