In post 2044, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Kise wrote: Oh great, Mag is here. Now I gotta scratch mason off the fakeclaim list.
Explain.
![Embarassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
In post 2044, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Kise wrote: Oh great, Mag is here. Now I gotta scratch mason off the fakeclaim list.
Explain.
In post 2049, MagnaofIllusion wrote:In post 2048, Elscouta wrote:
Like the normal lynch is more likely to hit town than scum. Assuming the daykill is directed by majority vote, anything that makes lynching good (as opposed to no lynch) also makes having an extra kill good.
No, it's a terrible idea. Town's advantage is having as many days as possible to analyze Vote Counts, interactions, and posts. Leashing a non-Town killer helps shorten this time frame significantly.
In post 2052, Kublai Khan wrote:No, it doesn't. That's the point. It doubles the amount of days lynches that town has and halves the number of night-kills that scum has. It turns this game into a Double Day setup.
Benmage wrote:-I also consider Gorrads game a success. After hammering Nero I revealed it was fake. I was a factional cop. In a confirmed multiball game where the other sides cop faction had flipped. Nero was still having me as a #1-2 suspect, after my claim. Quite the endgame liability. Therefore, because Nero is a subpar player, I thought that a success.
In post 2054, MagnaofIllusion wrote:So what? That doesn't mean it is the best move for Town ... it's not. Again - we clearly disagree on this on a Mafia Discussion level. Quoting a Wiki Page isn't going to change that ...
In post 2049, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Return to Liten is just a personal example - ThAd was a claimed killing role that we thought might have been a SK. We didn't even think of killing him til well down the line (when only 1 or 2 scum was left) and happily let the scum with Town Cred help direct his kills to off scummy looking Townies.
In post 2049, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Return to Liten is just a personal example - ThAd was a claimed killing role that we thought might have been a SK. We didn't even think of killing him til well down the line (when only 1 or 2 scum was left) and happily let the scum with Town Cred help direct his kills to off scummy looking Townies.
In post 2052, Kublai Khan wrote:It turns this game into a Double Day setup.
In post 2060, Yates wrote:My question to you is; how different would that game have gone if ThAd was a DAY Vig? Knowing who "voted" for Tripod and seeing him flip Town, for example, would have given Town something to look at [akin to wagon analysis] so they could adjust their votes accordingly Day 3 - possibly lynching you or Hacker a day sooner. My opinion is that this acts like giving us a second Day phase without the scum kill at night. Yes, that effectively cuts our Day periods in half but is that to the Town's detriment? I think not.
In post 2062, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Also him shooting Town during the Day could have also easily led to him being lynched as a Serial Killer. So if you want to play the "What if" game it cuts both ways.
In post 2062, MagnaofIllusion wrote:I don't know why you saying "Yates thinks it is so" is meaningful on that issue.
In post 2065, Yates wrote:The point is; your argument is that Town benefits from extra days and vote analysis. My argument is that a Day vig affords us that opportunity with HALF the certain Town targets at night. Yes, scum will have *some* influence over the day kill.By comparison, scum has 100% autonomy over the night kill. Therefore, your reason for wanting to kill the Day Vig does not hold up under scrutiny.
In post 2064, AngryPidgeon wrote:So you think MoI is town?
In post 2059, Yates wrote:Also, thank you for that. That was a pretty cool read.
In post 2044, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
Tammy wrote: 2. I didn't claim my role name right away because I was annoyed.
And if I wasn’t so steadfast interested in getting Benmage to confirm his claim I would be voting you right now as this is a Newb reason and you are not a Newb.
Tammy wrote: I never said the message would get the person night killed. I said that the person who sent the message thought his message would get him night killed and so he sent it to me. His thought rang as true paranoia, and town. I'm just not telling the message. The mod did not identify the sender.
KK wrote: I want to know how much and what portions of the thread he had read before asking his opening questions on the Tammy/Banmage situation.
@MagnaofIllusion - what's your read on Acosmist?
Nero wrote: MOI replaces a scum slot?!?
Mod wrote: Votecount 2.17
Not voting - PeregrineV,Nero Cain
Tammy wrote: Why aren't you more interested in what was said in the neighborhood?
Tammy wrote: Also, someone check the math for me. Myk is concerned about being put at evens. Actually lynching me today keeps you at evens.