Micro 66 - Robo's F11 (Game Over)

[Mitillos]

@Tracey: I took Mala's 104 to mean what I said in 152. If you look at 106, I asked Mala if my understanding was correct.

@Mala: I'd imagine that scum would be more careful about saying something so inherently bad. (This refers to Tazaro's question about PLs).

[Malakittens]

They will and that carefulness will be noticed.

[Robocopter87]

• Pita

  : What was your first girlfriends' name?
  

  Creasy

  : Nonya.
  

  Pita

  : Nonya who?
  

  Creasy

  : Nonya business.

__________

:

|

Vote Count

|

:

• TraceyLyn11 [1] Klick
  
• Cheery Dog [1] CommieX
  
• CommieX [0]
  
• Guy_Named_Riggs [0]
  
• PMysterious [2] Mitillos, TraceyLyn11
  
  
• Malakittens [1] Cheery Dog
  
• Mitillos [1] Malakittens
  
• Klick [1] Guy_Named_Riggs
  
• Tazaro [0]

:

|

Not Voting

|

:

• PMysterious, Tazaro

:

|

Amount to Lynch

|

:

• With 9 Alive it is 5 to Lynch.

:

|

Deadline

|

:

• 11:59 PM of November 18^th, EST.

__________

[Klick]

V/LA until Tuesday

[Mitillos]

Whoa, that's quite a long time... Any chance of getting more info about that vote on Tracey today?

[Cheery Dog]

Would PMysterious be consider-able, in the light of common knowledge, as a policy lynch?

Considerable, yes.
Going to happen, no.

[Klick]

I'll be getting on at school. I may be able to make a case there.

[Tazaro]

Consider this my Friday post

[Guy_Named_Riggs]

Sorry, college is taking it out of me... I'll be on for most of the day, but after that I'm going to be

V/LA until Tuesday

Too much going on around campus and another tes to study for.

Anyways, glancing over the pages. Saw something about possible PM/GNR scum team. That's funny. PM and I were actually goons together not so long ago in this game Feel free to use that how you wish

I'm getting suspiciuos about Taz. I've seen a lot of vote jumping (vote, unvote, vote again, etc) and it doesn't seem right. Also trying to push a policy lynch, not so good

Curious to see what klick has to say about his hidden scum read. Oh that reminds me,

UnVOTE

Town vibes from tracey

Not so sure about PM, considering he's not answering anything asked at him


Yeah, so far, Taz really looks like scum

Vote:TAzaro

[CommieX]

Forgot to

Unvote.

I'll read the game later tonight, should be posting sometime tomorrow afternoon.

[Cheery Dog]

I hope GNR is able to come around to not be on V/LA soon, otherwise I'm going to have to go with him being scum because of all the lurking I've seen him do as scum in games I've halfread.
(although I haven't actually read any of his town games at all yet)

[Malakittens]

Just thought of something, but Klick's "hidden" scum read on Tracey reminds me of his play during Fire and Ice.

Vote: Klick

Right now Klick became a scum read rather than a town read.

@Klick:

Where's the case on Tracey?
What posts did she move from a town read to a scum read?

[Malakittens]

Reasons for voting Klick.

- unexplained case on Tracey.
- hidden scum read on Tracey, which feels to me as a gambit which scum Klick likes to do.
- actively posting in another game, but hasn't posted his case here yet.

Another question for Klick:

What do you think of Taz's question of possibly considering a PL on PM?

[Klick]

V/LA until Tuesday

Not making a very big post. I'm also not making big posts anywhere else, and if I was making big posts, it would probably be somewhere else. Your argument is invalid there.

Your meta consists of one scum game. I actually have been known to be fond of gambits regardless of alignment, and I can bring town examples up if you're too subjective/lazy to find them. Your argument is invalid there.

So you're left with... nothing.

As for the question, I think the idea is stupid. It has no bearing on Taz's alignment.

[Malakittens]

Really, the gambits are from different games not just one.

