Micro 66 - Robo's F11 (Game Over)

[Tazaro]

Less weird speak: I could go either way with CommieX

[Tazaro]

(by the way Tazaro, we have played before. I'm kondi2424. We played in "There Will Be Mafia," like, a year ago.

And before I shut up for a while, I'll have you know that I was njoseph who was with you, like, a month ago.

[Klick]

Oh. You're cool.

[CommieX]

My inference is that CommieX would posit a scumteam of CheeryDog/Militos, a pair who may agitate one's gut.
And that feels a bit uncomfortably like blatant populism that appeals to gut-based fear.
CommieX = William James Bryan.

*History nerd moment *

You'd be correct in my scumteam guess. Although Mala being V/LA and PMyst not being here makes me nervous.

[Malakittens]

This is the reason why I agreeded with Klick comment regarding PM.
Depending on the experience of the scum team they might or might not know how to read PM.
Those who have played with PM knows he's very readable depending on alignment and he cracks easily under pressure.

Me agreeing with Klick was a reaction test. Last time someone made a comment regarding PM, a scum member who wasn't aware of his meta kept digging for information regarding it. Due to this during that game it brought me to the possible attention that player was scum.

Linky here: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=84&t=23126

Reason why I voted Mit was because he was showing similar reactions to probable scum. He's squirming regarding the PM comments which is making me uneasy and want to watch him more.

[Klick]

VOTE: Mala

I expressly said that no one should mention PM's meta yet.

[Mitillos]

@Mala: Correct me if I'm wrong but what you are saying looks like:
1) PMyst is easy to read.
2) People who are inexperienced scum don't know this, nor would they be able to use his meta against him.
3) I used PMyst's meta against him.
4) I didn't accept that "We should not be talking about PMyst's meta" at face value and wanted actual reasons.
5) Therefore I'm scummy.

Either I'm not getting it right, or there's derpy logic at 4 and 5. Either way, this goes by the assumption that PMyst himself isn't scum. So, yeah, I'm not sure where you're coming from.

[Malakittens]

Klick.

I have zero power and I might not be around until Thursday or Friday. I'm posting when I can. This storm is bad to the point transformer blew and trees have fallen.

[Malakittens]

Never stated PM is scum or town. I can't even read him myself. Wanted to wait until he posts more, but I do not have time to wait for him to post.

Doesn't matter the fact you kept digging for reasons why I and others regarding PM is either you are trying to disarm a trap which if you are scum you want to do, but if you are town it's a horrid thing to do.

I'm still uneasy regarding the whole Cheery thing.

[Mitillos]

But the trap is meaningless. I gave reasoning for a read I had. Klick claimed that I should drop it, without giving any explanation. You supported him in this. Why, exactly, would you expect me to be satisfied with that and go "Oh, all right, sure, let's forget about this"? That would be a scummy thing to do anyway, as it would be trying to blend in and appease. If someone else pressed you for an explanation, I might accept it. But since I was the one who attacked PMyst, your "trap" is flawed.

Anyway, I'd rather hear something from PMyst himself. It's almost like you're trying to protect him from the rest of us.

[Klick]

By the way, when I said I could read PM in Fire and Ice, I was telling the truth.

PEdit: When did I tell you to drop a read?

[Mitillos]

I took your statement that we should hold off on what we think of PMyst to be that. I also took Mala's support on the subject to also be that. If I misunderstood, I apologise. Nevertheless, saying that we shouldn't mention PM's meta just struck a bad chord with me in general.

[PMysterious]

Oh wow. Well, I'm here. Did not expect 5 pages to go through. Anyway, I'll answer RQs.

1. Nickname you'd like to go by?
2. Gender?
3. Times you'll likely be able to post? Or not post.
4. Thoughts on meta?
5. Thoughts on reaction fishing?
6. How do you feel about walls? Do you make them?
7. Are you scum?

1. Myst (Simple?)
2. Male
3. Depends on my schedule. Mainly after 6 at least.
4. Meta? Using meta is a cheap way to hunt scum, but it works.
5. Reaction fishing is okay I guess. Not positive that it will work.
6. Walls are annoying unless you don't post often. I don't like to do walls myself.
7. What's this question doing here? Everyone's gonna say no to this.

Okay, anything you guys like to ask me?

[Malakittens]

Well. It's so easy to read him when you are his partner. I'm able to read him quite easily in every game I have played with him, but my I can't read him yet is because he's posted one thing.
Are you telling me you are able to get a clear read on PM after his one post Klick?

You never told me to give out reads, but I'm posting indications of reads for what I have up until here because as I said not sure when I'll be on next.

Null is PM, but also Taz.

Leaning a bit scum on both Cheery Dog and Mit.

I'm undecided on Commie.

Leaning town on both Klick and Tracey.

[Klick]

Oops, sorry. Just read your #107. UNVOTE:

And no, I was just putting it there for reference for you and Tracey when I get a firm read on him. Based on his second post, I'm already leaning in one direction.

I took your statement that we should hold off on what we think of PMyst to be that. I also took Mala's support on the subject to also be that. If I misunderstood, I apologise. Nevertheless, saying that we shouldn't mention PM's meta just struck a bad chord with me in general.

Yeah, it was just a misunderstanding. The purpose was to get people to read him how he is instead of adjusting their read to his meta. It helps to get reads on people, as well as connections. Scum might have decided to attack PM for his play without knowing his style.

Okay, anything you guys like to ask me?

I would like you to look closely at Tracey and tell me your read of her.

[TraceyLyn11]

Okay, anything you guys like to ask me?

I would like you to look closely at

Tracey

the entire thread and tell me your read of

her

everyone.

Do what Klick said, too, yeah, but five pages you can read easy.

I'd post more, but my mom is bribing me to do my homework. More if I have time tonight - if not, more tomorrow.

[Klick]

Tracey, start slow.

[Mitillos]

Also @Myst: Could you explain why you voted undecided, as opposed to the other options, like voting somebody randomly, not voting, or voting no lynch?

[Cheery Dog]

Let's assume you want to eventually vote to get rid of a person who questions you, he being Mitilos, and a person who asks good questions, she being Tracey.

I only want to get rid of them if they turn out to be scum, right nw I'd like them to continue to stay and ask the questions they're asking, because I'm having trouble finding my own questions to be asking.

and the boring question everyone asks, how will these so called partner tells relate when I flip town?

[CommieX]

@Cheery: Have your reads changed since you first posted them? Do you still believe the scumteam is myself and mala?

[Cheery Dog]

Not necessary, but I'm currently happy with my vote.

Klick has taken over my secondary suspicion spot, but my reads all currently based on the individual's postings.

[Tazaro]

VOTE: Mala

I expressly said that no one should mention PM's meta yet.

What's the case on MALAKITTENS

[Tazaro]

I expressly said that no one should mention PM's meta yet.

Oh, this seems to be the reason for the vote.

[Tazaro]

Not sure I would like that reason, though.

[Cheery Dog]

Are you purposefully looking for reasons to steal?

(it's a better reason to vote mala than the one I've used)