Mini 1430 - Pokémon uPick Mafia (Game Over!)

Limo · Post Post #1475 (ISO) » Thu Apr 25, 2013 4:17 pm

The whole consecutive aspect will unavoidably be revealed, since only three night phases have passed.

Meh, whatever.

Targeted Glork N1 because I thought he was a very viable scum target; turns out Lord Mhork visited him.
Targeted Wisdom N3 - this was a toss up between him and Glork. My reasoning is as follows:
a) Baby Spice is likely scum, and in the event she isn't, scum will not be targeting her (the reasoning is two-fold: if she's telling the truth about being a commuter, they won't risk a kill, and the fact that she's under heavy scrutiny right now can be used towards their advantage).
b) Fuzzy would not be killed - pretty obvious that he's vengeful.
c) serrapaladin (under the assumption that he's not scum) - ascetic townie; he wouldn't be targeted for a night kill and watching him would be fruitless regardless.
d) Aj the Epic - probably would not be killed over other more useful investigative roles, IMO.
e) Ms. Marangal - If town, had fuzzy, unsure reads and could really be swayed either way. Relatively more manipulable than others. Yeah - and this is taking into account all nonexistent goodwill - she would be a tracker if town. Still think a competency kill over a power role kill would've occured.
f) Wisdom and Glork would more strongly push their agendas (agendas I agreed with, for the most part).

So, yeah. How likely is it that scum were afraid of town power role work and decided to no kill, in lieu of other possible options?
Also, if you think there's a traitor, Glork, who do you think it is, and his/her play fit for one?

Limo · Post Post #1476 (ISO) » Thu Apr 25, 2013 4:17 pm

Oh, silly me - no one visited Wisdom N3.

Limo · Post Post #1477 (ISO) » Thu Apr 25, 2013 4:19 pm

Also, why did you want me to claim all my results, Glork?

Glork · Post Post #1478 (ISO) » Thu Apr 25, 2013 5:20 pm

I haven't had time to go traitor hunting, I only got the idea because I mentioned mafia traitors outside the context of this thread and had a eureka moment.

But I wanted your results for completeness and to help assess the possibility of you yourself being a traitor.

Baby Spice · Post Post #1479 (ISO) » Thu Apr 25, 2013 5:30 pm

Serra, why would my last two lines be related?

I still think you're scum. I thought Seanald was scum and had links to you.
Seanald flipped scum so vote #1 scumspect.

The other was providing info for the town.

serrapaladin · Post Post #1480 (ISO) » Thu Apr 25, 2013 5:46 pm

In post 495, Seanald wrote:and your going to believe what you want to believe. Me and Serra are just hardcore budding man, My dick is right in his asshole air tight feeling right.

Yeah, links...

Wisdom · Post Post #1481 (ISO) » Thu Apr 25, 2013 8:19 pm

I think that's a stretch, Glork; a traitor is not a standard role and I don't really see it included here.

Wisdom · Post Post #1482 (ISO) » Thu Apr 25, 2013 8:22 pm

Either scum(that don't include Baby) wanted to implicate Baby further (which I don't see as likely given the fact she was already the most likely lynch today so they didn't have to no-kill for that), or scum (who include Baby) wanted to try and clear Baby in hopes that we will buy she was shot and commuted, which didn't work so Baby claimed she didn't commute to confuse us further.
Obvious which of the two I think it is.

Ms Marangal · Post Post #1483 (ISO) » Thu Apr 25, 2013 8:34 pm

hrm..

I'm still not sure on Fuzzy, I don't really know if I believe his claim but if he is vengeful I'll hammer and die along with him. The fact that there was a kill

might

have cleared him as he didn't do anything last night, however there wasn't one. I still believe that scum is WIFOM'ing us and tactically chose to not submit a kill last night

Wisdom · Post Post #1484 (ISO) » Thu Apr 25, 2013 8:42 pm

In post 1483, Ms Marangal wrote:The fact that there was a kill might have cleared him as he didn't do anything last night, however there wasn't one

Even if there was a kill he wouldn't be cleared as there are two scum alive. You used the same argument about Seanald and Baby, and it's completely wrong.

