My statement which prompted jeck's response:
In post 880, Edosurist wrote:Re: jeck
That was an... interesting response to BB's post, namely the lack of response to anything, really. You quoted a lot, but didn't say much.
Response:
In post 913, jeck wrote:
No I figured that some of the things in his post wasn't adressed to me and it also contained a lot of BS.
You still included them in the quote though, right? If you quote it, you should have something to say to it. This isn't scummy, but don't quote a post, break it into chunks, leave them all there, and only respond to pieces of it. Look at the post I'm discussing, post 876. It's a very broken post. You simply say "lol" to one thing, and at the end, respond to only point number 3.
On the other hand, being that it was broken into chunks, you may have written up something in response, but thought it was against your better judgement. Am I right? If so, I'd love to hear what you were GOING to say. As a matter of fact, you call it BS, but you never said anything about it then. You only said it after the fact when I questioned you about it.
I felt no need to eloborate myself to a probable idiot or scum. grasping at straws...
Really now? Posts 517 and 582 seem to suggest you have a town read on him. And I don't believe that the hydra is an idiot, frankly (though one is the smarter half, I'll let them fight over that themselves
).And you say you don't want to elaborate? Town wouldn't mind elaborating. This doesn't look like laziness, but rather scum feeling a little cornered.
I won't be responding to the second part of your post, as it ends in a personal attack on Jal...
