In post 3589, AngryPidgeon wrote:MoI, this ain't you. I realize this game is pissing you off and you are really obvtown for that.
So you buddied me when you replaced in - back when I was posting and obvTown.
You accused me of buddying MoI [amongst others] today - which was obviously nonsense.
And now you are ACTUALLY buddying MoI as we speak?
Yeah. You're not Town. You can be lynched after Zab-scum.
Nice bus. Reinforces my theory on the scum team that Pidgey was bashing. Zab, AP, Myk. Book it.
@Mykonian - is this true? Are you the messenger? If so, why didn't you message Acosmist? [just assume we already know you are scum so you don't need to lie]
In post 3588, AngryPidgeon wrote:Yates is trying to look town. His posts about him being a CW to Zab and voting Zab immediately is huge cog dis.
There's a difference between TRYING to look Town and looking Town because you ARE Town. Since you are scum, I can see why you can't make that distinction. Also, you clearly don't know the meaning of "cognitive disonance" since I said yesterday I was trying to decide between Zab and Nero. The fact that I voted for Zab today after saying I would be in support of his lynch yesterday is pretty much the opposite of cognitive disonance.
In post 3588, AngryPidgeon wrote:He is basing that off his opinion that Zab was a CW to him. That is not how town thinks.
As far as you know, it would have been a coin-flip between Zab and Nero yesterday. If it were as simple as that, yes the counterwagon would be enough to tip the scales. Reads change and I'm far more comfortable with Nero Town today than I was yesterday despite the fact I didn't agree with how he played his role the previous night. Combine that with the CW and yeah. The Zab lynch is OBVIOUS.