In post 595, Benmage wrote: In post 586, Vi wrote:Both Benmage and CES are people who I think would willingly jump at the opportunity to vote me
for the sheer intrinsic pleasure thereof,
and not people I could convince to do much of anything; so much like 90% of the thread, I'm apathetic.
Take this for example. This subtly dismisses both mine and CES' votes as nothing more then shock-n-awe.
Very crafty and clever is the scum Vi. You'll be enlightened.
It's not very subtle. I think you're both more likely Town - yes I know that's dangerous to say around CES - and that by this time there's not a whole lot I alone can do about your votes.
CES 598 wrote:Yeah, I know, I helped design the set-up. It was a cool set-up with a slight mountainous feel. Is that not what you're expecting here?
Ferrariday did say he was considering running Black Flag, so it's not out of the question. I do expect invitational games to be toned down to something reasonably basic, but not necessarily that far.
Disclaimer: My personal invitational experience involves wackadoo Team Mafia games.
Llamarble 601 wrote:Do you not like playing with me? I thought I played OK in Animal Rescue, or at least my reads list wasn't bad. I guess I did get run up D1 or D2 for getting off to a slow start or something.
petsPick was frustrating, though from what I remember you turned out Town (and did well) in the end.
Further pointless explanatory words go here, etc., bottom line is that I apologize for being semi-arbitrarily bitter - especially in this game.
---
Anytime someone wants to get the show on the road would be fine.
Deadline's getting closer and Faraday's job is getting boring, though that's partly because he's not posting more awful #hashtags.
Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.
Okay? Do you know what the word dumb means? You could call it a fake reaction if you want; although I doubt I would even think to say something like that if it weren't a reaction I had. 