Mini 1452 - Inevitable Mafia (Game Over)

[RadiantCowbells]

I'm going to re-vote for DCLXVI for now.

Don't hammer him until I get a chance to make my final decision for what I want to do today.

VOTE: DCLXVI

[ThAdmiral]

pls unvote dcl.

Actually, do whatever. If someone is bold enough to hammer him, and he is indeed mason - they will go down tomorrow.

[gorckat]

Radiant- if you don't want him hammered, you don't put him at L-1.

[DCLXVI]

radiant wants someone to hammer me but she wants an easy out so she isn't responsible for the lynch. that is scummy as hell.

[Rob14]

Vote: Radiant

Agreed.

[Does Bo Know]

Rob do you usually vote hop that easily?

[DCLXVI]

Before I get into analyzing some of the reactions (both good and bad) to my claim. I want to say a few things:

1. I have one mason buddy
2. For obvious reasons that mason buddy was NOT one of the people voting me.
3. I will absolutely not reveal who that person is day 1. I will explain that more later today but there is no good reason for me to be outing my partner at this point.
4. If I were to die before naming my partner, at latest he or she should claim the day before lylo is likely to occur.

@cooldog, your bullshit post claiming my formatting was bad was really, really stupid. One, because it wasn't bad, two, because even if it was bad. I had mentioned several times that I was limited to phoneposting yesterday so of course making my posts look good was going to be a lot harder.

[jmo16mla]

JMO - The sentence I quoted sounds reluctant to me. Why? Were you reluctant in what you posted or not? Am I off the mark in thinking it sounded that way? What is your current read of DCL? etc.

Reluctant as to beleive his read? Is that what you're asking? That would be better than "you sound reluctant"

[Rob14]

Rob do you usually vote hop that easily?

I do when someone puts someone at L-1 while simultaneously stating that they don't want the person lynched without giving any reasons that a vote is warranted after having previously unvoted that person not long ago.

[Rob14]

JMO - The sentence I quoted sounds reluctant to me. Why? Were you reluctant in what you posted or not? Am I off the mark in thinking it sounded that way? What is your current read of DCL? etc.

Reluctant as to beleive his read? Is that what you're asking? That would be better than "you sound reluctant"

Reluctant to believe the claim. Again, I want to know why it came off that way. Were you reluctant or was I off base? What is your current opinion of DCL and his claim?

[jmo16mla]

I thought he was town PR all along. Town PRs often begin to seem to flail earlier than scum because they are obviously town in their mind, while scum try to keep it cool until its absolutely needed.

[DCLXVI]

Laptop crashed....I guess watching got illegally may not have been a great idea....

Anyway... that post I said I was going to make probably won't come today cause I have no desire to phone post something that big.

[Yates]

I'm not sure about this, but I don't like that mason claim, partly because masons were discussed earlier in the game...
Should we get the other mason to confirm?

Straw....

Camel's back = broken.

VOTE: TMTOLBTWNTOF

[Does Bo Know]

^^I don't understand.

[BROseidon]

Okay, now I'm comfortable taking DCL's claim at face value. Obviously will reconsider if information pops up that contradicts what he's given, but what he's given makes sense.

Really hate what RC did there. Makes 0 fucking sense in terms of town motivation, but also little sense in terms of scum motivation since scum should not be willing to so blatantly trade one person for a mason. Same thing with me wanting to think Cooldog is town - the move is just too blatantly idiotic for me to believe that scum would pull something like that. Does anyone have scum meta on either Cooldog or RC? Do they tend to play very boldly in the day phase as scum?

Like my vote on letters still, and the thing that Yates quoted just further supports scumletters.

@Rob, Cooldog, TMT: Do you still want DCL to reveal a name for his mason partner, or are you fine with what he's given us?

@MOD: Can we get updated vote counts at the top of each page, or an up to date vote count post? Thank you

[Rob14]

I still think DCL should reveal the name of his partner. No down side if he's town, major up side if he's scum. Right now, I'm focusing on Radiant atm, though.

[Kitoari]

Votecount #4:
TMTOLBTWNTOF - Does Bo Know, DCLXVI, BROseidon, jmo16mla
DLCXVI - TMTOLBTWNTOF, gorckat, Rob13, CooLDoG, RadiantCowbells,
jmo16mla - Yates

Not voting - guru guru, nhammen, ThAdmiral,

With 13 alive, it takes 7 votes to unperson someone!

Deadline is May 29th.

[Rob14]

You missed my latest vote in that vote count, Kitoari.

Vote: Radiant

[DCLXVI]

Yates is voting TMT..not jjmola

[DCLXVI]

There is a very obvious downside to me naming my partner rob.

[Rob14]

There is a very obvious downside to me naming my partner rob.

Which is?

[RadiantCowbells]

V/LA for a day.

See you then.

[ThAdmiral]

I still think DCL should reveal the name of his partner. No down side if he's town, major up side if he's scum. Right now, I'm focusing on Radiant atm, though.

What do you mean "no down side if he's town"?

Why don't we all just mass claim then?

[Rob14]

DCL, if he's a town mason, is dead tonight or possibly the next night, agreed?

Alright, if we accept that, then his partner is just a VT. I'd rather that VT turn into a 100% no WIFOM confirmed townie - an innocent child, if you will - upon DCL's death and flip.

So no, I see no downside in this specific situation.

[gorckat]

unvote

@Mod- status on guru?