In post 886, Tammy wrote:In post 841, SnowStorm wrote:In post 829, Tammy wrote:
So, the fact that I'm still alive kind of makes me doubt SnowStorm being scum. But I also know we are not at Westeros and I probably wouldn't be first choice for a kill around here. Post 766 somewhat make me doubt a scum SnowStorm also in conjunction with the he always kills me as scum thing.I don't like that he didn't follow up with itand was waiting to see his response, but I *think* as scum he'd not bother with questioning me out of everyone else he could have questioned at the start of day 3. Like, a big part of me feels like if he were scum he'd just not want to deal with me as he'd know I was town and that I might get more focused on him if he were to try to focus on me. Does that make sense?
The follow up to that question could take me some time to write and I didn't have time for it. I also don't think it's urgent or even relevant because of rofl's likely breadcrumb, it's just that it bothered me that you stayed with your vote in KM for pressure rather than move it to Baby, whom you seemed to have a scum-read on.
But why? One rofl might not have investigated me, so dropping it like that seems odd. But why did it bother you that I kept my vote on kingmaker? What bothers me a bit about you is that you asked me that at the beginning of day even thugh you voted kingmaker over anyone else and after it was pointed put by two people that rofl might have investigated me.
I guess what's mostly bothering me is about this is that our of all things you could ask you asked why I voted kingmaker, and then say it bothered you for why I kept it there and don't follow up. I mean meta wise, you would know this isn't a thing. I'm like the worst person to look at votes wise, I spend nearly whole days without ever even voting, so im not sure why you focus on it for me and then not follow up especially since you couldn't know I voted kingmaker for pressure until I said it after you asked, so how could it bother you?
It looks to me like you picked up n something convenient and dropped it because most everyone else decided on a crumb.
I know rofl might not have investigated you, and that's why I asked you the question in the first place; because I had doubts about you and didn't want to let you go unnoticed because of the possibility that rofl investigated you. I "dropped" it because I didn't have time to follow up on it at the time and because I thought my limited time would be better put to use reading people who had higher chances of being scum. I still gave you a resumed version of my thoughts on it, which you just quoted.
I voted Kingmaker because he was my top suspect, that was pretty explicit. But you had voted him and had given no reasons for it. You had commented on how you found it weird that I hadn't said anything about KM's lackluster day 1 play, but when I did post about KM you didn't comment on it. I assumed then that the vote was for pressure, that you didn't have any strong scum tells on him and just wanted to see how he'd react to a vote. Nothing wrong with that. What is wrong is you interacting with Baby and apparently getting a strong scum feeling on her, yet opting to stay with the pressure vote on KM. The time passed and KM only made a brief appearance just to prod dodge, he never reacted to anything. Your vote had been useless and was staying useless, when it could have been used to put pressure on someone who you actually thought to be scum.
Your vote also bothered me because you should know KM isn't a very reactive player and pressuring him with votes doesn't usually work. He's constantly getting lynched and mislynched because the votes pile up on him ad he does nothing about it. I had that in mind when I voted him and the difference between your vote and mine is that I presented arguments which he could have answered to while you only had the vote, which he was more likely to ignore. Also, you know KM is an easy target and a common mislynch victim, the fact that you chose to go after him on day two over anyone else didn't make me feel any better about you.
