Not Voting: DeathRowKitty, YOLO, Nachomamma8, Goodmorning,
With 4 alive it takes 3 to lynch
Deadline: (expired on 2013-03-24 00:09:37)
In post 1104, DeathRowKitty wrote:2) So yesterday (as in day 3, not RL yesterday), I did some rough plotting stuff out in a Notepad document (that I've since lost in an unfortunate smelting accident) with the conclusion that goodmorning should kill if and only if scum didn't kill her (so basically, as long as scum didn't know she was killing). Nacho's strange push to get her to shoot frustrated me yesterday for helping take away our WIFOM control and making it super-likely (even moreso than it already was) that goodmorning would kill while advertising that fact to scum. I don't think Nacho would make that oversight on his night kill. This is a weak reason because Nacho as scum could have reasons for wanting to keep goodmorning alive that would outweigh potential night actions, but it's something to note.
In post 1110, DeathRowKitty wrote:Unless you count my start-of-day-2 kthx-sheep vote on q21, I only unvoted q21 once, and that was to get on a wagon I thought had some chance of competing with the L-1 goodmorning wagon. Not to say I didn't prefer Ztife-scum to q21-scum at the time.
In post 1110, DeathRowKitty wrote:By "reaction to Kthx's vote on q21", do you mean the fact that I followed him without question or my post after he explained his reasoning? If you're referring to the former, asking for a reason would have been bad. If you're referring to the latter...well then I don't really have anything useful to say.