Doesn't matter, big or small posts, but you are posting elsewhere when you have unexplained things here. The Tracey thing isn't the only one.

you have only answered the Taz post after being pressured to do so.

[Klick]

Really? Prove that I'm more likely to hide a scumread as scum than town.

Small posts are easier to make than big posts. I'm probably going to make the small posts over the big posts.

[Klick]

You know what? This game is eight pages. I guess I'll do a read tonight.

[Malakittens]

You "lied" about my read on me during Fire and Ice, but also you are acting quite similar here to there.
Ill wait til Tuesday for a case, but if one isn't posted then I'll push hard for your lynch since you are most likely scum.

[Malakittens]

About your read on me*

[Klick]

How am I acting similar here to there that doesn't also align with my town meta?

[Klick]

Mit and GNR get town points for actually trying to get something started. GNR less so for creating something new when there was already something to talk about.

Seriously. We were getting somewhere with RVS, but then the RQS ruined it. The pro-town use of waiting for someone to call it out is good in theory, but it stalled the game. The RQS happychat group had at least one scum, maybe both.

I still stand by the fact that Cheery's first post is a big towntell for me, and that it

wasn't

easily faked. The fact that he admitted it wasn't strengthens it. #40 also doesn't make much sense to me from Cheery-scum.

The first thing that really tipped me off by Tracey is that her #36 paragraph on PM makes no sense. Her conclusion that PM was reaction fishing seems far-fetched and unreasonable, given her past experience with PM. At first, I speculated on a Tracey-PM team, and that's why I wanted to hear from PM before revealing my read on Tracey; I kinda wanted to get PM onto the subject of Tracey's post and see if he went along with Tracey's idea that he was reaction testing. However, PM's post was a town tell. There must have been some other reason for her to think that.

Tracey's reasoning in #42 is terrible when she had so much else to go on earlier. By this time I was tipped off by Tracey, and #44 shows it, as well as my team speculation.

Mala between Pages 2-3 is pretty bad discouraging scumhunting.

This may sound like a lazy tell, and it half-way is because it's midnight, but usually when people post a lot of content like in Tracey's #53 and they're town, there's usually

something

in their content that makes you think "Hey, Tracey probably wouldn't say that as scum," like in Cheery's #40 that I mentioned earlier. There wasn't. Her commentary with me about Cheery was fairly untelling as well.

Commie's sheep

was

admittedly bad.

Mit's concerns with PM's meta being hidden being anti-town are genuine. I doubt he'd put on a facade of actually caring about what people think of PM's meta enough to put it at top priority as scum. Mitillos is at the top of my town list.

Another thing that I forgot to mention: Tracey buddies me. A lot. She disagrees with my reads and tries to convince me otherwise, but she never misses the chance to call me town after the arguing.

Mala's #82 is

really

bad hypocrisy.

If I'm right about my Tracey scumread, I really doubt Taz's #85 came from her partner. However, it looks really bad if Tracey is town. Taz's posts over Page 4 look consistent, but natural.

...shit, Taz is njoseph. He goes back to null. However, the fact that he revealed himself is a slight towntell.

#104: Mala mentions PM's meta before he posts, which we had both already established was a terrible idea.

PM's posts have that... feel... as scum. I dunno. I DO know I can read him, and that he's really likely town in this game.

Mala's #113 in hindsight is also terribly hypocritical due to his insistence on me giving reasoning soon.

Gawd, I am really tired. Nothing really changes in my reads after Page 6.

Town (S->W): PM, Mit, Cheery, Taz
Null: CommieX, GNR
Scum (S->W): Tracey, Mala

[Tazaro]

Mala, I can see Klick being scum

[Mitillos]

@Klick: You seem to be saying that because you can't find evidence of Tracey being town, she's scum. Either that's sloppy reasoning, or I'm missing something.

[Klick]

I am, but that's the weakest of my reasoning.

[Mitillos]

Well, I'm not sure about post 36 either (it would seem to me that someone who loves reaction fishing will see it everywhere), but I'll concede that 42 can be bad.