I always just want to pet your avatar. It just looks so SOFTIn post 672, Cheery Dog wrote:Bloody knew it.
Anyways.
I always just want to pet your avatar. It just looks so SOFTIn post 672, Cheery Dog wrote:Bloody knew it.
In post 674, TraceyLyn11 wrote:2. I'm not saying you freaking out over the hammerer is opportunistic. I'm saying you attacking him for his "reasoning" is.
In post 674, TraceyLyn11 wrote:3. It's not just to me - you seem nicer in general this game.
In post 674, TraceyLyn11 wrote:Why didn't you wait the remaining hours to hammer?
In post 682, Violet wrote:
Robo didn't lock the thread, and he didn't say "please stop posting", so why would you stop posting? We have the full cast of players and the flip results, this is the best possible situation for discussion because tomorrow two of us will be silenced. Now I'll ask again, why on earth would you intentionally stop posting?
I think I agree with this statement.In post 690, Thor665 wrote:Thread is never locked unless mod says so or actually locks it. Getting to press the action after lynch is also pro-town.
That said, no real issues with that, I just think you played it poorly.
Explain?
Why do you assume the scum were trying to kill off people who suspected them? Why not PRs? Why not based on experience? Why not to cause confusion or WIFOM? Why not randomly? Why not for shits and giggles? Etc., etc. Night analysis cannot be trusted; don't use it.In post 689, Cheery Dog wrote:I believe that makes Thor more obvtown than he already was, and if we work off Nacho's suspects, we arrive at GNR and Vio.
In post 691, TraceyLyn11 wrote:Why do you assume the scum were trying to kill off people who suspected them? Why not PRs? Why not based on experience? Why not to cause confusion or WIFOM? Why not randomly? Why not for shits and giggles? Etc., etc. Night analysis cannot be trusted; don't use it.
Why is Thor obvtown?
Also, why no vote?
In post 692, Malakittens wrote:
If you believe that either GNR or Vio are scum based off Nacho's posts why aren't you voting them?
In post 692, Malakittens wrote:Even though he thought PM was "town" he wasn't really defending him as much. He didn't try to change the direction of the lynch, he didn't make an actual case on his scum reads nor did he try. His counterwagon to PM was to vote Tracey who was his town read before that.
In post 694, Malakittens wrote:Yes, but I felt as if you shared it a little too late. >.>
In post 692, Malakittens wrote:I disagree with you on NK analysis Tracey. I have seen it work well, but then there has been only one game where it backfired literally on me.
In post 693, Cheery Dog wrote:Thor is obvtown because he would probably have kept Nacho alive if he were scum to make use of that "case" he had made during twilight.
Can someone explain to me how night kill analysis is good when scum have not flipped? You don't know the motives of the scum, it's ridiculous to try and outguess them.In post 695, Thor665 wrote:In post 691, TraceyLyn11 wrote:Explain?
My case is 'Why not?'
Also - Nacho died.
In post 697, TraceyLyn11 wrote:Can someone explain to me how night kill analysis is good when scum have not flipped? You don't know the motives of the scum, it's ridiculous to try and outguess them.
In post 697, TraceyLyn11 wrote:@Thor: 'Why not?' isn't good enough. You had Mala, Riggs, Nacho, and Mit in your scum pool.
No I'm not. If you know there is only one scum left, you can look at people for howIn post 698, Thor665 wrote:Can you explain to me how night kill analysis requires a scum flip?
You're thinking vote count analysis.
So... What happened to them?In post 698, Thor665 wrote:Correct.
So?
You are right that probably the entirety of my issue with Vio isn't the NKA - but I think that's enough to start talking about.