In post 1477, njoseph wrote: In post 1475, Edosurist wrote:No, this is a different kind of sheeping.
I've tried to understand this post. It makes no sense to me.
njoseph wrote:Oh.
UNVOTE
VOTE: Bumi
What was this in response to? I don't understand the motive of it in context.
The specific criticism I previously used about his not voting was pointed out by thezmon as not fair, so I unvoted. But then I decided that with my vote needing to be somewhere, a thing I could contribute to was a bigger wagon for getting a lynch on D1; hence my setting in stone a vote on Ztife. I am not changing my vote from the biggest wagon.
Dude, the problem with this is:
1. You changed your vote to someone who hadn't posted since Sixx was killed (though he posted later on).
2. AFTER Ztife posted, you never showed any recognition towards it.
3. You willingly changed your vote back to Bumi.
4. You once again changed your vote back to Ztife.
To me, it looks like you're scared of what our reactions were and you wanted to appeal to our thoughts with these last instances. HOWEVER, noting #s 1 and 2, this is a transition of your vote from Bumi to a larger wagon, Ztife. You didn't say anything to Ztife, you didn't even acknowledge it. So, what
really
gives?
Oh, another thing - I think I should bring this post up:
In post 768, njoseph wrote:It's not fair to assume that I won't be more engaged as more information comes to the fray later.
I'm still waiting for you to become more engaged. We have more information in the form of a mafia MK.
SlySly wrote: In post 1462, thezmon221 wrote:
Uhh... I said I didn't think he was scummy and explained why I felt so. My problem still is, as it seems you don't like to read things fully, that you took full credit for his death when you made a single comment, but didn't do anything else even regarding Sixx. No real mentioning why you think he's scum/town, no real interaction with any of that stuff.
After the Ztife soft claim, I reexamined what Sixx had said. I started an interaction with him. At that point he got MK'd because of what I pointed out. Before that, I had looked at the reasoning behind his wagon, and there wasn't any good reasoning.
Honestly, at this point (and this is not me trying to cop out), we're going to have to agree to disagree. We've basically said the same things to each other in regards to this that I think we should drop it and move on. If it's used in a case later on then sure, it'll come up again, but right now we are accomplishing nothing in this aspect.