Page 20:
In post 477, Metal Overlord wrote:
Bulbazak wrote:Except if you had read through the thread, you would have gotten all the context you needed. Thus, those reads should have been all that was needed. Fact of the matter is, you went about it backwards. ISOs are nice, because they give you a bit of overview on a person's actions without reading through the thread. They're good time-wise for getting quick reads or going over your reads. However, if you want the best reads possible, you go through the entire thread, because then you get everything in context. However, you're claiming to have done the opposite: looking at context for preliminary reads and then without to finalize. Like I said, backwards. Sounds like someone got caught.
Sounds like noobtown instead of scum to me. I mean, lazy towns probably won't bother to go through the entire thread just to "get everything in context" I probably wouldn't either. Caught for laziness? Yeah. Caught for Scum? Not necessarily.
Except he said that he read through the ENTIRE thread FIRST, to get his basic reads. And THEN he ISO'd everyone to flesh his reads out. My point was that the whole process is backwards. If you have already read through the entire thread, you already have the context you need for your reads. It makes no sense to then go through the ISOs. I'm not saying he's lazy at all. I'm saying he lied.
In post 477, Metal Overlord wrote:
Bulbazak wrote:No there isn't, unless you're saying that we have a neutral party in the game, which is impossible given the setup. Therefore, null and neutral mean the exact same thing.
Bulbazak is right. There are only 2 scum factions in this game; they are either scum, not scum or unknown. Neutral = notsure = unknown = null. But despite this, I fail to see how this is a scumtell.
I never did say it was a scumtell. Your partner just wanted to argue semantics with me. However, as Titan later says, that is suspicious.
In post 477, Metal Overlord wrote:
I agree that most of your points here are true and accurate, but the problem here is that they aren't scumtells. Not at all. I have seen a majority of (bad) town players guilty of such things, one or another, and once again I repeat that bad play =/= scum. Bad play are grounds for a policy lynch, but you are incorrect that there is mounting evidence and scumtells to lynch me and my other head.
Once again I support you for your attempt at the self-vote and I support you for the useful reads and finger pointing you have done for the town.
I hope we can work together for the town. We would make a great scumhunter team. There are no night kills so I believe it is safe to play my best without fear of sniped in the night.
You're right, bad play does not equal scum, and not all of my points are scumtells, as some were just responses to KX. However, some of the major points that I did bring up ARE scumtells which point to an overall pattern of pacification and deceit. To be honest Metal Sonic, I think I would enjoy playing with you. Maybe next time we're in a game together, you might actually be town. But for now, your attempt to buddy up to me is noted.
Also liking what I see from Jennifer. And I agree with Titan's response to the MO post.
Finished page 20. On to page 21.
