Zoraster here. Mainly been letting the Pony do the driving in the game start here as it's not exactly my favorite thing in the world, but I'm here and I think that Rainbow will not object to my pivot. So here's my take:
VOTE: Antilles
Not usually a fan of policy lynching generally, and I think the "games unbalanced therefore we policy lynch" is specious both because the logic is wrong and I dispute the premise. However, I DO like the Antilles vote despite a lack of content from him and here's why:
1. Head claiming IS pro-town. I don't know if it's truly anti-town to resist it
at first
because there are a myriad reason you might think you can keep your identity secret, but once it becomes clear that it's a distraction, give it up and play the game. Because the ability to analyze a player in full is something that is quite helpful to the town. Avoiding that, and carrying someone through to later in the game helps town not in the least.
2. If he didn't head claim, that'd be one thing. But he doesn't head claim AND he basically refuses to engage with the game as a whole. Just do an iso on the guy. It's not just that he hasn't posted or that his posts have been fluffy.
3. Getting rid of purposefully anti-town players is ESSENTIAL in a mountainous setup. There is no question of whether maybe Antilles is just trying to hang back in the shadows to protect a power role. Because there are no power roles and mafia can't kill him. If you think this fundamental change does not alter the playing field of the game you are WRONG. Please step back and analyze this as a nightless mountainous game. A general aversion to lynching those with SECRETS is unfounded here.
Here's the question that I pose to everyone:
Assuming that Antilles is as worthless going forward, refuses to engage, and refuses to even give us a way to evaluate whether the heads' meta matches up with such conduct (or that the guy tends to lurk until later where he'll actually provide content), will we not need to lynch the guy in the future ANYWAY? And assuming the answer is YES (and it should be), are we remiss in not lynching him now when we have a reasonable expectation of his conduct later?