Loranthaceae: 6 (guille2015, penguin_alien, CityElectric, Adam-12, Junpei, T-Bone)
Malakittens: 3 (Mehdi2277, Juls, Jal)
Adam-12: 2 (Lastsurvivor, Malakittens)
Jal: 1 (GreyICE)
Not Voting: 1 (Loranthaceae)
In post 345, Mehdi2277 wrote:Junpei why did you never respond to my response for your vote reasons?
CE wrote:What do you mean by the bolded part?
Mala, I assume you mean the wagon or what looked like a serious vote by Adam here. There hadn't been a lot of discussion by that point, mainly votes. So I don't see the big deal here. Why did you decide to bring this up now though - instead of your first post immediately afterwards?
I don't get your logic here - You seem to be calling her out for making a vote whatsoever during (arguably) during RVS stage. What is your point?
Mala, you have utterly failed to respond to me. You are acting funky this game. You're being passive and reactive to things rather than active. Why aren't you voting anyone?
In post 337, Loranthaceae wrote:Mala and Jal what do you think of each other. The first one to ask me why I'm asking gets a prize
In post 355, penguin_alien wrote:Mehdi2277, how is #333, with Loranthaceae speculating on a scum group before anyone's flipped, particularly helpful? Or #337:
In post 337, Loranthaceae wrote:Mala and Jal what do you think of each other. The first one to ask me why I'm asking gets a prize
Even if he believes in the scum connection he's positing in #333, it does us little good without a flip, and even with a flip it's a pretty weak case. And I don't know what he would believe in for #337--that Malakittens and Jal interacting is relevant? Which, in general, yes?
T-Bone, why the quick unvoting?
In post 95, penguin_alien wrote:In post 89, penguin_alien wrote:Loranthaceae, any plans to indicate why you think Junpei is scum? Or why you unvoted Mehdi2277 when your post before that didn't show you buying his explanation completely? Your reluctance to pursue scumreads sounds like scum wanting to contribute without being on wagons.
VOTE: Loranthaceae
Given that you're not addressing any of the points made by any of us who are voting for you, I think it's a good wagon.
None of what Loranthaceae's posting is making me think he's any less scummy
In post 325, penguin_alien wrote:The case on Adam-12 does seem like the next best thing going.From my POV, I find it a bit odd that he seemed to have a positive read on me early in the day phase, when most of what I'd done was deny lying when it really, really looked like I was.
In post 360, Malakittens wrote:Lora. Wow. That was pure, pure OMGUS.
In post 361, Loranthaceae wrote:Where have you been all this time. That's all I have been doing. Why mention it now? U scum?
In post 362, Lastsurvivor wrote:In post 361, Loranthaceae wrote:Where have you been all this time. That's all I have been doing. Why mention it now? U scum?
So everyone that votes you is scum then...?
@Mala: I actually find it really interesting that Adam voted you for the exact same reason he did for someone else in one of his scum games. Same wording and everything. Good catch.
In post 357, Loranthaceae wrote:I'm going to let you know why I think Junpei is scummy whenever I fucking feel like it. THAT's TOWN!
In post 357, Loranthaceae wrote:Do you feel like you're some fucking judge or something.. you are supposed to go in depth, explain to me what is in your head.
In post 363, Loranthaceae wrote:What exactly is the motivation behind this question. Seriously.. there was no resistance whatsoever after my case on Adam or Junpei.. but all of a sudden I'm on penguin and now stupid questions keep popping up, wtf?