Micro 100: Nomination Mafia (Game over!)

[Quilford]

Day 1

>>>

MattP

(3) Wisdom, orcinus_theoriginal, jmo16mla

<<<

jmo16mla

(1) MattP

Wisdom

(1) xRECKONERx

chkflip

(1) The Acting Method

Not Voting

(1) chkflip

---

With 7 alive, it takes 4 to lynch.

Deadline hits in (expired on 2012-12-31 01:34:17).

[xRECKONERx]

I just went back and read all 70+ pages of the game that I was in with chkflip.

He started out not in the game, barely posted for a couple of days, then flaked out and left me and his hydra partner to take care of the game. His vague statements of "Reck must be scared because I know how he plays" are

bullshit

. There is absolutely no way he knows I play as scum, because the ONE game he's seen me as scum in he was barely a part of, and it all comes down to finding some sort of bullshit reason to put a vote on me without it being obvious it's OMGUS.

OMGUS isn't scummy, but

lying to cover up OMGUS

definitely is. A guilty conscience will out itself, I suppose.

UNVOTE: Wisdom
VOTE: chkflip

[orcinus_theoriginal]

It's not a META thing, it's a RELATIVE thing

I think he would be relatively more the ways I illustrated than he's being

why? See, this i my problem with your defense of Chk. You make up a scum playstyle for Chk, and say 'Oh look, he isn't doing blah blh, hence town'. It's a bit like me saying: 'Oh yeah, jmo would be hyperaggressive and post pictures of ponies as scum hence jmo is town'.

Do you really think I would pull shit out of my ass and openly admit it as scum? If I was scum I'd lie and say "yea I checked up his meta for a few mins"

This entire bit is WIFOM, and I don't really like that you're trying to use 'oh yeah that was out of my ass but scum wouldn't do that, it's too obvious'.

Unless now I'm WIFOMING you and then woa look it doesn't matter now because you have no idea wtf I was thinking so let's move on

I don't even understand this sentence.

pedit: where would the second "not" be?

in 'I'm not worried about being lynched today.'

And wait you just said that chk doesn't look scummy to you

Nope. Chk looks scummy, but I don't have a scum-read on him because he looked scummy last game we were together in. I'm sort of leaning to your read of bad-town Chk, but he would look scummy to most people I think.

[orcinus_theoriginal]

chk, I've never called reck's alignment wrong in a game. That's 3/3 games.

You think he would want you dead for that but me alive despite the same issue?

Why would he want to lynch someone exactly like him right now? He'll get to you later if you aren't his partner.

You weren't on him at all before he attacked you

I disagreed with his read on you. We are of equal disagreement to him, especially at the time he targeted you

You, me, orcinus and reck are town and I'm damn positive

already went over this. If you would stop raping the thread with your 100 posts that would be appreciated.


pedit; matt, what was "wrong" in your most recently quote of chk?

Wait, so let me get this straight, you complained and complained I wasn't giving you full reasoning for my scumread and when I do you complain I'm posting too much? You are so much fucking scum I am literally bewildered

To be truthful, I don't see where your reads are coming from, and I do think you're also posting too much. Could you consolidate all your shit into one post please? Your behavior is tantamount to spamming this thread. And do more posts like 81, that was nice. :3

Matt's use of meta as a defense is rather disconcerting because meta sucks anyways.

Chk 112 reads like scum chk trying to curry town favor. Starting to lean scum for me, especially when he says that he would be willing to hammer MattP. There's a lot of discussion that hasn't happened yet, and MattP is willing to supply it.

MattP: Stop using your playstyle as a reason for you to be an arrogant dick.

No actually I think MattP is actually town for this anger. It feels like jmo is insulting his pride as a good townie or something, so townie MattP would want to squish that in the dirt with evidence of Matt's skill. Scum wouldn't put themselves in a spotlight this much I think.

Oh wow I skipped over post 93. Yeah, Chk reading scum for me.

135: Matt, have you ever buddied people excessivley as scum? I do intend to meta you sometime tonight so answer truthfully.

137: Chk, is this case based on meta completely?

Matt, do you often invoke meta as a defense?

Yeah TAM is going to be that scum that slips under the radar and wins because I forget they're inthread and am getting distracted by people like MattP.

Reck, what's your opinion of Matt right now?

Chk owes me a question from post 80. TAM needs to contribute something--Matt, why is Wisdom scummier than TAM since I think that whatever reason Wisdom might seem scum might also apply to TAM?

