huh? Man, if I
had
just stated a rule, then okay. I have before; I've probably quoted LAL more than anyone else (I appear to be the only person who still truly believes it) and I'm probably a relative newbie here. I don't always have time to write an essay like the opne this post's gonna be, and if I wait 8 hours until I
am
free, I might have another page to deal with (I cannot believe I signed up for another normal; I'm a sucker for punishment).
However, I wasn't stating a rule, but my opinion; that a vote for no lynch is a vote for scum power. Pardon me for being concise about the crux of the issue: no lynching is of greater benefit to the scum than town, since scum have more strength at night and the town has the lynch to balance it out.
This whinging that it was so obvious that scum'd never try it, though? Honestly, it looks WIFOM to me.
You suggested a plan of action which held only potential harm for the town if it was taken up, then backtrack that it never
would
be, and you did it for the reactions. Well, we all reacted negatively toward your scum-friendly plan. Shock horror.