Lord Patator Charlixion the 6th: game over
-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
-
-
Empking Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Empking's Alt's Alt
- Posts: 16758
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
Hoopla could you explain the above in reference to your answer to me earlier in the game as seen in this quote:In post 1235, Hoopla wrote:When I got my role, I decided the best way to utilise it was to try and live beyond Night 1, and then shoot from the second night onwards (unless I was very sure of someone being scum N1) so I have decent odds of hitting scum. For the first day I was deliberately playing in a more fluid, in the moment style, as opposed to my usual MO of bombarding of the thread with weighty analysis. This was meant purely to avoid the nightkill N1, so I could influence the game with my role. Admittedly, it was slightly egotistical of me to assume I was a good chance of being NK'ed and I probably overcompensated and erred too far on the lurky side of things. Another motivation was just general curiosity to try a new playstyle.
---In post 700, Hoopla wrote:When I think about how I play, my activity seems more influenced by game size, interest and availability rather than alignment.
Why wouldn't you be more active? This game has a double day so you'd have MORE chance to influence the game, you are a vig (going into night even if you misvigged the game would still most likely be odd?), and why not just say "I'm trying a new playstyle" when I called you out on it?
Things just aren't meshing.
Also, why do you have Emp as a scum lean?-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Hoopla
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: October 12, 2008
i'm pretty sure i did at one pointIn post 1278, Oversoul wrote:"I'm trying a new playstyle" when I called you out on it?
process of eliminationIn post 1278, Oversoul wrote:Also, why do you have Emp as a scum lean?-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
Erm?In post 1280, Hoopla wrote:i'm pretty sure i did at one point
Did I miss it?
Could you find it for me?-
-
Hoopla
-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
@Hoopla - you're still scum telling.-
-
mykonian Frisian Shoulder-Demon
- Frisian Shoulder-Demon
- Frisian Shoulder-Demon
- Posts: 11963
- Joined: August 27, 2008
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Why?In post 1285, Oversoul wrote:Bah... I think Hoopla is town-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
No, she can attempt to confirm her power tonight, and if it doesn't go off, 'whoops, one shot! Musta been jailed, roleblocked, targeted someone Doc protected, ect. ect. ad nauseum.'
The claim isn't even that elaborate - she either chose to really underplay because she's a PR, or chose to fake a PR as a defense to her underplaying.
I won't even get into the question of why you would bother to do that in a double lynch day when her PR sort of hinges on her getting some decent reads - but let's just go back to the core question.
You're saying scum Hoopla wouldn't fake being a PR via underplay/use that as an excuse for underplay?
Because that's the only thing I see you saying that qualifies as calling her town.-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
PereV, does the EmpKing->Hoopla neighborization affect your interpretation of whatever result you received?
Clarify with the Mod as necessary.-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
Ya... I had that same thought. It didn't really make sense to me either.In post 1288, Thor665 wrote:I won't even get into the question of why you would bother to do that in a double lynch day when her PR sort of hinges on her getting some decent reads - but let's just go back to the core question.
You're saying scum Hoopla wouldn't fake being a PR via underplay/use that as an excuse for underplay?
I don't think Hoopla is the type of person to try a different style of play and then fake being a PR like that. I thought she just pulled the "different play style thing out of her ass" but she didn't. I'm just really iffy on everything right now. I should have just hammered her last night and saved everyone the hassle.
Either way, I am waiting for Matt to get back before I do anything-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
I'm fascinated you notice that nd not the other side of the coin.In post 1289, Iecerint wrote:PereV, does the EmpKing->Hoopla neighborization affect your interpretation of whatever result you received?
Clarify with the Mod as necessary.
That all said - Pere asked you a question earlier that I'm interested in, about you gaining a power and where your votes were yesterday.
Wanna weigh in on anything in that paradigm?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Why? Because she rectally extracted it at an earlier time than you thought she did?In post 1290, Oversoul wrote:I thought she just pulled the "different play style thing out of her Smurf" but she didn't.
Why does the earlier claim of it make it more legit to you?-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
MattP Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Dr. Feelgood
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: August 22, 2011
- Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre
-
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
...huh?In post 1270, Hoopla wrote:
i just got a PM from myko clarifying that same thing (presumably since quilford messaged him?). he said recruit could be used in those terms, in the same way investigation could be used to describe a tracker. before he implied to me that it wasn't the case.In post 1267, Quilford wrote:Hi! I totally PMed myko and was told that the word "recruited" might be used to describe what a voyeur would see Person A doing to Person B if Person A neighbourised Person B, but it was not explicitly confirmed nor denied that the word was or would be used.
You guys can draw the conclusions from that coz I am too tired.
This is really confusing. Did he change his mind?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
No, he didn't "change his mind".
Hoopla just changed the phrasing of what it was he was theoretically asked.
If you believe he was asked.-
-
kanyeknowsbest mafi ascum
- mafi ascum
- mafi ascum
- Posts: 7693
- Joined: November 26, 2008
- Location: dtla
-
-
kanyeknowsbest mafi ascum
- mafi ascum
- mafi ascum
- Posts: 7693
- Joined: November 26, 2008
- Location: dtla
-
-
kanyeknowsbest mafi ascum
- mafi ascum
- mafi ascum
- Posts: 7693
- Joined: November 26, 2008
- Location: dtla
btw the thing i was driving at last night for anyone who cares at this point is that this isnt a post you make when "maybe the neighborization would come up as a recruit?" and its also not the kind of post you make before you check to make sure 100% theres no way a voyeur could get that result on you.In post 1126, Hoopla wrote:Well, you're 100% lying, so that's a win for the town.
I have to go to work shortly, so give me until tonight to write up my final reads and my role claim. Then the town can do whatever.add me on snapchat and vine and twitter and instagram : ]
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.