Glork · Post Post #1485 (ISO) » Fri Apr 26, 2013 1:42 am

In post 1482, Wisdom wrote:Either scum(that don't include Baby) wanted to implicate Baby further (which I don't see as likely given the fact she was already the most likely lynch today so they didn't have to no-kill for that), or scum (who include Baby) wanted to try and clear Baby in hopes that we will buy she was shot and commuted, which didn't work so Baby claimed she didn't commute to confuse us further.
Obvious which of the two I think it is.

lol

Good ol' Wisdom.

Aj The Epic · Post Post #1486 (ISO) » Fri Apr 26, 2013 1:52 am

VOTE: Marangal

Facts are starting to point to bad play of hyperion, not town slip. Bad target to track and bad reasoning to track. Third time our tracker has turned up completely and utterly useless. Also remember that Hyperion tried clearing Seanald with "Seanald didn't go anywhere so it wasn't him" move.

Wisdom · Post Post #1487 (ISO) » Fri Apr 26, 2013 2:48 am

In post 1485, Glork wrote:lol

Good ol' Wisdom.

It's basically the scenarios you brought up, with the traitor one removed, so I don't get the laughter.

Glork · Post Post #1488 (ISO) » Fri Apr 26, 2013 5:46 am

No it's more the laughing at your inability to consider ideas which you yourself did not promote. It's the exact same thing that led you to shove a Mac lynch down our throats, and the automatic downplaying of the possiblity of a Traitor is super sketchy.

Wisdom · Post Post #1489 (ISO) » Fri Apr 26, 2013 5:51 am

Blah, okay, even if I accept that there might be a traitor (which I really don't consider a possibility but whatever), who do we lynch?

serrapaladin · Post Post #1490 (ISO) » Fri Apr 26, 2013 5:56 am

Glork, are you thinking 3+traitor?

Oversoul · Post Post #1491 (ISO) » Sat Apr 27, 2013 2:50 am

Read about the new game coming up this fall.

Votecount 4.1

Baby Spice (1) - Wisdom,

Ms Marangal (3) - serrpaladin, Limo, Aj the Epic (L-2)

serrapaladin (1) - Baby Spice
Not voting (3): Ms Marangal, fuzzybutternut, Glork

With 8 alive it takes 5 to lynch.
Deadline is on May 8 at 8:00 PM EST.
(expired on 2013-05-08 20:00:00)

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1492 (ISO) » Sat Apr 27, 2013 5:13 am

Hmm. AJ?

Aj The Epic · Post Post #1493 (ISO) » Sat Apr 27, 2013 9:46 am

Aj what?

@Oversoul

: Yes I have. Kind of excited. Now to decide whether spending enough money to buy X/Y plus a 3ds is worth it...

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1494 (ISO) » Sat Apr 27, 2013 4:30 pm

Curious as to what your thoughts were.

Wisdom · Post Post #1495 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2013 12:11 am

Activity sucks.
No idea why we're not lynching Baby, but sure we can do Marangal first.

VOTE: Marangal
L-1.

Baby Spice · Post Post #1496 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2013 1:53 am

In post 1480, serrapaladin wrote:
In post 495, Seanald wrote:and your going to believe what you want to believe. Me and Serra are just hardcore budding man, My dick is right in his asshole air tight feeling right.
Yeah, links...

Oof course he'd say something like that right after some of those said links were pointed out.

Aj The Epic · Post Post #1497 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2013 4:43 am

We've got a good amount of time to the deadline, but really there isn't any explanation to the no kill. If we don't understand it, perhaps the best way to go about it is to ignore the no-kill choice completely.

Ms Marangal · Post Post #1498 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2013 11:57 am

God...

this sucks

V/LA until tuesday

but if I get lynched then go after Wisdom or fuzzy or Serra

Wisdom · Post Post #1499 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2013 12:01 pm

I thought you suspected serra and Limo, but interestingly you put serra last and you don't include Limo at all.

Okay.

Hammer this.