[xRECKONERx]

My opinion is that Matt is town.

[MattP]

I'm here but I'm writing a play and I'm getting really excited about it so I'll respond later

[chkflip]

Chk: Are you still trying your new playstyle, and if so, stop.

Sure am, sure won't. It'd just be more words for people to find scummy. Pass.

but he would look scummy to most people I think.

Fun fact: less than 10% of the games I've played have I not come under fire slash lynched for playing how I'm playing + more words.

1.

Chk 112 reads like scum chk trying to curry town favor. Starting to lean scum for me, especially when he says that he would be willing to hammer MattP. There's a lot of discussion that hasn't happened yet, and MattP is willing to supply it.

2

137: Chk, is this case based on meta completely?

1. You saw the emote, yes? Meaning I'm willing to hammer but certainly will not for at least another five pages. At least.

2. Already answered this.

xRECKx, buddy ol' pal, my lack of posts =/= my not having read it. I've got a lot of respect for playstyles like yours, Fates, et cetera. I like how you can be completely erratic and people just accept it. Pretty awesome. Can't ever say I'll emulate it because I wouldn't do it justice, but I wouldn't say that my inactivity in that game is indicative of me having lied about it or used it as an excuse. Thanks for going out of your way just to discredit me, though. I enjoyed the effort.

[The Acting Method]

Finally, Matt's going to be quiet for a few minutes so that everyone else can get a word in edgewise.

Everyone who wasn't fast asleep like normal people for their timezone.

I am NOT getting a town read from MattP at all. He's throwing more things out there, his reasonings are WTF you make no sense.

I Don't see the scum motivations for his jmo case. In fact, If MattP is town, he's tunneling, if he's scum... It's obvious, you shouldn't be calling him town because A: He's posting a lot, I post a lot as scum too, post count does not make a player scummy. (That is, when I'm allowed to.) B: His whole intoxicated post section. And then he attacks people for joking about it?

even I got that jmo's question to me about my RVS on chkflip was a joke from my "reasoning" His scum hunting feels faked. Chkflip does seem scummy, however wisdom could be a pontential partner. And I don't believe I'm familiar enough with Reckoner to give comment on whether his play this game matches his scum meta, but it feels more town to me on a gut level. (These are mainly gut reads for me, I know I'm leaving people out but these are the stand outs.)

[orcinus_theoriginal]

156 /sucked/.

VOTE: Chkflip

[chkflip]

That's nice.

[chkflip]

YEAH, BITCH. L-1.

[Wisdom]

Wanna vote anyone, chkflip?

[chkflip]

VOTE: jmo16mla

[orcinus_theoriginal]

I'm not really sold on jmo-scum yet, though. I'll re-read the game later.

What sold you on jmo scum?

[chkflip]

Tons of flailing and deflection.

[Wisdom]

If there isn't one scum between MattP and xRECKONERx then I'll quit mafia forever.

So you don't support this anymore?

[chkflip]

They're still possible but I'm more sold on jmo-scum.

SOMEONE ELSE ASK ME SOMETHING, MAKE THIS THREESOME AN ORGY.

[MattP]

In post 153, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:
1.Chk 112 reads like scum chk trying to curry town favor. Starting to lean scum for me, especially when

he says that he would be willing to hammer MattP

. There's a lot of discussion that hasn't happened yet, and MattP is willing to supply it.

2137: Chk, is this case based on meta completely?

1. You saw the emote, yes? Meaning

I'm willing to hammer

but certainly will not for at least another five pages. At least.

VOTE: jmo16mla

Wait yer a piece of shit

[MattP]

VOTE: chkflip

IDGAF

[Wisdom]

Yeah, Matt just further confirmed he's scum.

[jmo16mla]

Chkflip that's terrible reasoning as I've done no flailing at all. Either your scum hoping to mislynch or you're just not reading the thread.

Why the change of vote after you said you'd be willing to hammer?

Also, why claim to want to hammer, but not for another five pages? Why even state intent then? Seems Likee you're either 1. Scum and are going to try to talk your scum buddy out of being lynched. Or you are just stalling for some odd reason.

[jmo16mla]

Yeah, Matt just further confirmed he's scum.

Sorry I'm dumb. Explain how?

[MattP]

Yeah Wisdom is a dumbtard

[jmo16mla]

Ah. Nvm!

[MattP]

Someone saying they will lynch the two polar opposites of an argument simultaneously when those two polars are the two other wagons available is the most flaily opportunistic bullshit ever

But yea I confirmed