In post 361, Baby Spice wrote:Thez, how about you try and tell me why Arcangel is scummy?
Because at the moment it looks like the only reason you're voting Arcangel is because she had the most votes on her.
IME, she's not reacting too well when pressure is being added.
In post 363, JacobSavage wrote:In other news ArcAngles last post is terrible. I know of no role that upon the flip of one player it causes another player to be confirmed innocent. To be it seams far too much like Scum trying to distance their buddy through the medium of WIFOM.
Wait, what? You said you think I’m town, but the only way this comment could make sense is if ArcAngel and I were scum together, which we most certainly are not. So which is it – am I scum or town?
In post 369, Jal wrote:I think you're a little scummy scum who thinks Thez will get lynched and doesn't want their name on the wagon.
I am almost inclined to agree with you there, it just doesn't make much sense to me.
Note: After reading later on, it was a derp moment for JS, so not sure where that leaves me in terms of a read based off the vote.
In post 379, BirdAndBeast wrote:Jal is looking town. I don't necessarily agree with you though. Thez has experience, he can OMGUS and that is null. But I really don't like where he essentially said that we can't 'prove' he is scum and why are we so confident. Its posturing, and its a classic scumtell.
I feel like my vote wasn't an OMGUS, because if it was, it would be against minilib, and that it would have been a bit earlier. However, it was against you, and it was out of the sheer frustration which I called noncooperation, since I felt you were ignoring my attempts to scumhunt versus you, and you self-imposed obvtown but I was unable to understand why. Nobody else told me why, you didn't really tell me why other than "we play scum badly," though there was nothing to vouch for that so I had to take it with a grain of salt.
In post 381, BirdAndBeast wrote:On the flip side of that, thez's wagon (contrary to the claims made)
didn't
form easily and
did
stall, with a lot of people defending thez, combined with the terribad early posting from thez. We'll talk it over in our QT, so nullish for now.
I felt that while it did stall at times, there was a large amount of voting in clusters (by large I mean 3-4) before and after some of the stalls.
In post 385, Baby Spice wrote:Thez. If you're really town then you should be voting your strongest scum read, not the one that you think might save your neck. That's the bit that still makes think you're scum.
Sorry for lack of clarity, but AA’s posting at the time (and I still kind of feel that way) put her as my top scum read while B&B dropped. 2/5 of my “scumwagon” reads are basically lurkers who have no real basis for their votes, but they don’t take the top spot.
njoseph wrote:I received a test vote.
Figure me out, bros.
I read your ISO, it took me 2 minutes max. That's how little substance you actually hold, and you do not have a lack of posts in this game. I don't believe I've seen any real scumhunting, not since you voted for Roger it appears to me, and that was a single question or two. Later on you voted for me with absolutely NO reasoning, and then when unseencamo votes, you go ahead and indicate that it is merely a "follow the wagon" vote. All you're doing is active lurking and you REALLY need to post something worth my time.