In post 116, Does Bo Know wrote:Also, Fuzzy does state later that a "town response" would be to ignore...something. I don't know exactly where, but it's in his ISO, and ignoring Horus's 22 could be his own interpretation of a "town response."
Do you agree with this take on a town response? Also, don't you find it odd that fuzzy's action would stem from an interpretation on "how to act as town", rather than from a natural reaction to things being discussed?
Not really, because someone shouldn't think of town responses to things based on their thoughts; they should think of town responses based on how the player interprets it, reacts to it, etc. Fuzzy always thinks that, but this is the first time that his ignoring a vote is a specific example of thinking that's how town responds. (Remember when my first vote was a policy lynch on Fuzzy? It's because I find him impossibly hard to read.)
In post 116, Does Bo Know wrote:Are we to assume you agreed with everything you did not mention? Duly noted though.
I like to point out my thoughts on things that I agree or disagree with, whether they determine alignment or not. Think of it like this: the catch-up summary I make is 90% based on my thoughts at the time of reading that post, as if I would've made a post in real-time at that time. (I say 90% because sometimes my catch-ups could be after a lynch and my thoughts would be altered based on a player's flip.)
In post 116, Does Bo Know wrote:This is one of Horus's questions that I liked because it got the game out of RVS, and it looked like it could give Fuzzy some pressure.
What do you make of fuzzy not answering these questions?
At first I would've thought it was scummy, but his interactions with Zionite made me feel like Fuzzy found that more important than answering an RVS question. Remember, Fuzzy thought the question was invalid later in the topic, and he probably thought that at the time, too.
Note:
34 was
post, so I don't see why I should answer the question about Fuzzy thinking Horus is overreacting, when Fuzzy never said that in the first place.
In post 116, Does Bo Know wrote:38: He’s not flailing. Jesus.
The addition of he who died for our sins does hint at a certain difficulty to understand Zionite's stance. Same question as above: Do you think it's scummy that he's trying to construe Horus' reaction as flailing? Or do you see it as an honest interpretation that you happen not to agree with?
I just disagree with Zionite. I don't think it's scummy, because if it was, I would've said something in my summarized thoughts on why Zionite is scum. That's why the summary is there.
So, Zionite's reaction to Horus out-of-RVS-questions to fuzzybutternut are the only real argument we should remember from this segment. What do you think of other people's reactions to these questions?
Everyone active except Wisdom thought Horus was town for that shit. I think Horus is town for that shit. It's hard not to see Horus is town for that shit. I'm actually going to tell you right now: I'm not getting into details because that's going to be a chore and I highly doubt it's going to help advance the game forward.
In post 116, Does Bo Know wrote:49: Eh. Wisdom normally asks questions like that, so I don’t agree with the vote.
...
Did you meta search every player here? do you seriously expect other players to do this for the others?
Nope. I didn't expect you to meta search Wisdom when you made your vote, but when I say that Wisdom normally asks questions like that, you could either trust me, or go look for yourself at Wisdom's games. But if you wanted Wisdom lynched for being Wisdom, then yes, I would've expected you to meta search Wisdom first.
How do you feel about post
56?
I don't agree that Zionite was trying to turn it into a lynch. But...ugh, from anyone else, 56 would be scummy, but I don't like playing with Fuzzy because I can't read him. There's literally no better way to say that.
This is one of the instances where I slightly town-read you for following my processes up to that point.
In post 116, Does Bo Know wrote:Yeah, I guess this would be sort of a scum point. My most recent question is an attempt to see if he only responds to questions that require little effort to answer.
It isn't.
I really despise that Wisdom is asking someone else to do something he won't even do himself. I may vote Wisdom for that to pressure him to do more.
Why would there be a problem. I don't see any reason to call [Malakittens and Zionite] a "non-pair", and I am curious as to what your reasons to do so are. Why not just answer the question?
Because I thought I gave a decent answer when I first explained my thoughts on 110. But basically, if Zionite is scum, Malakittens probably isn't scum because she probably would've tried to derail the wagon on me (she literally said she would've voted me but liked her vote on Zionite better). If Zionite is town, Mala
could
be scum sticking to Zionite's wagon, giving reasons to stick to it that looked similar to what other players said. I only say
could
because that's how it felt gut-wise. The previous non-pairing of Malatown/Zionscum has actual logic to it.
