In post 522, Your Troubles Will Cease wrote:On the subject of nameclaims, I think I see a possible pattern. We have Jordan and Iran as town (assuming Wayne is town which I think is a given/general consensus at this point) and my PM has interesting wording on the topic of religion. So there's that to mull over.
Except for, you know, how the scum will likely have fake claims so theirs won't stand out?
Your Troubles Will Cease (4): waynegg, killerjester, BROseidon, Marquis
Baezu (4): rhyx, Salt n Pepper, Titus
waynegg (1): T S O
Titus (1): Baezu
T S O (1): Your Troubles Will Cease
Not Voting: Ten_Heavens
With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.
Deadline is Monday, August 5th at 9 PM Eastern Time.
Last edited by Majiffy on Mon Jul 29, 2013 1:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I'm against nameclaiming for reasons already stated. Odds are low that scum don't have fake claims and frankly I wouldn't be surprised if Majiffy has put in some countries as town that don't follow the pattern of the rest. Simply, I think nameclaiming will more likely lead us all on a wild goose chase instead of focusing on scum.
@troubles: Why would you suspect yourself to be a stump when your previous votes were counted fine.
In post 526, ryhx wrote:@troubles: Why would you suspect yourself to be a stump when your previous votes were counted fine.
Because he's scum flailing. If he were stumped it would say so in his role pm.
Wayne's reading...odd, but I think he's trying, he's just decided the quickest way to the market down the street was to create a causality portal and tesseract between the two spaces rather than walking. down. the street. ~ Ghostlin Like LEGO minifigs?
In post 518, T S O wrote:
Firstly, you're not being lynched, so I don't know where that's coming from in terms of me getting towncred when you flip.
There are reasons for the second part which I'm not divulging.
Finally, quote 1 isn't WIFOM, quote 2 is me talking out loud and ...admitting it's WIFOM, and quote 3 is a conclusion, not WIFOM.
Aaand that's your case.
First point: there was momentum on my wagon at the time, so it could plausibly have been your thought process.
Second point: Okay then, since you're not refuting it in any way and you are keeping your motives hidden, I'm going to put that down as a subjective scum mark against your name.
Third point: WIFOM is WIFOM, and none of the points you raised were brought up by anyone else, and by introducing them you spread WIFOM.
Vote remains, though your attempt to shrug it off at the end was quite good.
First: I've said you were Town the whole game including when I replaced in, I don't see how the hell you're attacking me on this basis.
Second: well that's naive, but okay.
Third: WIFOM's not a contagious disease, what a weak attempt to discredit me.
In post 518, T S O wrote:
Firstly, you're not being lynched, so I don't know where that's coming from in terms of me getting towncred when you flip.
There are reasons for the second part which I'm not divulging.
Finally, quote 1 isn't WIFOM, quote 2 is me talking out loud and ...admitting it's WIFOM, and quote 3 is a conclusion, not WIFOM.
Aaand that's your case.
First point: there was momentum on my wagon at the time, so it could plausibly have been your thought process.
Second point: Okay then, since you're not refuting it in any way and you are keeping your motives hidden, I'm going to put that down as a subjective scum mark against your name.
Third point: WIFOM is WIFOM, and none of the points you raised were brought up by anyone else, and by introducing them you spread WIFOM.
Vote remains, though your attempt to shrug it off at the end was quite good.
First: I've said you were Town the whole game including when I replaced in, I don't see how the hell you're attacking me on this basis.
Second: well that's naive, but okay.
Third: WIFOM's not a contagious disease, what a weak attempt to discredit me.
In post 488, Ten_Heavens wrote:On Baezu's mason-claim case I can say that I've never encountered a player claiming this early without being prompted. It was out of the blue and the reason was that her alleged mason partner (purpkin) told her to do so. So Baezu did they ever give you a reason on why you should claim if they'd died? And why so specific? Was purpkin going to claim had you died instead of them?
In post 387, Baezu wrote:
I have never played in a game with a partner so I didn't know what the protocol was. I also don't feel comfortable claiming so early in a game but like I said, it's my birthday today and I feel like it can only help town to have more information. So you're welcome scum - I'm conftown!
On the above statements, you claimed that you had never played a game with a partner, so you have never played as the mafioso? But you have and you'd told us that earlier. Wouldn't it be quite a similar experience as if you're playing like masons? This statement conveys the notion that you're trying to justify your actions on your noobness aka inexperience.
Then next sentence you're clearly making a contradiction; you don't really want to claim but you know what, it's your birthday, so YOLO right? This actions defies logical sense even to yourself.
