Okay, I am halfway through, that was a lot to catch up on. Anyways, first point of interest is Carbon's vote where he says that it is scummy to put a player at L-2. I just don't see why it is scummy. Scum are not going to hammer someone at L-1 instantly much less two scum quick-hammering on Day 1 giving themselves away.
Regarding FourTrouble, I already get a townread on him. Based on meta, FourTrouble usually hunts for scumteams as opposed to individual scum players so his assertion that Carbon was afraid RedCoyote will get lynched matches with his usual town-meta regardless of the affiliations of the accused.
Carbon's
32 seems really opportunistic. A passing question from Syndrome and he quickly jumps onto FourTrouble while quoting Syndrome's post.
As I understand it, Charter voted RedCoyote because he already had two votes. I see nothing bad about it. Seanald's
35 calls Charter "noob-scum" looking for a quick kill. I see little scum motivation in putting someone at L-2 and any scum player is smart enough to understand that putting someone at L-2 on the first page isn't going to get them a quick-lynch and even if it did, they would be under immense suspicion. So, I disagree that Charter's vote was bad and in fact, I find Seanald scummy for calling it bad.
CarbonDioxide, explain this: "
In a nine player game with at least two scum yes, I'd say putting someone two votes from death is more significant than L-3 or "any other vote"
." [
50]
Why is it more significant?
You give reasoning saying that if there are two mafia, they can simply hammer, but this would expose the mafia members and result in their lynch making a quick hammer a poor choice.
Syndrome's
57, he seems to say that FT was implying that FT knows the RedCoyote is scum but I don't interpret it that way. FT merely said that Carbon seems afraid that RedCoyote will get lynched.
I was prepared to let Carbon slide under the notion that he was new but MOI's post
65 shows that Carbon has played mafia before. I am a little conflicted.
Agree with Charter's
79. The two votes on RedCoyote seem really fishy. Seanald provides no reasoning for his vote (I look forward to him doing so) and syndrome immediately pushes a lynch.
Seanald's
100 = fluff.
Reads do far:
Town
Charter
FourTrouble
Leaning Town
MOI
RedCoyote
Leaning scum
Carbon
Scum
Syndrome
Seanald
Currently I am at MOI's
123 which makes me want to re-consider whether Carbon is in fact scum as opposed to Seanald. I skimmed a few posts but I need to read this argument carefully and verify it. More tomorrow.
