This is so annoying. I want to actually use logic to solve this, but it's impossible without knowing anything about the set-up, the number of scum, or the team distribution. I don't get how this can be 4-4 with weakened scumteams. I'm coming up with crazy theories like Stannis having three goons and two traitors, or Aegon having a group of two who can kill and a group of three who can't.
Anyway, if Aegon is 2-2 and Varys is "informed," that means his partner is someone like Tyrion, and a reasonable assumption is that they both knew the identities of mockinjaye and bvoigt (although possibly not the other way around). Meaning mjaye's/4nxi3ty's/bvoigt's ISOs might not be helpful for Aegon tells, but Sapo's/Salamence's would be, as would references survivors make to mjaye/4nxi3ty/bvoigt/Sala/sapo.
==========
Figured it couldn't hurt to look for Aegon, even if we don't want to lynch them. And Salamence seems like the type to leave trails to his partners. Anyway, the first time Salamence interacts with a non-Minimum living player is
here. His response to pappums could easily be distancing, but I'll look at pappums rat's side of the interactions more closely when I analyze Zdenek.
Then we have
this list. I had the brilliant piece of insight that Sal probably wouldn't put Pandora as second most town if they were teammates...and then I cried. MoS, mockingjaye, and bvoigt are all listed one after the other in null. My head then proceeded to explode from WIFOM. (If Sal knew that all three were Aegon, then he would not do that unless it was either a signal or a deliberate attempt to subvert people looking at lists. But he definitely would not do it by coincidence.) Then I remembered why I usually don't bother rereading flipped scum. ANYWAY. Other placements: Magua/Cow is in the middle of the town list, while pappums/Zdenek is in the middle of the null list (two spaces above MoS-mjaye-bvoigt) and Petyr/kortul last in null (so none is more or less likely).
Sal's reaction to bvoigt is adorably awkward. Ooh, makes a throwaway comment about MoS being lol for "voting and choosing the same player." I'd say it was distancing if every other attack he made wasn't equally silly. Then comes out of the blue to say that we and MoS shouldn't be chosen because we "aren't paying enough attention to make a good shot." Goddammit, he's just toying with me, now. Is that the kind of defence he'd make of a partner?
Hmm.
Hmm.
At first I was going to say that his case on MoS was a point in favour of AV (considering that his distancing with bvoigt consists of the brilliant, "Are you scum?"). But with Sal's other scum reads just drops a vote with no explanation, asks them maybe one pointed question, get defensive, etc. On the one hand, he does get pretty defensive here (like he does with MoI), but he also makes a "case" that consists of posting quotes of MoS, but then hedges at the end and doesn't actually vote him. I could see MoS coaching him to do it (assuming daytalk)--it's like he's trying to go on the record with having a negative opinion of him. Someone less prone to confirmation bias/WIFOM paralysis weigh in on their exchange, please? That said, MoS's side of the exchange reads as fairly natural. I need to read Sal's other scum games to see just how crafty he can be.
(Okay, the end. So this was good for nothing but making me more paranoid.)
I'm not sure I'll bother doing Sapo, because not only are all their posts giant text walls, but they're probably smart enough not to out their teammates.