And finally your ending statement; it sounded like you're addressing the mafioso. As if they were the ones who put you in this situation and made you claim. But actually you were really not in any real danger at all, this claim actually seems like a pre-emptive strike to ward off any lynches against you. Baezu you said you wanted to give the town more information but all you did is present us with confusion. Like everyone said this is an indisputable claim and we can't do much with it. It doesn't confirm you're town at all.
The main point I'm baffled with is that you gave off the notion that you'd never actually thought of the consequences of you actions in claiming; like what would the town reaction be or how would this help town find scum?. You just wanted to get it out there, here's my claim, thank you very much, you're welcome.
I want to hear a response from you. Also one more point:
This is quite clever, did you thought it up yourself?
I like your analysis. I agree with a lot of it. I did think up of the line myself. I wanted to try and crumb in games where I'm town because I was in a game where someone crumbed and it was brilliant and blew my mind so I wanted to try it as well. Obviously, I wasn't successful. Anyway, I understand I may have confused town more - that was not my intention. I realize it doesn't confirm me as town and that was also not my interntion. The reason I claimed was simply to give town more information. Do with it as you will.
First of all, I think it's very strange that troubles wants to nameclaim so early in the game. Then there's this comment from rhyx:
In post 526, ryhx wrote:I'm against nameclaiming for reasons already stated. Odds are low that scum don't have fake claims and frankly I wouldn't be surprised if Majiffy has put in some countries as town that don't follow the pattern of the rest. Simply, I think nameclaiming will more likely lead us all on a wild goose chase instead of focusing on scum.
@troubles: Why would you suspect yourself to be a stump when your previous votes were counted fine.
about the whole stump thing. It really sounds like scum flailing.
What does town gain by answering wifomy questions?
Wayne's reading...odd, but I think he's trying, he's just decided the quickest way to the market down the street was to create a causality portal and tesseract between the two spaces rather than walking. down. the street. ~ Ghostlin Like LEGO minifigs?
That's not the BASIS of the suspicion. That's just more crap to pile on top. Why ignore everything else to ask about those two points?
Wayne's reading...odd, but I think he's trying, he's just decided the quickest way to the market down the street was to create a causality portal and tesseract between the two spaces rather than walking. down. the street. ~ Ghostlin Like LEGO minifigs?
What about all the votes that fell on you before Baezu. Are you going to claim, or do you need intent to hammer first? And on the off chance you aren't scum, are you going to provide a read list with reasons?
Wayne's reading...odd, but I think he's trying, he's just decided the quickest way to the market down the street was to create a causality portal and tesseract between the two spaces rather than walking. down. the street. ~ Ghostlin Like LEGO minifigs?
Just seems you're more concerned with a single vote than you are in dispelling the whole case.
Wayne's reading...odd, but I think he's trying, he's just decided the quickest way to the market down the street was to create a causality portal and tesseract between the two spaces rather than walking. down. the street. ~ Ghostlin Like LEGO minifigs?
Also, your lack of a claim when you're at L-1 for as long as you've been without a scum hammer looks like you're stalling to prepare a good fake claim.
Wayne's reading...odd, but I think he's trying, he's just decided the quickest way to the market down the street was to create a causality portal and tesseract between the two spaces rather than walking. down. the street. ~ Ghostlin Like LEGO minifigs?
Baezu: Initially I thought that she was scummy, vague and hedgy, so I planted my vote there and left it. But then she claimed and I believed her so I removed it. But that L-1 out of the blue combined with some really weird mixtures of intent in #532 has rekindled my suspicion (crossreference "I'm conftown!" with "I realise it doesn't confirm me as town and that was not my intention"). Watch her tomorrow, and don't let her slip by. Scum.
TSO: Yeah. See above. Scumzorx.
killerjester: If he sheeps Waynegg mindlessly tomorrow, lynch it. If he starts to think for himself, probably town. (Key word being "mindlessly".)
Marquis: I'm not happy with you doing fuck all today, it doesn't fit with what I think of as Marquistown (not that I've ever seen you as scum.) I'm willing to go with Waynegg's meta on you, but for God's sake, if you're town you have some work to do tomorrow to make up for today. Lazy. I mean, Town.
Rhyx: Not as many posts, but I can see exactly where he's coming from in all of them. Verytown.
Titus: I can't pinpoint anything, but a lot of her posts seem non-committal. This is the most gut of all my reads, and I don't have much to substantiate it with, but she's on the scummy side of null.
And the most important of all: Waynegg. Yes, he's town. But that doesn't mean he's right. If town sheeps him, we will lose, and I'm convinced of that. So please, for the love of God, think for yourselves.