In post 1674, Paid Pyro wrote:If there a perfectly acceptable townie on the block then why push for another townie.
In post 1674, Paid Pyro wrote:
If there a perfectly acceptable townie on the block then why push for another townie. I think she reads town at this point.
In post 1676, ProHawk wrote:In post 1674, Paid Pyro wrote:
If there a perfectly acceptable townie on the block then why push for another townie. I think she reads town at this point.
Makes perfect sense to me and I concur, but I will allow Pyro to explain first.
In post 1674, Paid Pyro wrote:AP, why do you feel DGB would push so hard if she's scum? If there a perfectly acceptable townie on the block then why push for another townie. I think she reads town at this point.
In post 1679, TheReverend wrote:Oh should I have let PP explain? My bad.
In post 1675, Rob14 wrote:In post 1674, Paid Pyro wrote:If there a perfectly acceptable townie on the block then why push for another townie.
Explain this sentenceright now.
@ProHawk - I rescind that assertion - I thought Cheery voted earlier than he did. If it was a bus, it was later than I thought. He's possible scum, maybe, but I still think Darthe should go first. Darthe reads like scum by a lot.
In post 1685, DrippingGoofball wrote:In post 1672, Rob14 wrote:bus'd 2/3 DGB, not 1/3
I'd bus 3/3, myself, if I felt they deserved it
In post 1686, Cheery Dog wrote:
And you've actually brought up some good points as to why I could be scum now - pity I interacted with the last scum, otherwise we could have caught them based of who I never interacted with wait your slot is the last one I interacted with right? Maybe you are scum after all.
I'm still convinced it's malp, I can't see this game balanced with two milers. The one we know to be a true miller wouldn't have claimed had malp claimed first; if that happened, it wouldn't have even been possible g to have them both vigged.
In post 1688, ProHawk wrote:In post 1686, Cheery Dog wrote:
And you've actually brought up some good points as to why I could be scum now - pity I interacted with the last scum, otherwise we could have caught them based of who I never interacted with wait your slot is the last one I interacted with right? Maybe you are scum after all.
I'm still convinced it's malp, I can't see this game balanced with two milers. The one we know to be a true miller wouldn't have claimed had malp claimed first; if that happened, it wouldn't have even been possible g to have them both vigged.
When you are the last scum, this makes zero sense.
@Rob, trying to find your case on Darthe... I can't. Wall please?
In post 1688, ProHawk wrote:When you are the last scum, this makes zero sense.
In post 1686, Cheery Dog wrote:@DGB why should I believe you to be scum just because you brought a bad idea forward? I had produced a town read on your predator which was pretty strong based on his activity levels. Although that doesn't actually confirm your slot to be town, I feel that it does indicate that you shouldn't be todays lynch .
And you've actually brought up some good points as to why I could be scum now - pity I interacted with the last scum, otherwise we could have caught them based of who I never interacted with wait your slot is the last one I interacted with right? Maybe you are scum after all.
I'm still convinced it's malp, I can't see this game balanced with two milers. The one we know to be a true miller wouldn't have claimed had malp claimed first; if that happened, it wouldn't have even been possible g to have them both vigged.
In post 1689, Rob14 wrote:
I can do a wall if you want, but it won't be for a day or three. I have a midterm, quiz, and a shit ton of homework coming up this week that I need to get under control.
So yeah, will get wall on Darthe going as soon as I can.
In post 1663, DrippingGoofball wrote:In post 1660, Rob14 wrote:If Cheery is scum, he bussed hard on CKD and to a lesser extent DC. After reading his ISO with the confirmed members of the scum-team, I do not believe he is scum. His night actions are questionable at best, but I saw very little in their interactions that points to anything but Cheery-town.
Was Cheery's choice of night action bad? Yes.
Was it anti-town? Probably.
Is he scum? No.
QUESTION.
Did he speak to the scumbags directly, or did he speak OF the scumbags only?
If he's engaging the scumbags directly and engaging them, then he's town.
If not - he's scum.
In post 1696, Darthe wrote:How the hell did the same people who came to the conclusion that the town had too few power roles to be balanced also come to the conclusion that one of our power riles must therefore be scum?
