In post 698, Human Destroyer wrote:Which questions?
The explanation requests in Post 674.
In post 692, pieceofpecanpie wrote:
In post 679, SafetyDance wrote:People I'd like to lynch today:
NS - Obvious. Has he even done anything today? Notice he lurked like fuck but still joined the lynch d1? Alarm bells much people? If we ML twice in a row and he makes it to D3 I will rage.
And yet, no vote on NS...
In post 698, Human Destroyer wrote:
It's SK hunting because he's pretty much using GM's "he's not playing to either meta so he's 3rd party" as his real reason to lynch me.
In post 692, pieceofpecanpie wrote:In post 617, SafetyDance wrote:FFS, you said yourself you agree with my NS argument before butnow you're saying you don't understand anything?
Good job misrepping me some more. Your counter-argument is bunk. I understand plenty. I understand that you're not looking town and I understand that you can't read.
In post 692, pieceofpecanpie wrote:
Listen dunderhead, if you're going to spend the whole game using little initiative except to craft aggressive counter-attacks on players at least learn how to read what's being said. Did I say NS was town? Nope.
You may recall I said this? (you can read all of it, but at least do the underlined bits)
In post 509, pieceofpecanpie wrote:And for my final thought let's talk briefly about NS. NS is thus-far useless. Lurking, scummy, vague you name it. There is no way I want to see NS coast into Lylo at this rate.However, NS can also be the go-to name for anyone who wants to derail any current discussion.Start a bit of open speculation about someone's post and anyone can barge in yelling "NS is scummy! Kill him!" and the thread will collapse into a session of scumminess of lurking vs his meta and so forth.I'd much rather if the suspicion was cast on people making those sorts of easy calls, rather than NS himself for the time being.
In post 692, pieceofpecanpie wrote:
Heeeey, settle pettle. You are perfectly capable of defending yourself. It's not so much a defence though, as an opportunity to flex your counter-attack muscles. Is that really productive? You know what I don't see you doing: taking initiative to put forward cases, or push lynches. Is that because you're a coward?
Oh yeah, would you like one of these?
Spoiler:
That's what you're doing with NS, and beyond that you're just blasting away like a senile old man at anyone who invades your space. And yet, no vote on NS...
In post 679, SafetyDance wrote:People I'd like to lynch today:
NS - Obvious. Has he even done anything today? Notice he lurked like fuck but still joined the lynch d1? Alarm bells much people? If we ML twice in a row and he makes it to D3 I will rage.
And yet, no vote on NS...
In post 679, SafetyDance wrote:To get it in one clear post. People I'd like to lynch today:
NS - Obvious. Has he even done anything today? Notice he lurked like fuck but still joined the lynch d1? Alarm bells much people? If we ML twice in a row and he makes it to D3 I will rage.
HD - fake-hunting, wasting time, not reading thread properly or ignoring things entirely
Pie - massively tunnelling, focus on himself, largely unhelpful, afraid to be on a wagon
Edo - Backup. Looking scummy, dead town's top read d1, hasn't done a lot. Lynch has traction if I can't get people to agree to the other three
CD - Cooled off his lynch, so he's a fallback.
That's in order. HD get's the vote for reasons summarised and listed above in more detail butI'm not going to persist with beating a dead horse about NS, if people agree and want him lynched then of course I'll vote him.
In post 692, pieceofpecanpie wrote:
In post 509, pieceofpecanpie wrote:I'm noticing an emerging pattern from Safety where what he says isn't quite lining up with what he's doing.
In post 675, SafetyDance wrote:You did the same in your vitriolic spewfest against GM between 389-443, I'm amazed you didn't get on the wagon. In fact putting your diatribes aside, you get scum points just for you're bullshit tunnelling on GM whilst her wagon was building and not voting her and despite your "intent" to hammer and with ample opportunity, passing it up.
Oh again, I'm not surprised that your cheap shots completely misrepresent what actually happened:
In post 509, pieceofpecanpie wrote:Alright, I want to get a few last thoughts down as a summary and then hammer this thing. I hope no one minds too much that it's not last second, I don't consider it likely that more fresh voices will enter in the last hour or so [...]
In post 510, pieceofpecanpie wrote:Damnit!
People have appeared out of the woodwork.
I'm off to grab a beer now, so I have to pass hammer duties on to someone else in case I don't make it back for the deadline.
So you're essentially just bouncing onto wagons that others have created, while continuing to spew the same filth at anyone who so much as doubts you and ram some sort of pro-town message down their throats. That's both opportunistic and cowardly. Essentially you're setting yourself up so that you can't be held to blame for mislynches that your on because the lynchee isn't NS and yet you aren't trying to get everyone to vote NS. That's bullshit.
