"
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
In post 774, homertve wrote:We can restart this game again, calling it "Newbie 1368 - There will never be a title nor an ending"
In post 779, Syryana wrote:Ehrmagerd, it's Enormis! Let meh feel yo presence!
CoreH86, quote the following, and fill in your read next to each person's name (minimum of "I think X is town/scum", preferably decent reasons too):
RachMarie:scum, most curious behavior lurker
Syryana:leans scum with early on tunneling only until recently he's been my fos
Grimgroove:consistently towny
imkingdavid/Enormis:lurker but had protown content
Crandaja/Mothrax:lurker leans more scum than david
homertve:null current town feel
1. Please read my 735 (The question David never answered was in my 713).In post 784, enomis wrote:Homer, you seem to have syr as scum. Yet you are preferring Rach over him why?
What if i tell you She is the same in the other two games? Talking about IC stuff and shit and ignoring arguments. I shall stop here.In post 788, Grimgroove wrote:Hey Eno, I realize you can't read everything from the game, but since the start of D2 not that much has been said so maybe it would be a good start to just read everything from page 26, which makes it only 7 pages with few walls.
RachMarie's lurking is one of the main problems yes, and even though it's not a tell and she's lurking in other games too, I also met her in another game where she was town, and was more valiantly trying to avoid being lynched. Here she's at L-1, but check up on her latest posts. It's as if she's not even aware of that situation. She just talks about some general IC-stuff.
The only game content she has provided so far is a case on Syryana, which was very poor in all aspects. Whether or not this is bussing or grasping at a straw for getting a wagon going on on someone who's been under scutiny for a long time is still a dilemma, but what is clear for me is that her case on Syryana is NOT the result of scumhunting.
She's beenv ery lazy throughout this game,y et she claims to have an erntire meta-study on Syryana. This doesn't compute at all. The case is artificial and rubbish.
Its not Rach being Rach. It's that she is BLATANTLY SICK. She acts the same way in 3 ONGOING games with me. Unless you tell me there is a high likelyhood that she is scum in all three. You seem to be finding lurker instead of scum?In post 789, homertve wrote:1. Please read my 735 (The question David never answered was in my 713).In post 784, enomis wrote:Homer, you seem to have syr as scum. Yet you are preferring Rach over him why?
2. This game has been inactive for a long long time. I do have syr on my scum list (or at least I did). The reason I changed my vote can be found in my 664.
3. mothrax is a non-active player and she has no excuse for not sayinganythingduring day 2.
4. About Rach, she's on L-1 for a very long time and never sayanythingabout it. That is not something you can dismiss by "oh, it's just Rach being Rach".
Micro 181 is how long ago? We are talking about ongoing games(where she have her inpending crisis). If this is the case, don't you think you should leave her to day 2, since she have sorted out her crisis, to have a better read of her instead of lynching her,(which is a random lynch to me) now. And She said her computer died in the very first post? So i assume she has this crisis over the entire day 1. If you want to say she is scum for lurking, give me at least some meta where she lurks when scum. That will be mroe convincing?In post 793, Grimgroove wrote:You cannot dismiss all these arguments by her being sick. I was with her in the Micro-game 181, and yes, there too she wasn't the most active of the bunch. There too she didn't have many cases or arguments. But she did participate much more, she did defend herself, and she did give out reads that made sense within the confines of the game.
Calling that case she had on Syryana the result of a first glance is silly. Even though she hasn't been highly active, she's been with us since the start of the game, which was a month ago.
If this Real Life impediment is going to continue being an argument, I think RachMarie should ask for a replacement in case it really is. Using this as an argument isn't fair: we can't check it, and if it's the truth it hurts the game. Apologies if this sounds harsh, but this isn't the place for such kind of arguments. I'm playing within the confines of this topic, and maybe this forum, I don't want to have to take other matters into account.
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=28648, it ended two days ago, so pretty recent. ISO her there and see the difference.In post 794, enomis wrote:Micro 181 is how long ago? We are talking about ongoing games(where she have her inpending crisis). If this is the case, don't you think you should leave her to day 2, since she have sorted out her crisis, to have a better read of her instead of lynching her,(which is a random lynch to me) now. And She said her computer died in the very first post? So i assume she has this crisis over the entire day 1. If you want to say she is scum for lurking, give me at least some meta where she lurks when scum. That will be mroe convincing?In post 793, Grimgroove wrote:You cannot dismiss all these arguments by her being sick. I was with her in the Micro-game 181, and yes, there too she wasn't the most active of the bunch. There too she didn't have many cases or arguments. But she did participate much more, she did defend herself, and she did give out reads that made sense within the confines of the game.
Calling that case she had on Syryana the result of a first glance is silly. Even though she hasn't been highly active, she's been with us since the start of the game, which was a month ago.
If this Real Life impediment is going to continue being an argument, I think RachMarie should ask for a replacement in case it really is. Using this as an argument isn't fair: we can't check it, and if it's the truth it hurts the game. Apologies if this sounds harsh, but this isn't the place for such kind of arguments. I'm playing within the confines of this topic, and maybe this forum, I don't want to have to take other matters into account.
This.In post 797, Grimgroove wrote:Stop saying that "lurking" is the only thing we've got on her. Read