Elements of Nosts
Post 646 specifically the last paragraph and "If you can't see why Emp needs rope we've got more problems than me posting a mistaken draft" comes across as genuine frustration. Need to look at it again when it's not near midnight but for now I'm not as confident that the slots mafia. I want to do a massive go-over of a lot of players in the game because right now my PoE means that I have one or two things wrong likely and need to work out where it's at.
Unvote
F-16, can you explain what happened to your strong scum-read on Jacob, it seems to have dropped of after yesterday; does it have to do with you just being more confident in Nost being scum or did you actually listen to us and re-read him in a different light noticing the genuineness inside his posting.
PlanB, of DemonCores list in
Post 425 out of everyone there that's still alive the person I'm most confident about being town is UT or N. Regarding UT I think you need to really think a lot more on the interaction between Doom because while I know you're stating it's your only hesitation it's a relatively big point to him being town plus his play and interaction with us after D2 onwards comes across as town, don't think he'd be 'ignoring us' if he was scum and we were town-reading him. And regarding N now that
Black Flag Mafia is over where N was scum that game combined with the other scum-meta he prior linked point heavily, and I mean heavily towards him being town here. I'll explain the difference in his play here vs there if you want in detail tomorrow but I think skim-reading his ISOs in the other game and then re-looking at him here should suffice in showing that he's probably town. So that means on the list we're looking at likely scum inside of RC and Adorakble (Nostredeus) so want to hear your thoughts in quite some more detail on those two because I'm growing less certain on my reads inside them at the moment and now that Empires vanished for exam period I'd rather hear have somewhere to bounce reads of.
RC, I have no issue with you taking into account your town-reads reads but the degree you're weighing them above your own is the issue I have and sure I'd love examples of you doing that as town in the past so if you remember doing so in any particular games then link me the situations. And I'd like an updated reads list from you or at least the scum->town thing you do with a little bit of reasoning behind the stronger reads. Need to understand where your heads at and see if I can follow your line of thought at all. Also I know this is an odd kind of question but can you explain what you think the difference between your scum and town meta is.
In post 613, Nostredeus wrote:So A rests on the assumption that I read the OP made up some crap about Nero that just happened to be what my slot thought then miss spelt demoncore even though it explicitly says the correct spelling in the OP and then tried to leverage that? Yeah, err, okay then... Alternatively I might have miss spelt demoncore because there is a player called doomyoshi and I've just read 25 pages in a ridiculously short period of time. But w.e I'll let the town decide which is more likely. If B was true why would I be voting for empking right now? I'm sure you've got something convoluted to say about that too right?(As for the vote swap based on your predecessors, that's nice for you but to paraphrase another player from a different game "This isn't church, the sins of the father aren't absolved because you replaced in".)
I want you to slow down and explain all of this in real detail for me. Help me understand what I'm missing here. You replaced in, looked at what page first? 1? The most recent one? Looked at the OP? Typed your post, then looked at the OP? I need to understand the order in which you did things here because you knowing that NC had died means that you should know that DoomYoshi and DemonCore had died too so your reads on them and commenting on them but not on NC comes across as a fake attempt to town-tell. Sure, lets say the typo is nothing - it was a weakish element to why we suspect you anyway and much smaller than what you attempted to make it out to be in
Post 633 of yours. Okay; lets say your scum-read on 4nxiety and us isn't based solely on us having a scum-read on your slot and pushing it, explain to me slowly why you think we're scum because the scum-reads and your entire reads come across as just an OMGUS and attempt to de-credit your attackers, stating 'voted x/y' or 'your predecessors sins are yours too' doesn't explain any of it. At the same time you can explain your read on RC that you've been avoiding that 4nxiety has requested. Also about your
Post 646 where you're stating that Empking had no justification for voting Doom. In
Post 450 he stated there's very likely scum inside Demons list, in
Post 453 we pointed him towards our Toon scum-read explanation and told him to join us and that he should look at our read on Toon. He followed up on that and voted Toon in
Post 476 so I don't think his change of stance on Toon is that bad at all.