In post 692, pieceofpecanpie wrote:
Listen dunderhead,
That's what you're doing with NS, and beyond that you're just blasting awaylike a senile old manat anyone who invades your space. And yet, no vote on NS...
So you're essentially just bouncing onto wagons that others have created, while continuing tospew the same filthat anyone who so much as doubts you and ram some sort of pro-town message down their throats. That's both opportunisticand cowardly.
In post 1, Gammagooey wrote:
4) Don't be a jerk to the other players. I'll give you a warning if you get out of hand but continued breaking of this or any other rule will result in either a force-replace or modkill.
You can get fucked calling me a coward. It should be blatantly obvious that I am perfectly capable of defending myself again you're infantile, asinine accusations you call reads.
Because it's all you seem to be doing. But hey, the more you beat your chest doing it, the scummier you look. You did the same in your vitriolic spewfest against GM between 389-443, I'm amazed you didn't get on the wagon. In fact putting your diatribes aside, you get scum points just for you're bullshit tunnelling on GM whilst her wagon was building and not voting her and despite your "intent" to hammer and with ample opportunity, passing it up.
In post 696, Human Destroyer wrote:@Belisarius: Where do I express nervousness? If anything I'm expressing frustration.
In post 703, Gammagooey wrote:Votecount #17
Edosurist (3) Zaicon, implosion, ac1983fan
Belisarius (2) Edosurist, Cheery Dog
SafetyDance (2) pieceofpecanpie, Human Destroyer
Human Destroyer(2) SafetyDance, Apozzle
Cheery Dog (1) Belisarius
ac1983fan (1) Nobody Special
implosion (0)
pieceofpecanpie (0)
Apozzle (0)
Nobody Special (0)
Zaicon (0)
Not Voting: Nobody!
With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch!
Deadline: March 26th 9:00pm EST
In post 711, SafetyDance wrote:HD, NS claims to have read the thread and now thinks your town read is scum. Why aren't you even talking about him?
In post 674, Zaicon wrote:I... what? What is the point of you doing your page-by-page analysis (without actual explanations), only to "hard-reset" and change your reads (on some people)?
In post 674, Zaicon wrote:In post 655, Human Destroyer wrote:I'm assuming there's scum on this wagon.In post 661, Human Destroyer wrote:I've already explained why; I think there was one (probably only one) scum on the Apozzle wagon
Where did this assumption come from?
In post 674, Zaicon wrote:Will you explain this further?In post 656, Human Destroyer wrote:I find it interesting that both Belisarius and SafetyDance had their votes off this lynch, but not Apozzle.
This looks like they want to avoid being on two town wagons.
In post 674, Zaicon wrote:That's not his reasoning/conclusion in Post 110, which was where my claim came from. I also agreed that SD's reasons for voting PoPP were weak, but I also explained my stance on that as well.In post 657, Human Destroyer wrote:I don't like this, because I read POPP's reasons for voting Safety and it's actually because Safety's reasons for voting POPP are really damn weak. So this is a combination of a misrep and a chainsaw defense.
In post 674, Zaicon wrote:I'm sorry I didn't have a particularly strong read on anyone?In post 658, Human Destroyer wrote:This post is also fency about a lot of people.
Normal wagon trends. I subscribe to the newsletter of "on most wagons, there is at least one scum, but not all of them"
In post 715, Human Destroyer wrote:
Normal wagon trends. I subscribe to the newsletter of "on most wagons, there is at least one scum, but not all of them"
In post 715, Human Destroyer wrote:
Well why give a big wall of reads if they're mostly null? There's no real point to it except to fill up the page with words and look like you're contributing, which is scummy.
In post 718, Nobody Special wrote:HD: When you got your replacement Role PM, were you happy?
In post 720, Cheery Dog wrote:In post 715, Human Destroyer wrote:
Normal wagon trends. I subscribe to the newsletter of "on most wagons, there is at least one scum, but not all of them"
That's a long name for a ragular publication, you should get them to shrink it to something more catchy so I won't look silly getting a copy to see how big and actually useful that "most wagons" is; I'm currently thinking it's about as useful as the sentence I just wrote.
In post 715, Human Destroyer wrote:
Well why give a big wall of reads if they're mostly null? There's no real point to it except to fill up the page with words and look like you're contributing, which is scummy.
Is that your opinion on all big walls of reads, or just ones that are full of nulls?