In post 523, thezmon221 wrote:Sure, it's suspicious, but is that all you've got? Because I feel that's a weak reason, especially since it happened early in the day.
It's enough for me. Sorry if it doesn't live up to your expectations.
In post 523, thezmon221 wrote:Sure, it's suspicious, but is that all you've got? Because I feel that's a weak reason, especially since it happened early in the day.
So what has stood out as scummy apart from him being on Ztife?In post 527, njoseph wrote:That leaves Sixx, and he's bad for being on Ztife wagon, and is not given the credit I have given to Sixx, nothing about Sixx has stood out to me as markingly, to me, townie. Markingly townie qualities is what makes the game good.
In post 522, Idiotking wrote:In post 512, The Mini-Librarian wrote:um, yeah.
unvote
vote idiotking
the top half of 511 does not lead to a b&b vote in any way. Fabricated read etc.
Don't you think it's extremely suspicious when someone makes sudden, unannounced shifts in their attitude concerning certain things in the game? Especially with the Roger policy lynch wagon. B&B helped build the policy lynch wagon on Roger, waited until Roger was being wagoned, then jumped off (even though in post 111 he said he still supported the policy lynch, and later said policy lynch candidates should be vigged so as to cover it) and said that if Roger flipped town the wagon on him would be suspicious. Doesn't that seem an awful lot like someone setting people up? And from what I read this wasn't a reaction test, or at least B&B never claimed it to be.
No, I think B&B is well deserving of a vote for this.
In post 222, BirdAndBeast wrote:Definitely possible.In post 221, Bumi wrote:I think Roger is town.
In post 223, BirdAndBeast wrote:Which'd make this highly suspect, by the way.In post 151, StrangerCoug wrote:Roger Thornhill (5): Bride of Sadistyx, SoraAdvent, thezmon221, Parama, njoseph
In post 338, HeatherA wrote:@B&B - this will be my last direct response to anything you ask of me. Your style of play annoys me so much that I've considered a couple of times already just asking StrangerCoug to replace me. You've already chased off BoS (another one of our players) with your D1 antics. This game so far has forcibly reminded me why I didn't bother coming back to this site after the first game I played here last year. As for Thez, I honestly find him hard to read D1. But so far he hasn't exhibited any of the signs I've come to associate with him when he plays as scum. Perhaps I have an unfair advantage in this regard, since I've played with him for the past 2 years pretty solidly. But frankly I think you're all barking up the wrong tree with him. If he turns out to be scum, believe me I'll be surprised.
Personally I'm far more interested in looking at the motives of those who have voted for Thez purely for the sake of jumping on your wagon. As you'll notice, I currently have a vote on one such player. Anyone who places a vote and refuses to give a reason for said vote is behaving in an exceedingly scummy manner in my book. In the games I play people are expected to provide reasons for votes. If they don't, pretty much everyone else in the game will jump on them for it and if they continue to refuse to give a reason they usually start getting voted on. What I'm seeing in this game is one or two people declaring categorically that players X, Y and Z are 100% certifiable scum (when there is no way anyone could know such a thing), and everyone else following suit blindly. That's no way to play a mafia game.
In post 362, BirdAndBeast wrote:nhammen are lesser town reads.