Mala that was not exactly my point I was trying to get Wis to look at the bigger picture, but I give up on that clearly he is always gonna read me as scumz even though I am not.
In post 324, Zionite wrote:It only makes sense if he's scum or bad at mafia, so I think he's scum.
And you ruled out the other option because...?
If I had this dilemma I'd meta him to see if he's actually bad at mafia so I could support this argument.
cmon everything you say practically has the Rach as must be scumz in it, not once have you tried looking at the players with me as Town. So yeah you are tunneling. Or defending Fuzzy against Zionite that is about the only non Rach thing I have seen, though I have not yet ISOed you. I need to do that.
meanwhile while we are doing this it gives the scumz a way to hide in the woodwork because there is not spotlight on them.
In post 324, Zionite wrote:It only makes sense if he's scum or bad at mafia, so I think he's scum.
And you ruled out the other option because...?
If I had this dilemma I'd meta him to see if he's actually bad at mafia so I could support this argument.
Again, not my job. The posting in this game supports a scum mindset, especially the ignoring of a case. If it's a bad case it should be easy for him to show why. Silence is admitting it's true. I find that when a player ignores a case against them it's indicative of being guilty. I just can't fathom why a town player would totally ignore a case on them unless they're bad.
And it's not just ignoring the case, it's ignoring everything I say. It's bullshit that he calls me scum and does no follow through whatsoever and I'm calling him out.
one of these days I am going to take a screenshot photo and post it so peeps can see what my screen looks like I have to scroll up and down to read peeps posts because I have the screen zoomed way in to make the font large enough for me to see.
In post 341, Wisdom wrote:So answer me. You're saying fuzzy is either scum or bad. Why did you rule out the latter since you didn't do any research?
I rule it out until there's reason to believe otherwise. I've said twice now that it's not my job to do meta research, especially when it's not the game i'm in currently. My current game takes precedence over meta every time. Are you saying fuzzy is a bad player?
Why is this the point you're fighting? I have a whole post dedicated to showing the contradictions fuzzy has presented in his play. It seems like you're cherry picking points you can argue against.
In post 335, RachMarie wrote:umm Fuzzy mine is way out of date too, but got anything else to say? like something relevant to the game at hand?
What do you think of Zio's case on you?
What do you think of how Wis has been defending you?
That is relevant, what with all the meta talk going on.
Zio's case on me is shit. I have no reason to sit here and argue against it, because it's a scum-drawn wagon. Nothing I say is going to make scum change their minds that they want to lynch me. Look elsewhere if you're not scum.