Thor 242 wrote:Since I had to stop and think about who you'd even push on - I actually think this is a good idea. Maybe you should shout out a top two scum reads? That would be sexy.
~bow chicka bow wow~
The truth is, at this point this puppyhalf wants to kill literally half the game. Indiscriminately. Devil take them all. And after said puppyhalf calms down a little, said puppyhalf
still
wants to fire blindly into the crowd of {Cerulean, absta, JesseShef, Soul, PiggyGal} just so that we can get somewhere and/or silence someone. Not that you couldn’t have figured that out from how these are the people the puppy is questioning/
ing at.
Simply put,
PiggyGal 161 wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Jesse
That post was just... horrid. Really really horrid. So there's 7 pages now, and all you're doing is reiterating what's already been said, just phrased slightly differently?
Love how you bring up me talking about RVS out of RVS almost double the posts later - while we've been out of RVS for quite some time. Very very interesting indeed.
That whole post looks like you're trying to be active while not really doing anything at all.
p-edit - the fact that you're still not saying what's worth noting in that quote just makes me all the more sure you just posted that to make yourself look busy and active.
Penn Jillette disapproves of this post, to say nothing of the "joke" turnaround.
JesseShef 232 wrote:Thor: What I didn’t see from absta is a hit of logic in "oh here, I can attack this or go with this and make it look credible". I just see a complete lack of inspiration for taking a solid direction. To me, that looks like he doesn’t know anyone’s alignment and is in general lost.
This is not actually garbage but something this
troper
puppyhalf disagrees with. Take him off the list.
absta 148 wrote:This is also a nicer way of saying "we were trying to misslynch absta".
Assuming you were scumhunting. Why would scum move from Piggy to absta? What made you suspect scum were on Piggy's waggon?
What do the results of your 'investigation' tell you?
This is epic defamation with no resolution on his side and yet quite possibly more Townish than any of his posts since.
The other puppyhalf disagrees about absta. We've talked it over and this puppyhalf maintains etc..
Cerulean 193 wrote:This post owns.
This post is partisan b.s.. Cerulean are encouraging Piggy to vote Jesse, while voting us and opening the possibility of voting Voidedmafia themselves. While vote-hopping isn't scummy, we know that Empire, at least,
finds casting such a wide net to be suspicious.
Soul 256 wrote:I believe I already responded to this.
And this is factually incorrect and at the recent forefront of a steady stream of terrible attempts to push on this slot.
Of the five, Soul frankly smurfs this puppyhalf off most.
Unvote: PiggyGal15
Vote: Soul2277
(L-5)
-----
JesseShef 234 wrote:Sixty: If you honestly think Cerulean is town, can you explain why? I did so about the player you’re voting for...
Cerulean's Townread came from the similarity in behavior between here and elsewhere re: Tammy. It's how Tammy scumhunts - needling players she is not familiar with for reactions. However, we still believe she is needlessly hamming it up, instead of directing it toward those she actually seems to suspect or doing something with the results. It seems belligerence for its own sake, and we know she can play the part as scum.
Tammulean has a scumread on Jesse from his first post, yet says we were not looking for motivations when we voted for Piggy. If she finds it Townish for Piggy (and themselves) to have a scumread and vote Jesse on his third post, why is
Post 79 considered premature?
(Some hijacking of this post may have been done in preproduction.)
